Damn… did China cook?
>>64689904>cookI fucking hate you zoomers so goddamn much.
Why do chinkshills love to post passive aggressively like a woman? This shit isn't tough at all.
>>64689924because chinese "men" and women are almost indistinguishable
>China target locked Japanese F-15s>China didn't target lock Japanese F-35sSo did Japan decide China's shitty 1970s aircraft carrier wasn't worth deploying real fighters for or can the chinks not see them?
>>64689904You cook foodstuffs, not aircraft.
>Make a commercial>It's all about horsesGlock please no please don't do this I put up with enough teasing from the other guys calling me "Cum Rustler" and "Stallion Milker" and a bunch of other djumb shit at the range I can't take this I'm going to cry. This isn't fucking funny my pride as a glock owner is on the line
>>64689621I have not met a “real” cowboy that lives south of 39 degrees north, so your statement holds true only in that you’re an homosexual, or worse, an woman.
>>64689070Welcome back, Mr. Hands
>>64689325I'm a deranged freak who won't stop fucking ya muddah.Fuck yamudda!
>>64689868lmao
>>64689621>I've never met a "real" cowboy...I have never met a real cowboy, as I was not born in the mid-to-late 18th century.
Post cool swords or swords you like, talawar of Mughal leader Aurugnzeb
>>64686809In it's current home in Dresden."Scythe sword, allegedly owned by Thomas Müntzer (c1489-1525)German, 17th century, calendar blades with runes c.1500"The 'allegedly' bit here being the polite museum way to acknowledge and old attribution while also dismissing it as highly distilled bullshit.
>>64686545
And the katzbalger.
>>64686545Update your 4chanX
My great grandfather was a decorated officer in the US Airforce during the Korean War. My great uncle has a display case with his medals, and his service rifle, which is a select fire M2 Carbine. I haven't inspected it closely, so idk if it's functional or demilitarized. If it is functional idk if it registered or transferable.Has anyone heard of a scenario like this before? I can't find any examples online of an officer being given an M2 when they retired. I'm also certain that it is an M2, not an M1 Carbine.My great uncle plans to give me his guns, including that one at some point in the near future. Obviously I hope it's transferable, but I think that could only be the case if it was registered when he retired. I doubt that he submitted any paperwork for it later in his life, and I know that my great uncle never did.Any thoughts or advice?
>>64687010>Any thoughtsSundown at Coffin Rock.https://rhp.detmich.com/Sundown_At_Coffin_Rock.html
>>64687010Shut the fuck up about it and graciously accept your gift
>>64687452>graciously accept your giftTHEN>>64687250>Hide it.Coffin Rock, I'm telling you...
>>64687010It COULD be a semi-auto built on an M2 Carbine marked receiver, as M1 and M2 Carbines have identical receivers, the full-auto and fire selector just attaching in there. The only true way to tell would be to test it or to take it apart and see.The annoying part here is that the ATF tends to regard a receiver marked with M2 as just being a machinegun, whether or not it actually has the full fun parts installed or not, but they are also not consistent in this either, they have allowed M2 marked receivers as semi-autos, and they have allowed overstamps, but only sometimes.I would seriously look high and low to try to find any tax stamp and paperwork for the thing if it's an actual M2 Carbine, it's possible that it is registered. Potentially, the full-auto conversion parts themselves are what's registered as the machinegun.If it's not, well, I don't like to suggest people break serious laws, but I also don't like seeing historical weapons and heirlooms be senselessly destroyed, so my gut instinct would be to take it apart and store the parts hidden somewhere, packed in some good preservative grease, for in case laws ever change or there's another amnesty.You WOULD be taking a very serious legal risk by doing something like that, so I can't exactly recommend it, but I would fully emotionally understand that approach.Plan C would be to torch cut the receiver and then have the gun rebuilt on another one, but it hurts to even say that.
report it stolen.
>If a known conman hadn't made up a fairy tale branch of Christianity we wouldn't have the most elegant and innovative small arms designs known to manI think about this a lot
>>64688793Trinitarian claws compelled by the deceptions of The Demiurge and the Roman lies of Nicaea typed this post.
