I don't believe there is anything of "what it's like" to "be" another person. Nor do I believe there is anything of "what it's like" to even "be" me. The ego is an invention of Cartesian philosophers. If I am truly "conscious" as these philosophers describe consciousness, then I should be able to project my mind across time and space in an instant like a god. But I cannot even be conscious of myself five minutes ago. I cannot recall to mind my memory of five minutes ago and relive my supposed conscious experience. I have no way to prove I even existed five minutes ago, or that I will exist five minutes hence. Do "I" even exist at all? I must conclude: no.
>>16874146so what arrived at that conclusion?
'provable' is a smaller subset of 'true'
Feed this exact image into any capable large language model.Ask it to unpack the equation and key fully.Interface with the idea directly.That is all.
>>16871617I pray for singularity so their dear AI will have them being whipped and quartered for their lack of intellect.
>>16871237Multiplication isn't coherently defined for infinities because infinity is not a coherent value, it is the uppermost upper limit.
Repackaged Advaita
>>16871237Full send, this is nonsense.>t. mathfag
i hate schizos so fucking much bros
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DydIhwLrbMk
>>16873466not him but the portal ends half way on the cube such that both halves are touching the ground
>>16873491Correct. Looks like SHM would occur until the block equalizes into half on blue half on orange.
>>16873491So forces from objects would transfer to panels portals are on?In this case, would situation in the pic related happen? On the left is the regular empty box without the top part, on the right is hollow box with blue portal inside which is bolted to the ground, and box with equal weight with orange portal outside (which is free to move).
>>16873759Consider the case where the portals are different boxes. The orange box being the input would be stationary and it would be the blue box moving. The user would feel a tension on their arm and this motion of the blue box would be proportional to this tension. Something like a direct drive joystick could be created. Consider the case of a rod being inserted into the portals as shown where the ends of the rods are some interference fit - the rod is longer that the distance between the portals. One person held one end of the rod while the other one pushed them together.Does the rod fall over when they both let go?Inherent to the portal is a unique self-interference of portal-objects. The source of this interference originates from the portal, but the portal-object surface in question can be some distance away from the portal. In this case, the practicalities of tension make a perfect orientation unlikely and the rod is likely to tip by similar mechanisms of treefelling. But engineered geometries could create self-tension analogous to phase locking in superconduction.. The rod would not change orientation relative to the portals even if the box were tossed about. This would have to be outside of a strong gravitational field or other force acting non-uniformly on the rod. What happens if such a rod is set up as such in portals that are on plunging surfaces. What happens when the portals are brought closer together?
>>16873491Makes no sense. The blue portal hitting the cube is the same as the cube hitting the steel floor. The blue portal sheet (steel floor beneath the orange portal) hits the top of the cube and stays there. >>16873759There is no force on the orange portal's box. It doesn't move. >>16874035Your diagram sucks. I don't understand the situation.
I'll give you a free (you) if you can come up with a math puzzle that an average college grad with a math degree can solve within 15 minutes, but the top AIs cannot (gemini-3-pro, gpt-5-high [1] ). No images. No spelling gotchas. Normal math that would be appropriate for a textbook.You can run these models for free on https://lmarena.ai (choose "Direct Chat") Post a screenshot of these models failing if you can come up with such a puzzle.[1] Seems to be smarter than gpt-5.2-high
>>16873849>It's already beating IMO gold medalists.It's all so tiresome.
>>16873882Competitors spend a bunch of times studying the problems and workflows, such that the problem is generally a chain-function of parameterized links.They aren't doing research. Mathematical prowess isn't even of particular note. It is more like swift pattern recognition or path-finding that is tested. And this doesn't have good bearing mathematically because of combinatorics. One isn't going to iteratively stumble upon to solutions in general. It would take too long. Yes, this is an attack on AI as well.
>>16871152You keep saying this, and yet you keep coming back.
>>16873882YOU are hallucinating. OpenAI was sent problems from the last IMO within minutes after it ended, and solved them with the same constraints as humans do. Its knowledge cutoff is way in the past.DeepSeek also solved IMO, and it's open-source, so one can check its methodology.>>16874011>I never even read an IMO-level problem, let alone try to solve one.
>>16874049You have obviously never participated in IMO extracurricular. My description is accurate. Don't cope and sneed because you have to believe in AI.
Hello /sci/ is fusion real? Saw this on /pol/ and I always thought that it was fake, but I am not the brightest bulb on the tree.https://sys.4chan.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Fbusiness%2Fdeals%2Ftrump-media-tae-technologies-merger-ai-fusion-power-b9ac22a5
Its not real as long as people in economic positions say it's not real.
>>16873680Lol.
>>16873686spbp>>16873680fuck you glow nigger
>>16873678if you're dumb, do yourself a favor and stay off brainrot like /pol/and pro tip: /sci/ is one of the dumbest places on the entire internet
It's real. But it's just a scam. He merges with them and the government will give them 25bil to develope that nuclear fusion. Most of the money will be stolen.
