>>43089804
OP here. I just ass pounded my boyfriend and I still have his poop on my willy . AMA
>inb4 does it stink
Yeah it stinks real good

>>43089804
1: They don't actually match perfectly. Just close enough for humans to notice.
2: Our distance to both the sun and moon change throughout the year and month. There's a good amount of variation.
3: The moon is getting farther away so we just happened to exist at roughly the time when it roughly matches the sun.

>>43089804
intelligent design.

intelligence does not just build pyramids, it also builds solar systems

>>43090483
>>43090491
Why would an intelligent designer create a solar system with non-circular orbits, different orbital planes that don't match with each other, and generally just make everything close enough instead of mathematically perfect?

File: The Pale Fox.png (725 KB, 966x1500)

725 KB PNG

>>43090586
this is not a perfect universe.

oops.

>>43090586
NTA but circular orbits in a solar system like our's are impossible since all of the planets have an effect on each other. So if the intelligent designer is designing a solar system with multiple planets, that means elliptical orbits.

>>43089973
>1: They don't actually match perfectly. Just close enough for humans to notice.

This like saying we shouldn't call the Pyramids pyramids since perfect mathematical pyramids are smooth, whereas time has given the Pyramids weathering and divots.
On average the sun and the moon appear the same size to within 3%.

Since according to NASA at https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html and https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html,
the sun has a diameter of 1,391,400 km, the moon a diameter of 3,474.8 km, the sun is 149,600,000 km away, and the moon is 384,400 km away.

So they're going to match to within 3% on average.

Note this means that even with those rough estimates, the moon and sun have a balanced size ratio of close to a truly exactly 1:400, 1,391,400 km/3,474.8 km=400.4.

Their sizes, of course, can stay very stable for billions of years. Their distances however cannot since by physical necessity the orbits involved are elliptical, and things like impacts and natural recession in its orbit (much better than the other way around and the moon getting closer, for obvious reasons) nudge the moon, so its distance changes more than its size.

But we see the distance still being on average within 3% of perfection, even with all the movement, and the recession over the course of human history, and the approximate numbers, and impacts likely moving it to some extent: 149600000/384400=389.18. Less than 3% divergent from the perfect 400 even despite all the chaos necessarily involved with the system.

>3: The moon is getting farther away so we just happened to exist at roughly the time when it roughly matches the sun.

This would only make it stranger that it becomes aesthetic and balanced, unlike any other known planet-moon system, when an audience comes onto the scene who will be able to recognize and admire the beauty of aesthetics in the sky, the first ones with a concept of art to appreciate this daily art piece.

>>43093018
>This like saying we shouldn't call the Pyramids pyramids since perfect mathematical pyramids are smooth, whereas time has given the Pyramids weathering and divots.
Except the people using this argument are going "Look, the Pyramids are perfectly smooth, that's why we know aliens built them!" and then get mad when you point out they are not.

>>43093054
My reply is "I can tell your message was written by a person since it's a perfect strawman" P:
Instead of responding to the actual points you crafted a fantasy scenario of something the person you're replying to could be saying that would make them look foolish and easily beaten. The quintessence of strawman that achieves the impossible Platonic perfection that even aliens couldn't give the Pyramids

>>43089804
they're both trying to pick a lane

>>43089804
One possibility is that people can notice it and have a choice to believe in God or not. Like the golden ratio, synchronicity etc. If you want i can go into more detail.

>>43089804
Oh you know why.