>>64688793>you need to accept that Jews are God's Chosen PeopleNice try Schlomo
>>64689021I hate kikes, doesn't mean I'm gonna pretend half of the Bible just didn't happen. Maybe God changed his opinion on jews when he thought flooding and smiting was a little too much
>>64689021>>64689036Did you guys miss the parts of the OT where the jews comically fuck up every single one of their covenants with God and then in the NT God makes the people of the new covenant his chosen people instead?The only "christians" who believe modern jews are still le chosen people are brainwashed boomer evangelicals.
>>64688805Genetic testing disproves Exodus and the Israelite invasion and conquest of the Levant, too.
Did any of his points have merit? Seemed to me like being a contrarian for the sake of it
My magazine fed shotgun feeds 3" magnum buckshot more reliably than my pump action...I'd grab a full size 9mm pistol before a shotgun unless I was hunting or shooting clays though
>>64686122So what you're saying is everyone should go the SBS route with a shockwave. I completely agree.
>>64686180>can't afford a m4>DURR I DONNO IF THIS SHITTUBE IS BETTER THAN A PUMPpaul had some shit tier takes
>>64686785No anon, this board's surrogate dad was always right about everything all the time. If you think Paul was wrong about something it's because you're wrong
>>64686785>can't afford a m4There was once a time when a used Maverick 88 was cheaper than the most bottom-of-the-barrel AR-15.
>>64689768A tremendous fag posted a spam thread.
Its explicitly a CV90 with some plastic dress-up shit on the outside. The technology may eventually go somewhere, but that vehicle was only ever for show.
>>64689768There are tens of thousands of them, you just can't see them.
>>64689768I think the bigger question is why is no one mentioning the first M1E3 prototype being delivered a few weeks ago.
Still reeling from the sheer retardation of the Battleship proposal, plus that it'll be replacing the DDG(X) project.But the FF(X) looks good. It won't have VLS in it's first flight, but it'll have an established supply chain and available logistics for repair and maintenance. As long as they don't try to make more capable than it needs to be, i think it'll be a good boat.
>>64687281Do you have any source for that claim?
>>64687430You know nothing about ships, holy fuck you are retarded.
>>64687377>All that shitStill waiting on proofs
>>64687457>people have spent the last 20 years looking for reasons to hate the LCS and this is the main one they latched onto.I'm pretty sure main one is lack of actual mission modules that were pretty essential for a modular ship.
>>64689485The only missing one is ASW, which was canceled because they decided to use FFGX for ASW. Now that FFGX is canceled and FFX is useless, they might end up buying them after all.
Long time no see /k/. Think I could get some info on this revolver I picked up today? I ain't finding much online.
>>64688785>Pressure curve would be relevant if we were talking about a semiauto, but we aren't so it doesn't matter.wrong you have no idea what you are talking about
>>64688794h&r revolvers and bulldogs are both cheap revolvers
Shoot this model only with BP, it won't explode with smokless., but it will not like that diet after long.
>>64688558Oh hey I have one of thoseDon't shoot anything but black powder out of it, the frame is cast ironThey were originally chambered for ".32 h&r" but s&w long is more or less the same thing
>>64688558>h&r 32 revolverIs it in .32 h&r or s&w long? .32 h&r seems right on the line of what could feasably be in a break action revolver
>Ukraine lost 87% of its Abrams tanks in under two years. Australia's 49 replacement tanks arrive as the 68-ton breakthrough weapon has been forced into a different role>It is now used not as a spearpoint but a "shielded hammer" — only surviving in a symphony of sensors, jammers, and screens.Tanks are now truly obsolete:https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/12/19/australia-completes-delivery-of-49-abrams-tanks-now-they-must-survive-the-drones/
>>64684867>map with no key>not even in englishin the bin it goes.
>>64689839No one cares whether you can't read a map.
>>64659031China and the US can, the others are mostly irrelevant.
>>64657656Australia would literally never use them. They probably just bought them to clear some US overstock back in the day.
>>64684867Based. Hopefully you fags will cease shitting up the site, and maybe even starve yourselves to death like the palishits.