Life is short and you only get one chance to see the end of the world.
I unironically believe in reincarnation.
>>16873778I unironically believe in ExoIncarnation
>>16873768How many black cocks do you think have blasted cum into his tight jewish asshole?>>16873778Me too. I kinda wish I didn't...
>>16873778Unironically isn't a word.
I don't understand why the author states that we can divide the elements of M into 8 classes, what stops us from dividing them into 9 classes instead. There are no restrictions on how many times we multiply the same prime right? The book is "A Walk Through combinatorics" by Miklos Bona. (I will post the solution given by the book below)
>>16873965Write out the prime factorization of an element of M, and consider the parity of each exponent. For each of these exponents, there are two options - odd or even - and since there are only three primes less than 6, this gives 2^3=8 possible exponent parity combinations. Then by the pigeonhole principle, since M has 9 elements, at least two of them must have the same exponent parity combination. The product of two such elements is then a perfect square.
>>16873971Thanks a lot, I understand the solution now.
>>16873986I didn’t even understand the question.
>>168739652, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2
[math]\[\text{Since no element of } M \text{ has a prime divisor } >6,\ \text{every } m\in M \text{ has prime factors only in } \{2,3,5\}.\]Hence we can write uniquely\[m = 2^{a}3^{b}5^{c}\qquad (a,b,c\in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0}).\]Define the parity vector\[\pi(m) := (a\bmod 2,\; b\bmod 2,\; c\bmod 2)\in \{0,1\}^3.\]There are only \(2^3=8\) possible values of \(\pi(m)\), but \(M\) contains \(9\) integers. By the pigeonhole principle, there exist distinct \(x,y\in M\) such that\[\pi(x)=\pi(y).\]Write \(x=2^{a}3^{b}5^{c}\) and \(y=2^{a'}3^{b'}5^{c'}\). ThenComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Don't give out advice, don't reply to the schizofag... unless you're bored.
my left ear has been ringing for 6 hours now, tinnitus shitthought it would pass at first but it just keeps goingshould i just sleep on it or try something?
>>16874027probably infected
>>16874027HIV, it's inoperable
>>16874033>>16874041i can't die now, i have shit to do next week
>>16839978I'm neurodivergent and can't get a formal diagnosis because medicine is retarded and shit and only deals with symptoms instead of the actual problem causing the symptoms so I'm pretty much fucked and can't find help so life sucks for me haha
This is the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall, the largest known structure in the universe, a massive galaxy filament stretching about 10 billion light-years across. This breaks the laws of physics as we know it. The Cosmological Principle says no matter where you are in the universe if you look in any direction you should see an even distribution of matter this in turn creates a limit for the sizes of objects. It's about 1.2 billion light yearsmeaning that this structure is 8 times the supposedly limit of the largestobject possible.
>>16869804I think the easiest answer to a lot of cosmological discrepancies is that the Big Bang was not constant. Starting the universe might of been more like starting the engine of an old car, it took a couple of tries and the oscillations from the last few attempts are still around.The one that does actually bug me is the Hubble Tension, that aspect of the universe should have already sorted itself out by now even if the Big Bang was messy.
>draws conclusions on visable mass>85% of reality is unvisable mass
>>16869804And it’s in Hebrew letters
>>16869826>and call that a strucutre. Or you could just join up multiple filamnets and call it one big structure.Filaments are the same structure as open-cell foam. The void "expands" and the mass in the filament collapses gravitationally.
>>16871084it is ad-visable to spell 'visible' correctly, though.
It's impossible for aging to be cured in the next 500 years, if it were even theoretically possible.
>>16868051>It's impossible for aging to be cured in the next 500 years, if it were even theoretically possible.It's probably going to happen within the next 100 years or so. It's a very complex problem, but it's fairly well identified by now. It'll NEVER be a single therapy; you're looking at around 500+ targeted interventions to ack-shilly get to negligible senescence, but Bryan Johnson is vaguely credibly half way there.>>16868209>blah blah Marxist propagandaI'm already approaching six figures on supplement spending, and clankers are saying I look 12-13 years too young. I'm on more supplements than Bryan Johnson, and you're just coming off prole-coded, kek.>>16868347>>16868502The adrenochrome thing is a hoax. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas got Adrenochrome right except that it's easy to make from an Epi-Pen plus air.>>16869741Largely CIRBP for bowhead whales, would not surprise me if the Greenland sharks have a lot too.>>16869798Not exactly a hoax, but the Schizo Yarmulke factor experiments are only doubling the lifespans of mice so far, not any closer to a "cure" for aging than Bad Luck Bryan's stack. There are interventions like Helichrysum italicum Hydrolate functioning as broader-spectrum Yamanaka inducers than DWS's stack, and it's smarter to just skip all that and induce GSTA4 downstream, kek.>t. read Sinclair's Schizo Yarmulke factor paper on eye regeneration
>>16868051You only need to stop the aging for the brain if you are ok with being a cyborg
>>16868051What if it was, just hypothetically, already cured?But not in us, in 8000 year old mummies.And what if, just hypothetically, those mummies genetic code was sequenced 30 years ago?And what if, just hypothetically, various people are already being treated with genetic therapies based on these ancient gene sequences?
