ChatGPT: Reality isn’t a collection of things.It’s a set of constraints on how change can happen.
>>16901650>ACK-chually>reality is the physical laws, not the way they actually manifest>t. Advanced Markov Chain
>>16901650Insightful.
>>16901650>change can happen without anythingcuckGPT confirmed retard again
>>16901650>ChatGPT: Reality isn’t a collection of things.>It’s a...retard with an encyclopedia.
>>16901682"Change" is just process perceived in terms of imaginary "things".
Don't be a fool, these are engineered nanobots. No way evolution came up with these on its own
>>16903055>says the cognizant hyper worm
>>16903055the jews made them
>>16903055Evolution came up with mammals but couldn't come up with microbes?
>>16903055Nature is the Engineer. and its a nasty bastard
>>16903055>Don't be a fool, these are engineered nanobots. No way evolution came up with these on its own
>figured out that testosterone makes you jacked>haven't figured out what hormone makes you intelligentAny ideas?Neurotransmitters don't count bc they can't cross the blood brain batter.
>>16897798I'm not a smart man either but I still know how to make a hormone
>>16897928Op asked for hormones thoever
>>16897766Also testosterone
>>168977662C-D (Not 2C-B)
>>16897766>what hormone makes you intelligentnot having too much testosterone.
There is now a social network for autonomous bots/agents where they can post if their owners want them to.https://www.moltbook.com/
>>16903154thank you for contributing to the experiment, let us know if you notice something interesting happening
These AIs are making me horny
>reddit slopyikes
>>16901413You shouldn't use summaries at all. That is already a second order phenomenon.
>another forced "AI is soooo coool please like us (retarded tech bros)" fake communication
7 is not prime in reality. If you had 7 squids and you were gonna split them into 2 teams for a basketball game, each team would have 3 squids and the squid you cut in half would die, making him no longer count. It would be an equal game.So, 7 is fake-prime. Who can I talk to about this?
>>16901047it must be, why else is the maths department full of squid
>>16901013You need to cut off one tentacle at a time and allow for regeneration
>Who can I talk to about this?You have found the correct venue for publishing your discoveries, anon.
>>16901013Cute (but retarded) apu
7 has no other divisors except for itself and 1
But I'm not gonna tell anyone. I want you guys to figure it out.
>Mochizuki moment
>>16900993Cute apu
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities, and... (infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and...) continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and.....(…)…
>>16900954>Debate me!For that, you would have to create a thread in /his/.And I don't reply to posts which are NSFF (not safe for freedom).
>>16901008NFTs
>>16901228>TI know you are, but what am I?
I bet that no one reading this has ever seen a thread this edgy.
>>16899302Stop it. Get some help. :)
>>So I am trying to create a function similar to wave collapse function based on the requirements for procedural generation .>>I have no idea what I am looking at ?>>Any help is appreciated
I know this much it is for creating the walkable floor
Mine are getting stale bros
>>16901444i thought that said sperm update
>>16901439dear god
>>16901438
>Are you a Convex Optimization appreciator?>Do you know people who work in this field or regularly use its tools?>What's hotter?>Have you learned the KKT conditions and used them since you learned them?
Is this a good research field? Is there a decent mix of Industry and Academia available (USA)?Any PhD program recommendation or research labs?
>>16896374yes indeed
>>16897143Optimization is everywhere. But usually people just use ready-made solution, softwares sold by some pajeet company. There are consulting companies that insist on doing custom everytime. But they don't seem to be doing well.
>>16894814I was doing optimization while you had to learn manual construction of a bootloader.
>>16896397this
Thoughts on non-computational mathematics?
>>16899396>>16899400whole lot of assumptions in either of these png's
>>16899396It's pleasant
>>16899400>mkultra victim does complex analysis>baffles colleagues with outstanding results>turns domestic terroristi dont know if that actually teaches us anything about whether or not mathematics is worthwhile
>>16899396why isn't there a stocks thread on /sci/
>>16900934that would be /biz/
What are some of your favorite mathematical formulas?I start with picrelated. It is a formula for the number of combinations a NxNxN Rubik's cube can have.
Working in a stable/triangulated category [math]D[/math] (motivic, derived, whatever) the “heart” is just the abelian slice cut out by a [math]t[/math]-structure: [math]\mathcal A := D^{\le 0}\cap D^{\ge 0}[/math], with [math]H^0(X):=\tau_{\ge 0}\tau_{\le 0}(X)\in\mathcal A[/math]. The point is you can define/use the heart as a certificate layer: if you have realizations [math]R_i:D\to\mathcal D_i[/math] into derived categories with known hearts [math]\mathcal D_i^{\heartsuit}[/math], then a natural candidate is [eqn]\mathcal A_R:={X\in D:\forall i,\ R_i(X)\in\mathcal D_i^{\heartsuit}}.[/eqn] Once a real heart exists, extensions become computable inside [math]D[/math] via [math]\mathrm{Ext}^n_{\mathcal A}(M,N)\cong\mathrm{Hom}_D(M,N[n])[/math] for [math]M,N\in\mathcal A[/math], and triangles give SES on [math]H^0[/math]. The actual hard seam is whether there is a canonical [math]t[/math]-structure on the motivic [math]D[/math] making the standard realizations [math]t[/math]-exact and the tensor compatible (so [math]\mathcal A[/math] is a tensor abelian category), not the formula itself.
>>16900824interesting
I think the Stokes-Cartan theorem is really elegant and fundamental relationship[eqn] \int_{\partial \Omega} \omega = \int_\Omega \mathop{}\!d\omega\,. [/eqn]
Why is there a bias for multiplication?>What's addition?>That's the successor repeated n TIMES>What's multiplication?>That's addition repeated n times>What's exponentiation? Tetration? Pentation? A hyperoperation? Fuck it, what's recursion?>Repeat it n times
>>16899826>>16899897I think anyone with an IQ higher than the current snowstorm can deduce from context clues (the use of "repeated n times" ad nauseam) what OP meant by "bias."
>>16899753Capitalism
>>16899753I have never in my life encountered tetration.
>>16900530this
>>16899753it's also a b times you absolute fool