Here is how tanks can win.The chain doesn't need to be very thick, just strong enough to support a very high RPM, and also collision against drones.Even if the chain breaks, the spool can just release more chain.There should be some dynamic counter weight to keep things balanced.
>>64686484Classic.
>>64688613except drones don't fly as nearly as fast as a bullet.
Here is my wunderwaffe.
OP how about shut the fuck up about the spool, like yea, it might be the most brilliant technical idea I've ever heard, but it sucks and we're gonna shut this down and bury it so hard that the world will never know about your fucking spool
>>64684913Ah yes chap the good old whirling dirvish of death and destruction.Carry on.
Speech: http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/5ceed4f1eb2058145a9bbbc60fcf07dd.kcmsftl;rd: Basically they want a nuclear sub fleet and are building a Blue Water navy, new surface ships explicitly referred to as 'Attack Destroyers'1/4: It is large.
>>64676363Feels like a lot of nork propaganda pictures I see feature Kim pointing at something off camera. What is the desired effect?
>>64687844>>64687861They have already begun doing all that, some of it they have been doing for decades. I find it interesting that prior to the Ukraine war everyone would mock things like having 1000+ 14.5mm batteries or modernizing KS-19s, now both sides would desperately love to have that. >>64687519They have been trying to improve their long range AA missile for about 15 years, i have confidence that they will make it work if only through pure persistence. The software aspect is something they should be somewhat competent at, any delays would be due to them insisting it be proprietary and weird. They flew their Mig-29s for years without IFF, they insisted on making their own because they didn't trust the one they came with.>>64687888He's leading, they want dynamic shots of him and his entourage doing something. If they chose the moment he points at where they are walking to next everyone is in motion. It reinforces the fact that he is rushing around doing On the Spot Guidance, it's a major component of their nation mythos. He's inspecting something on a daily basis, sometimes multiple locations. It isn't entirely propaganda. It is a small nation so he really does eventually inspect everything. If nothing else it ensures he is acquainted with the basic processes behind how everything works, of any world leader Kim probably knows his nations capacities the best simply because he's looked at them all.Imagine if if the US president was watching 4-5 hours of 'How It's Made' with only US companies featured on a daily basis, that's how i imagine the effect would be.
>>64687721>If you arent american then who cares if we kill you. Go cry about it.Least psychopathic American.
>>64689178Golems can't be psychopathic
This is a propaganda operation, or else the Chinese will do 90% of the construction and will use North Korea as a proxy like a luxury Wagner
what 10/22 should i get? i like the wood carbine with iron sights but the slick one with receiver rail looks cool too. will i miss not having iron sights? is there any accuracy advantage to stainless barrel?
One day, maybe. Or at least whenever they sort the suppressor tax stamp stuff
>>64680810>>what 10/22 should i get?>One that you build yourself. A basic 10/22 is a solid gun but everyone ends up replacing parts - might as well cut out the middleman and build exactly what you want from scratch.Not OP but I just recommend finding the cheapest model you can and starting from there. A receiver, bolt, and trigger group will cost you what a regular 1103 would last I checked, even just take-offs (usually from builders who toss the OEM parts). Also what the FUCK did Ruger do to their catalog? There's only the 1103 left for the carbine tab.
bump
>>64681809I was so excited to try out minimag after everything I heard and read about it, but apparently my rifle hates it. Top is your common Blazer slop, bottom is minimag.
>>64687722git gud
Discuss cheap solutions to the drone problem.Not welcome:>dronefags>laser fags>missile fags>unknown technology fags
>>64681631This. Better systems to more quickly deploy these nets. Think of it as "aerial entrenching."
