Face it, modern problems are almost impossible for humans and AI to solve.
llm hallucinate and drift, the compute power is already there, they need backwards reproducibility and anti-drift built into the programming layer, corps are just too lazy, but trust me when i say compute already exist
>>16870141It's depressing
>>16870138Nah it's doable
>>16870138>Face it, modern problems are almost impossible for humans and AI to solve.Read Grothendieck. The rising sea concept.
>>16870138Just add some GPUs
>we still don’t have cure for common cold
>>16863536The cure is hot soup, tea, and rest in bed. Don't take pain relievers because those just prolong it.
>>16870564>most deadly bacteria>MRSAlel no I think MDR vibrio got MRSA lethality-mogged. I beat cutaneous MRSA with just a few weeks of doxycycline plus keflec.
>>16863536if you can vaxx covid you can vaxx a cold.https://www.bitchute.com/video/hvRoX959WIBH
>>16870676I stopped reading at lel
>>16870564The point is how its "antibiotic properties" can't even stop the botulinum growing on it.
Do you agree with this quote? Is becoming successful physicist considerably harder that becoming a good mathematician?
>>16871884I believe this, but who is the second and third and so on? I would like to see an extended list and the methodology for this "most cited" assessment
>>16871893>who is the secondRonald Kessler>and thirdGraham Colditz>I would like to see an extended list and the methodology Google Scholar, knock yourself out.
>>16871898I found an independent, indirect source for your claim. But this source is not about "most cited", but about "most tead" as in reading assignments, syllabi and other curricular materials drawn from thousands of colleges and universities around the world.https://analytics.opensyllabus.org/record/persons?
>>16871902Motherfucker do you have a Google Scholar account?
>>16871904Did i reject your suggestion to knock myself out with Google Scholar? I gladly will. I only thought you would have found a second opinion on the matter interesting, my mistake.
It's been 14 years since 4chan /sci/ posters solved a math open problem. Why has it been so long? What changed since 2011 that made 4chan users unable to solve math problems?We need to go back
Different demographic, 4chan is not 4chan
>>16871863I mean, we trained sand to do maths.Training a bunch of faggots to do the same couldn't be any harder than that.
>>16871863Go back and read threads from that era. There was some better top end content but most of it was just as worthless as what's discussed now. And /sci/ never touched the quality of the Space Elevator threads on /pol/. At least the "Why did he do it?" threads have stopped. Too bad the "Does 1 really equal 0.999..." threads are still common.
visit other sites
Physics = dead scienceChemistry = dead scienceBiology = dead scienceThe world is ruled by people who study psychology.Do you know anyone with C-PTSD?
>>16870456Donald Trump: degree in economics the Pope: degree in mathsElon Musk: degrees n physics and economicsBill Gates: dropped out of degree in maths
>>16870464Economics is applied psychology
>>16870456I like your pic. It illustrates how psychology is fake. I have every single symptom on the right but no one in their right mind would put my neuroticism stemming from a moderately shitty childhood side by side with people suffering from flashbacks of their buddies getting eviscerated and blown to bits.
>>16870507If Psychology is fake, then are all the psychological predictors of job outcomes fake joo data or something?
>>16870507>I have every single symptom on the rightEvery human has it, it needs to happen in a clinically significant level to be a diagnosis, just like how everyone experiences anxiety without having anxiety disorders.
The more I read between the lines regarding intent behind some of the scientific establishment the more I lean towards the opinion that there is a secret society of very rich and powerful people leveraging the skills of scientist for their own nefarious purposes.>Immortality researchBecause I'm rich and don't want to die.> Starlink, SpaceX, TeslaWill be used for Internet on mars, will be the ship used to get there, responsible for robotic transportation on Mars.Do you believe any of us will receive a starship escort there?>AICreating a new god, with the hopes that it solves all of our problems, will be controlled by the ultra wealthy.Palantir and the like for mass surveillance.I'm sure there's more, and you could begin making some connections, but these are just some parralels I've noticed on the fly regarding the most popular "leading frontiers of science".I'm sure the actual engineers doing the work at these companies aren't revealed the true intent of it.
>>16861929fpbp
>>16861952you preceive them as real problems because thats where the accademic interest lies because thats where the funding goes.How bluepilled are you?
>>16861952Because Elon's got a boner fantasy for colonizing Mars and being immortalized as a Colombus-like figure for the next 500 years.
>>16869758they dont think it be like it do
yes, it's guided by meI am the slopmaster
how do youbexplain fast radio bursts without sounding insane?