>>16872585PS: Look for drastic hair and eye color lightening in wealthy individuals.
>>16870060You can’t buy capsules of Helichrysum italicum on Amazon.
>MIT physics and nuclear-science professor and director of MIT's Plasma Science and Fusion Center shot to death at his Brookline condoWho else is next?
>>16873801Why are the Portuguese so violent? We should never have imported them to America
>>16873539>>16873801>Jealous of your peer from uni>Dropped out of Brown's physics program >Shoot up a bunch of random students at brown >Go to MIT and gun down your peer>Commit sudoku I can understand jealousy. But why kill random students at brown? What did they do to him
>>16872412>If let's say he was leaking info to China, then he would either forced to leak fake info or prosecuted by trialAll of that takes time and effort. Sometimes the best way to deal with (percieved) spies/traitors is to just shoot them. Just pop a cap in that nigga's ass. Capeesh?
>>16873918General rage that wasn't satisfied by the first shooting so it became focused rage. When that didn't sooth his soul, he self deleted, ending the rage.
>>16873918Maybe he went full schizo and believed that he needed to carry out certain missions. We make fun of the internet schizos who post their delusions for months or years on end but the real world manifestations can be pretty scary.
Only legend pro max can solve this
>>16871856The fucking 6k miles would break in and ripe the jar into pieces. Because there was vacuum before. Flies where levitating.
>>16870776WHAT IF WE OPEN THE JAR???
>>16871861>the new captcha.
>>16871664Sybau nigga
>>16872409this shit always cracks me up
my level of respect for this man is falling RAPIDLY
>>16872193You see a dangerous career criminal.I see a poor young engineer in making
>>16872714Ideologically compromised tranny cultist
>>16872830I know you are but what am I
>>16872671The reason why the core and mantle of the planet are so hot? Lol
>>16872079He's one of those ecelebs for whom I've never been able to even click on a single video, despite being a youtube whore. There's something intangibly fake and gay about him. I just know all his shit is pure slop.
Quantum physics is fake.
>>16873560Is a metal wire touching a piece of germanium or silicon a reptilian tech?
>>16873542>Quantum physics is fake.You can count on it.
>>16873560Voodoo
>>16873542We've known for some time now that if we take the quantum physicists away then quantum physics will continue working. I think it's time to take them away.
>>16873542The opposite. QM is correct, it's General Relativity that works merely by sheer luck.
what's the best theory of your own that you've ever come up with? did it pan out?
my theory was that this board was all hack psued virgin incels. After years of testing and collating data it proved to be correct
>>16873340this guy is a sex-haver gigachad, he is better than all of us
>>16873253I do believe that the speed of light changes but nothing else does.
the big bang is inside whatever the event horizon of a white hole would be. Instead of all paths through time and space moving towards the singularity, all paths through time and space move away from it
>>16873253Law of explosion says a logical contradiction always leads to a deductive explosion.x=-x is the arithmetic description of a self-contradicting (ie self-negating) arithmetic logic element.Arithmetic axioms mandate the logical contradiction x=-x at x=0 because 0=-0 thus 0 can only be described as an oxymoronic valueless value.As a paradoxical consequence of 0=-0 as an origin number, completion of the arithmetic system necessitates leaps of the imagination that introduces complexity which infers x=-x for all x:x = x*1 = sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1) = x*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = x*i*i = x*i^2 = -x. Arithmetic is a numerical explosion of logic, all statements of truth made by arithmetic are trivial truths among infinite truths because its original number is a self negating logical contradiction that imbues self contradiction upon all values.The Standard Model of Physics is an emergent property of arithmetic by way of geometry, any models produced by physics, such as strings, rings, lies, groups, manifold, quantum foam or ultimately big bang, rely on arithmetic that is irrational at its core 0=-0 and not an accurate reflection of nature, by definition of logical contradiction and through the consequences described by the law of explosion.Total incoherence is at the most extreme poles where zero and infinity might as well be equivocated in their trivial projections.0 = 0 x 0 x ...infinity = infinity x infinity x ...Arithmetic/Physics is either illogical and irrational without making completely measurable predictions about nature or nature is illogical and irrational without being hindered by paradox or quantification predictions being infinitely trivial.This is why the best physics explanation is called a big bang, it is not a big natural bang, but a big numerical bang of arithmetic, geometric, physics, ..., inf, etc explosion based on a logical contradiction.
