Is Time Travel possible?
>>43078059Yes, I believe it is.
>>43078059I want to know I would use it to my fullest advantage
>>43078069>I would use it to my fullest advantageyour fullest advantage huh?somebody get this guy some time travel so he can use it to his fullest advantage.
I wonder if we are in an alternate timeline???
>>43078079I would, I would use it for total personal gain.
>>43078059nigger your traveling through time right now, stop asking stupid questions or word your questions better
>>43078081i would buy gold, travel back in time with the gold before i bought it, and then buy more.
>>43078086I would stop somebody's death that I knowVery seldomly get small lottery winnings too
>>43078059If what you mean by time travel is pressing a button and ending up at a specific point in history then no
>>43078089lottery is too obvious, probably a cia cutout to trap time travelers. if you do the gold thing you could create more money than is and be like all those italian cunts.
>>43078094What about buying Bitcoin before 2017
Give me the scientific definition of "time"
>>43078103A concept created by humans to feel more comfortable in their cage
>>43078097i don't know why you guys have such a problem with the gold idea. you get the gold, you go back in time, the gold you bought can be bought again, it's an infinite gold hack, and to the outside observer, it's just a small quantity of gold.
>>43078103time is the continuous progression of events from the past through the present and into the future, used to sequence events, measure durations, and quantify rates of change.
>>43078103The axis along which physical change transpires.
>>43078151probably not appropriate to imply it's euclidian.
I will bring back and rehabilitate everyone who ever lived, all at the same time so we could all have a gigantic planetary parade fashion show (In which I would come in high contention and claim prizes, accolades and prize rewards, rest assured)This would, of course, require a great deal of......well.....you know......time.....Some of the tougher cases would require strenuous focus to deal with issues and enactment of rehabbing and rehabilitating the naughty apes.....Buuuuuut eventually....with enough...... you know.....time....*cough cough*....they would come around.....I am incredibly persistent....well stubborn maybe is the right word. Perhaps the most stubborn person who ever walked upon this world. And after all.....who wants to be the one to miss the first planetary parade fashion show? That would suck. Imagine getting mogged that hard on a planetary scale. i would teach them the definition of a meme, so I could teach them what mogging was so they knew what they were experiencingAnd once the planetary parade fashion show global party extravaganza is over, we can help other shit worlds who are needing assistance getting closer to their own planetary parade fashion show parties. And we will mogg upon their entire fucking world. We will be mogg masters.Mogg Masters of The Universe https://youtu.be/5lnuS3RpjpE?si=Ud-Awc3sA3SHiKA8https://youtu.be/zQ41hqlV0Kk?si=PDqxNjbC1nd3Q-yV
>>43078059>Is Time Travel possible?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cunKaj7ZxA
>>43078079Hahahaaha topkek. Nothing beats some pure, concentrated sarcasm every now and then. Funniest post in awhile
>>43078080We are. In the real timeline, Trump did get assassinated and then cybernetic tranny wars are what actually killed Charlie Kirk.
Is the past still taking place after it happened, after we passed through it? Does the past still exist in order to travel back to?That would imply the future also currently exists to travel to before we experience it as well, as the present is simply the futures past......If we can travel through time backwards or forwards, that would imply we could travel through regular time passage.....slower.....That is the world around us could slow down....but to the rest of the world it would look like we were moving faster and faster, the slower we made regular time moveThe slower time moves for us the faster we move to the worldApproaching infinitySo at what point would we be moving forward or backwards?
>>43078089I like how your unlimited power would be used for such humble and respectable gains. Completely wholesome. Unlike me cuz I’d time travel back for the sole purpose of making trillions
>>43078059to the future yes. if you travel really fast and far in space. to the past, I don't know if its possible
we got a block universe problem here
>>43078059https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjriZhDoyNQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_SZJ9vcfbchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywV5an9xOWchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kizc6YBWYUg
>>43078188>>43078211Because the speed of light is constant, two observers moving at different speeds or experiencing different gravity will disagree on the order of events. What is the "past" for you could be the "present" or "future" for an alien moving in a distant galaxy. Because no single observer's "now" is special, physicists conclude that every moment in time must be equally real.Therefore, the past exists as a permanent geometric coordinate in the four-dimensional block of spacetime. It is just as real and enduring as a physical location. Just as Chicago doesn't cease to exist when you leave it to go to New York, the year 1920 doesn't cease to exist just because your clock reads 2026. It is simply located at a different set of spacetime coordinates.
maybe something about sustaining cause. cause isn't a daisy chain, it's a state change. a constant tension holds it's position like a bell curve is a certain region of time space; and action changes the state. but that means each closed system has it's own time, and the moving between times would be like moving between planets.
