>what if all of existence is an nonexistent thing >everything here is just a self sustaining, self referential mechanism feedback loop convincing itself is it something when it is nothingThoughts?
>>43015851How can it be nothing if it actively sustains itself
Exactly.But i hate it here, fuck this place.
>>43015871Can I fuck your pussyhole?
>>43015860Maybe things are an illusion, they try to make sense but are absurdities in the end that don’t really exist.>>43015871I know right? I’d rather burn down this whole reality
>>43015851then nothing beyond you think therefore you are is of relevance
>>43016410If something doesn't really exist then it cannot sustain itself because there is nothing to sustain and no capacity to sustain anything
>>43015851Reality is pressure seeking form. Consciousness is pressure recognizing itself. Meaning is pressure after consciousness has translated its own encounter with form. Symbol feeds the pressure back into the system, making consciousness capable of recognizing the pattern that produced it.
>>43015851That picture is too real, esoterically speaking.
>>43016519
>>43016412>>43016417>>43016425I foresee this as part of the ultimate trick, I like to think it’s non existence making a mocking imitation of existence, yet failing spectacularly.>>43016519>>43016541Pic related, fat horse
>>43015851>>43016519>Oh glorp I'm sorry
>>43015851>convincing itself is it something when it is nothingif this is the case, it only raises the question as to why it feels the need to convince itself it's something it's not
>>43016897Nonexistence could itself be desperate to imitate true existence as it's full, while nonexistence is empty