Ask a large language model.
i dont even know what a slow radio burst it senpai
>>16871838I got you, senpai.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W8r-tXRLazs
The internet is proof that we are able to build an artificial consciousness. All data and all memories are shared in the cloud. Any machine connected to this cloud is able to fetch whatever data whenever it wants from it.Through this cloud we can also remotely communicate. We are only restricted by the speed we type our messages in, but the machines send this info to the receiver almost instantaneously.Internet of Things is the collective unconscious of the machines. The machines are able to interact with each other without the need for an external command prompt (i.e. a human telling the machine to notice another machine or transmit data to it). Botnet might sound like a familiar concept.The transhumanists are building this same collective unconscious for humans - the Internet of Bodies. The usual suspects are to blame."Covid" was the catalyst for the IoB. It was all planned from the get-go and the vaccine was always the reason for this event. The vaccine is known to contain nanographeneoxide (NGO), which is able to interact with electromagnetic fields (EMF). Just type those two words into Scholar and you'll find quite a lot of papers about it. Remember when the 5G and microchip "conspiracies" first surfaced? It was the earlier days of the pandemic, before April 2020 iirc. This is all planned by them. They want to ridicule the whole concept with over blown lies (i.e. there is an physical chip in the vaxx, 5G causes covid etc.) in order to discredit the whole premise. But there is also a pinch of truth in every lie.The NGO is the chip which can be manipulated with correct 5G frequencies. Reddits favorite - Elon Musk - is building the 5G satellite network, which will cover the entirety of the world, no blind spots. The bi-yearly boosters are to ensure that you don't get overblown effects by too much NGO injected in a short span. It needs to settle to different organs, but most importantly the brain.
Feed this exact image into any capable large language model.Ask it to unpack the equation and key fully.Interface with the idea directly.That is all.
What does /sci/ think about crackpots discovering AI?
Implication: "Nothing exists outside A The Mind/Reality is hermetically sealed. There is no "external world" to blame for your problems. If you walk into a wall, the wall is also You.It frames existence not as a gift or a test, but as a high-stakes improvisation by a lonely God who has voluntarily forgotten He is God (δ), but has removed the safety nets (η,λ) to make the game real. If He wakes up (δ0), the game ends.you know llm are not conscious right, they are just a token chain, stop thinking they are some kind of thinking animal, most of the time the weights are dead
>>16871617I pray for singularity so their dear AI will have them being whipped and quartered for their lack of intellect.
>>16871237Multiplication isn't coherently defined for infinities because infinity is not a coherent value, it is the uppermost upper limit.
Repackaged Advaita
did these retarded ethanol huffing savages happen to discover Ultima Thule with their stargazing crystals or whatever the fuck their ancestors used before white people arrived? No, they didnt. so why the fuck should this random ass irrelevant indjun tribe get to name it? just because newsweek bitched about the original name that was given by the people who discovered the fucking thing?
Heya howa heya howa
>>16867861Ultima Thule was such a good fucking name too, with it being a contact binary. Also that indyun is whiter than me kek.
>>16867861Yeah Ultima Thule is a good name for an object in that location.What's the chug name? Arueshalae or something?
>>16870919>Ultima ThuleArrokoth
Panspermia Chads can't stop winning.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0InjvwBXTg
>>16871477The water was acidic?By Jove!
>>16871458How is panspermia incompatible with abiogenesis?Even if it didn't spontaneous arise on earth, It had to come from somewhere originally, so at some point it would have to spontaneously arise in order to be spread across the cosmos.
>>16871640don't think about it too hard, they didn't either
>>16871640>How is panspermia incompatible with abiogenesis?Panspermia is a postponed abiogenesis. It just claims that it happened somewhere else. (Stupid shit that explains nothing and should be shaved by a razor)
>>16871759>Stupid shit that explains nothingExcept of course for explaining how life can travel vast distances and how the extreme conditions necessary for the emergence of life need not have ever been present on earth and how the extreme time scales for life to evolve to the current conditions need not be accounted for with earth's time frame alone.
If we are in a simulation isn't the obvious direction to pivot to is research into observing extremely high energy particle events and things at the smallest pixels of our reality to try to force memory errors and frame rate stuttering to get hints of the language our reality was engineered in. If we pushed on enough outlier cases in the simulation where it is forced to process extreme computations instead of approximating it we might be able to reverse engineer the source code reality is written in piece by piece.Then from their create a malicious exploit
>>16869601Did you just read "If we are in a simulation" and write your reply without finishing OP's post or getting to anything about reverse engineering or exploit creation? >If you were to find the "bottom of everything" Who are you quoting and why do you think OP said anything about bottoming?