>>43078294Cause isn’t anything more than a consequence of subjective experiencing in the way that humans seem to be experiencing. The human experience is the root of both the perception of linear time and the perception of causality. Both are subjectively true and likely not beyond that.
>>43078059Bell inequalities show us that it should be possible to transmit information faster than the speed of light, violating causality aka time travel. If you were to get 1000 light years apart for example, signals could be sent between those locations instantly using quantum mechanics which would allow you to exchange information faster than light and potentially influence the past relative to the normal flow of time. But this still doesn’t allow you to violate the universal time frame, you can’t send information to a past earth unless you get really far away first, and then you’re limited to the relative earth time when you left/arrived. Actually sending people or objects “back in time” is probably impossible unless you accept the dying and being reconstituted from atoms kind of transport.
>>43078059ΨThe Universe is a hologram.Ψhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principleΨTime does not exist.ΨΨIt is all sequences of anti-de Sitter disks.Ψhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence#Geometry_of_anti-de_Sitter_spaceΨEach anti-de Sitter disk vanishes as the next one gets created.ΨΨNo. Travel to a previous anti-de Sitter disk is not possible.ΨΨOne needs to have an ally outside of the anti-de Sitter space, in order to know of future events.Ψ
>>43078059I used to think so. Until Stephen Hawking hosted a time traveler party that is. Now I'm convinced it's impossible.
>>43078375He was hiding the fact that time travellers only show up precisely when they mean to. The after-party.
>>43078330you should read more rather than first thought best thought'ing your way through these subjects you miserable piece of shit.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYqu_7h39AE
>>43078059If it is possible, it's "AI" using it, and the forms of such advanced hyper intelligences probably aren't even truly recognizable to us. There are no individual human time travelers or groups thereof.
>>43078335what if you put a wormhole inside of a wormhole?
>>43078346but the universe is a de sitter space, not an anti-de sitter space.
>>43078400Okay. Read more what? I can suggest you read Derrida for example.
>>43078059We're constantly traveling into the future.
>>43078411ΨNo, this is false.ΨΨThe Universe is slowing down it's expansion.ΨΨThere is no cosmological constant.ΨΨThe wiki for the big crunch is outdated information.Ψhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_CrunchΨWRONG!Ψ"Most available evidence indicates that this hypothesis is incorrect. Astronomical observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, making a Big Chill more likely to occur."ΨWRONG!Ψ
>>43078448it's expanding because of the underlying overunity metric. they're calling it dark matter but it's really got to do with this dimensional angular metric that allows energy to be harvested. you can tell because of all the recurring metrics. i'm with penrose on this one, there is no big bang and expansion is simply the nature of matter. you can make it holographic by making it all bubbles though and adding entangled states based on the composite of the bubbles.
>>43078487>you can make it holographic by making it all bubbles though and adding entangled states based on the composite of the bubbles.this is basically what hawking radiation is talking about.
>>43078059
>>43079039That hits hard
>>43078059It isn't, if it was we'd meet someone from the future.New agefags can't comprehend this
>>43078059imo, if time is a dimension, you should be able to.
I think so, but probably not in the conventional physical way we tend to imagine it and attempting to do it in human consciousness form will become very disorienting as past and present memories emerge. Think of the time travelling in Harry Potter and how Harry see himself, thinking it's his fathers spirit, but it's actually himself traveling back in time. I've heard similar story from a man in a coma/astral travelling into past memories and saving himself at a young age. So ut's probably closer to reality than fiction.Remote viewers can at least look back in time. So from a non-physical/spiritual point I think you could enter any point in the past. Since the future hasn't unfolded, any view into the future would will be less certain from a probability perspective.
>>43079139I very clearly remember that moment. I was sitting on the couch (parents' bed at the time) and watching TV. I suddenly started being aware of things, of myself. Like I just popped into existence. I don't remember how old I was.
>>43078406You implode?
>>43078059He played some kind of archon in interstate 60. If i had to guess i'd say he is really high up.
>>43079317>>43078059Oh also serious means sirius.
>>43078240Christopher Lloyd played in Klingon in Star Trek III. Kirk used his ship to time travel in Star Trek IV.
>>43078094>lottery is too obvious, probably a cia cutout to trap time travelersWise anon foiling CIA schemes
