I was thinking about solipsism and how numbers exist and for numbers to exist there needs to be a core unit in the number one and that we apply unity to larger systems like rivers which are actually made of atoms, but atoms aren't even a true unit as they are made of subatomic particles and then I looked into the very most base structure within an atom to see what we can actually say is a unit and I learned the most fundamental "level" of physical matter is a pairing of up quarks and down quarks so there literally isn't any unity in or even a duality. Protons and neutrons aren't actually pairs; they are triplets of valence quarks (protons are two up, one down; neutrons are one up, two down).
solipsism is disproven by the 4th paralogism
>>43182461You cannot disprove solipsism as it exists as a unfalsifiable; essentially it doesn't matter if it's true or not to any meaningful degree. If you have a problem with it that's entirely a personal issue. For all I know you're a figment of my mind and there's nothing that could ever be done to prove otherwise and this is something immediately obvious to anyone with an IQ above 70.
>>43182217How is this helping you be a better person?
>>43182217I want to pee on people.
>>43185171Solipsism makes me want to do shyt like this.Fuck stupid fucking NPCs
>>43182217Higgs particle is 1 and the other numbers are solipsism?
>>43182461Did they use to burn time travelers?
>>43182217If solipsism exists, then the "you" or "I" that is everyone is an unimaginably vast light that incorporates all things and would be near impossible to identify with yourself in your current form as it lacks a fleshy body divorced from the ground and thus lacks your "experiences".Dividing yourself/ourselves from this source, creating a ground to walk on air to breathe, and an unimaginably vast empty space full of stars and planets and strange shapes and infinite lifeless landscapes can only lead to the conclusion that solipsism is incredibly naive and basic.You simply cannot take solipsism alone without a truckload of "buts", definitions and complex identifications and guesswork.BUT that also goes for most other philosophies. I don't think arriving at a categorical, assertive truth makes sense. Knowledge continues to grow and expand and we will die without knowing the full scope of the universe. If that's intentional, then dividing the "you" from the "all" is by design.
>>43185206kek. enjoy the trauma that comes afterward, everyonoe will think of you as a deranged lunatic creep and you'll be ostraschized by your figmented imaginings