>>16869719>Programs or software can never access the source code of their hardwareThen why would you have said the hardware has source code if there is no code for the hardware?
>>16869834>uninspiredBut those clockworks and pneumatics are specifically inspired by actual physical mechanical inventions, not metaphysics. > it really is an expression of severe psychological issues.No, its an expression of the fact that reality inherently demonstrably enables the physical mechanics of clockworks and pneumatic, you are the one with psychological issues trying to wish those very real things away because you don't think those ideas lift your spirits enough.
>>16870079see>>16869245https://www.sott.net/article/301611-Living-in-the-Matrix-Physicist-finds-computer-code-embedded-in-string-theoryPhysicists are already on it, but corporate science won't talk about it until they can monetize it.
>>16870083>completely obvious reasons that only low IQ schizophrenics can't see.And midwits can't explain any of the "obvious reasons", they can only regurgitate derogatory cliches to anyone who questions their infallible knowledge.
I recently finished a personal project after months of introspection. Atm friends and I are calling it "Psychological Profile Mapping" (PPM).In essence, it's a framework to use in doing introspection. It's not a replacement for a clinician. We highly recommend taking it to a clinician actually. This is just another tool in your tool box. It's not an end all be all, just an earnest attempt to improve mental health and cut out a lot of wasted time and effort. An example of how a PPM could be useful:Say you are experiencing depressive symptoms while also having ADHD-like traits. Your depression may actually be related to dopamine issues and not serotonin. So taking an SSRI may not have any benefit, or could even be harmful. While taking an NDRI might relieve depressive symptoms on top of helping manage your ADHD-like traits. Being able to recognize your root issue is likely dopamine means you can skip the trial and error of antidepressants and go straight towards getting an ADHD evaluation. Handing your PPM to your clinician should help them see the logic behind it and be more inclined towards treating ADHD symptoms first instead of depression symptoms. (I write from personal experience as someone that got to end antidepressant trialing quickly and move to ADHD treatment for this reason)If you'd like a printable PDF, have any questions or would like to give feedback directly to me my discord is:odd.cogOtherwise, please offer your feedback here. Tear it apart if you want! We often learn more from critique. Right now our current improvement ideas are:>Including questions about internalized and externalized regulation in step 1.>Making a web version that is module-based, where responses in step 1 and 2 will result in suggested targeted modules in step 3. This is for people that may struggle with researching on their own.
>>16868644All my jp meme came from my friend's spammingNever actually watched him or read his stuff Tragically, I spent more time with Jung and Vaknin >>16868660Methylphenidate ER 54mg>>16869160Haven't seen that before thanksWith the web version it's mostly for people that struggle with noticing things about themselves. A baseline level of metacognition is almost a requirement from my experience thus far. But I've also learned people can train some awareness from genuinely attempting to engage even if their base level is low. At some point a lot of people just want to latch onto a framework of any kind. While that does instill some confidence, I'm equally worried about people getting too carried away into rabbit holes. Web modules can circumvent this issue by keeping the scope more narrow hopefully.
>>16868512How do i make a website like this that gaslights the users and tries to sell them supplements?
>>16869654Your Discord link doesn't work. Maybe the hacker known as 4chan added a filter against Discord links because of the spam.I've got a female friend (real female) with a probable ADHD and autism. She has 0 clues about herself. She's obviously extroverted, but she genuinely thinks she's introverted, for example. Introspection is very hard, and my guess is it's even harder for extroverted people because they spend less time with their own thoughts.
>>16869797I've had a few adds so far. My namefag tag is my discordMetacog some kind is a base requirement without intervention. But I've seen people with low metacog develop it over time. I'd recommend giving her some variation of an executive function questionnaire (pic related). If she has high extroversion she's likely to engage with it.
>>16869692Learn to vibe code.
What is the purpose of dreaming?Isn't it a waste of energy evolutionarily speaking?
>>16871682Which can result in numerous ill effects unlike the claim I am disputing >>16869930 that you are desperately trying to change the subject to avoid conceding with no success.
>>16871685I'm a different guy, this is my first response:>>16871644
>>16871688I didn't say it was originally your claim just pointed out that you are for some reason excessively desperate to defend it even though your first response just insinuates that the ill effects somehow go away by forgetting even though they clearly don't always do that and if your thesis were actually true, we wouldn't even have dreams in the first place since we would just forget them all to avoid possible ill effects.
>>16871689I don't think the problems are significant enough to result in dreams being lost.
>>16871696Your whole argument was specifically that dreams do get lost in order to avoid those problems, though.
Can somebody explain why fusion power is so great but The Matrix is unscientific?
heat loss
you don't have to feed the sun