>>64686411You’ve been able to detect people in real time for ages with minimal hardware. The requirements for a hunter-killer fully autonomous drone are totally different. >>64686428Even with something like a raspberry pi 5 or nvidia jetson Nano it flickers. A person gets a branch in front of a third of their body it’s not going to recognize it as a person. If you put it 150 meters up into the air and have it look down at a position it’s not going to pick out a person in the clutter. It’s not AI like ChatGPT, it’s not going to ”remember” that a person is behind a tree or car. It’s not able to deduce things. I’ve seen drones with image recognition like 1.5 years ago. If it was as simple as that ”hurr durr just have it fly towards the area then towards what it spots” that’d be done. It might work in an open desert but that’s not what we’re talking about.>>64686646Yes, because it works. Things like AI image recognition allow you to do it a lot cheaper and more accessible. If you know how a plane is going to look parked at an airfield you can train the model on it, have the drone fly towards that area using INS and terrain recognition for the path it’s trained on then hit whatever planes it sees parked there. Or for things like power-stations. That’s an actually realistic fully autonomous mission impervious to EW. You don’t just slap a raspberry pi on a drone, train it on ”people” then you’ve got a fucking T-1000 with rotors.https://youtu.be/Hu3p5ZR_i5sOoooh, so scary!!>>64686726Retard.This is the same sort of stuff I talked about, no shit there are actual uses for machine vision but being able to detect whether what it’s directly pointed at is a tank or not is not the same as being able to autonomously go attack a trench system.>>64688618Wrong, if that was the case they’d just make it go ”Am I within area X” and have area X defined as a clearly hostile area with a large margin of error with INS backup.
>>64681868>A duck wont kill you if you happen to miss itA goose on the other hand...
>>64681585>CheapChina tier nonsense. If our screws, nuts and bolts dont cost $100K each, if our toilets dont cost $100K each, then we're doing something wrong.
Post gear, discuss gear.Innawoods with doxycycline edition. (Dreaming of Spring.) Old: >>64643979
>>64689710This is a long one, sorry. If you're referring to the Militechs, they're around half the cost of 3810s and put on a decent-ish show (Buffman results table pic related) but they aren't as stout as the heavier, cheaper Alumina RF2. That one puts on a much better show against M855A1 (~20 hits stopped), which is ass backwards so I'm assuming the SiC they're using isn't very good. Comes with the territory. Plus, they've got a cheat ring and also come with the caveat of being uncertified Chinese plates from a company which could have gotten certified but did not for false reasons. Reason stated is that Chinese companies cannot be certified by the NIJ. That is false as seen with Longfri. You need to have an office in the US where the NIJ can go to collect samples for unannounced follow up "FIT" tests. The likely real reason is that Militech does not want any assets subject to US jurisdiction, which is alarming for an armor company. Test reports on Militech's site show BFD against 7.62x51mm M80 starting at 41mm shot #1, 41.6mm shot #2, N/A on shots #3-6 (so really you have to assume over 44mm, which is a fail), and most importantly no drop test. Overall not great but passable for cheapo armor. I think people are conflating Militech's plates with each other so some caution needs to be exercised with their lineup. Lastly, keep in mind Buffman is a Militech affiliate and it has to be assumed the plates they sent him were handpicked since they were going on video. Yours aren't.In this case I'd suck up the extra weight / cost and go with LTC 19513s or Hesco 3411s if you need A1 protection. It's about a pound more, with the Hesco being heavier, but those two plates are edge-to-edge. The Hesco is NIJ certified and dead nuts. The LTC stops M855A1 very easily but shot spacing is wide per the Apex / Hoplite 3-shot test.
>64689744As a clarifying follow-on to this post, the "US office" requirement is only for Chinese companies. There are Euro-based armor companies with no US presence that are NIJ-certified. There is no legitimate reason why Militech, after being in business for more than ten years, has zero NIJ certs. Guys like Adept have the same problem. They've had plenty of time and it is moronic to cut themselves out of BVP grant eligibility. NIJ certification is not that expensive relative to the benefits.I gotta make Militech an infographic.
>>64688117Yeah, mostly just tired of retarded speds trying to half ass reinventing a wheel that's already been established and proven. If he really wants a bando, he should look at kommandostore Eighty Four bandolier that can double as a chest rig. Problem solved
>>64686429I bought the top one from your picture a loooong time ago. The pouches on the sides were useless. After some time I ripped them off and sewed molle where they were. Sewed on a radio pouch too. The mag pouches are big. You can fit 3 aluminum mags in them. Been wearing it at matches for the last couple years. No durability issues. Good value for 50$ if youre able to sew a little.
>>64689744>>64689759Incredibly informative as always. Thank you
