>>43095680you go to ooglyboogly land
https://youtube.com/watch?v=65jdcvSOOjI
https://youtube.com/watch?v=4Uz6anwm47g
>>43095749>slightly altered mirror argument>confused frames of referenceWhere does one even begin with such a malformed argument? Why do you claim that subjective nonexistence is objective nonexistence? Why do you assume that existence is mirrored when there is a nonmirrored element such as the loss of a self to one side (death) and no loss to the other (pre-conception)? Why do you claim that pre-conception is the same state as death when you even recognize that pre-conception was not infinite when death could be or might not be? Why are you treating consciousness like matter or energy instead of the emergent property it seems to be? The matter of the brain is preserved and transformed into biomass as we decompose, the energy likewise is conserved and transformed. Consciousness in a naturalistic model of the universe does not need to be because it is neither energy or matter in and of itself.