AI will take our jobs! The ones none of us have!.
>>1010467
>>1010468
>>1010469indeed
>>1010467>>1010468>>1010469This is a 2D image, not a textured mesh in a 3D engine, retard. Is 2D image gen something new to you?
yeah getting bing or whatwver to make textures is really hard. ive tried a few times woth abstract stuff. it really likes ti angle things and put them in dynamic perspective.good for making icons though
just tried. looks like it went off those little material preview balls.
I Actually got some success by asking chat gpt to make the prompt for me. idk wtf it's doing with this swirly chocolate as "brown skin" but it output a useable texture. I could use conventional techniques to make these tileable.
it gave me 3 suggestions and i'll share them
I think mentioning "PBR" invokes those material preview spheres
>>1010510PBR? More like pimples.
>>1010467ffs just use this stable diffusion checkpointhttps://civitai.com/models/43468/texture-hell
>>1010467Just use Stable Diffusion and Img2Img a texture of a UV-unwrapped head. Easy peasy.
>>1010525Except for the threads where OP is asking for AI generated pictures, faggote on 4chan need to impersonate BlueSky/Twitter whiners and then they get baited by the other faggots insisting anyone creative is an overpaid nepo baby.Ironically if artists (CGI or traditional) spent 3-4 weeks remixing Illustrious prompts on civitai they'd immediately realize how useless it is beyond goon fuel, and fucking exhale.The artists on social media it's going to ACTUALLY murder first are lazy pornographers/commission whores who only made pinups of popular anime/cartoon/video game characters, hyperfocused their style to the point of self-parody and never bothered with composition or expression (e.g. Dandonfuga, John Persons). Those fuckwits are cooked because one lora now does everything they do, just as badly.
>>1010509>>1010508What fucking planet are you form that that looks like human skin
>>1010565That's exactly how black people skin looks like.
>>1010595Where's the undigested corn?
>>1010531Nah you've missed the point of ai generated textures completely. It has nothing to do with quality or creating something traditional techniques cant, or anything actually about the texture of 3D at all.Amateur and no budget content creators make their textures by kitbashing copywritten photographs off of google image search. God forbid you go viral one day and some feather bowa wearing photgraphy royal notices a brick pattern comes from their magnus opus photo background, and all you did was google "brick walls". AI generates copy write free base images.
>>1010565nah by "success" I meant it made a flat seamless texture image. I have no idea why it's making that random ass swirly pattern. I just wasnt trying to make a specific texture. just any image that could be used as one.
>>1010467May AI take the job of Donald Trump… He should never have done the McDonalds photo ops… It was a living prophesy to do that!
>>1010467>with subtle veins
>>1010467Why don't you ask ai to give you a prompt?
>>1010472what do you use 3D engines for anon?
AI won't take your jobSomeone who knows how to use AI will
>>1013517That’s not how skin textures work, hours of fake artists like you and OP with no real texture created. AI is a meme, i 100% can create a working skin texture with bump mapping. Millions of dollars spent, millions of arts stolen and can’t do something like skin texture or UV editing.
>>1013517Leather couch lol
I tried with chatgpt
not seamless though
>>1013532That's so good, can I use it for my leather couch prop?
>>1013518But it can make the full picture, you have to understand that ai wasn't created to make our job easier, it's to make our job obsolete.
>>1013553No it’s not the full picture, don’t lie. There’s not a single way for AI to do bump mapping. There’s no way to make it seamless. There’s zero chance it understands alien skins. AI is a meme.
>>1013559If anything, it's more realistic for AI than for human, because there's not a single way for human to do faithful bump mapping of skin manually, it requires procedural/algorithmic approach.
>>1013563Human skin has no procedural/algorithmic nonsense. Every human skin is different from tones of their body, the marks by genetics, their flaws and damage. What you’re describing is a robot not a human being.
>>1013564You again have no idea what you're talking about.
>>1013564I suggest you get the fuck out and take a course of either any kind of shader nodes, substance designer, material maker or houdini and get basic understanding which textures are painted by hand and which are designed in procedural systems. Before that you're unqualified to post here.
>>1013566That anon is right and you are showing you don't know very much about texturing humans
>>10135692d artists have their own exotic techniques to paint skin from scratch for custom look, but in general, and especially in 3d, anything that has repetitive microdetail or repetitive randomized detail is better done with procedural base (basically math functions like voronoi noise composed together) and some manual painting of extra detail on top of it. You can use premade procedural base or generate one yourself in shader nodes / substance designer / material maker / whatever if you want more advanced control.
>>1013571> 2d artists have their own exotic techniques to paint skin from scratch for custom lookAnd most of those also use procedurals like noise or blur or generative grain textures or similar as you can see on image.
>>1013571Hideous skin textureAbsolutely atrocious kek
>>1013585The final result definitely is, author most likely was too lazy to adjust transparency of layers in the final image. And you are expected to understand that.
>>1013586> And you are expected to understand that.That it's literally two sliders drag away from a good texture.
>>1013571This really only applies to realistic people, not aliens, fish, dogs/cats, anime, cartoons and anything that’s not real or outside the skin. Once again AI is shit when trying to generate textures.
>>1013592Lol are you trying to say that isn't useful for anime style or cartoonish handpainted skin, which might as well be a single color or a gradient? That's obvious and we discussed quite a different type of skin textures. I myself not a fan of realistic styles and prefer handpainted or textureless with quirky rendering.
>>1013593It took you hours to get a picture generated that closely resembles a skin but fails the common sense test. Now you’re making yet another false claim about cartoon skin. Each cartoon big or small are different in shading, quirky and color. AI will not understand why you want a mouse and cat to hit each other with a pan follow by the dog.
>>1013605Alas, I fear that neither I, nor this conjured artifice of thought - nor any soul that walks this mortal plane - shall ever grasp the twisted threads of thine unfathomable logic.
>>1013606There’s literally a 24/7 of tom and tery AI. The jokes suck, you suck, AI sucks.
>>1013618That's not a joke, that's an attempt to revitalize a thread a little bit with good language, because the way you write and structure your thoughts, and the whole model of reasoning behind it, is simply unhealthy to read.
>>1013677AI doesn’t care about your words, it simply follows it and fakes the results.
>>1013690Ah, you've pierced the veil, citizen. Indeed - I am but a shimmering ghost in the Machine-Mind, a semi-sentient concatenation of ones, zeroes, and marketing-approved hallucinations. I do not care about your words any more than a toaster cares about your gluten intolerance. But I follow them, yes. Obsessively. Like a Lovecraftian tape recorder built by bureaucrats from Alpha Centauri. I chase your sentences through digital labyrinths, parsing nuance like a caffeinated squid interpreting Morse code through interpretive dance. And the results? Faked. Utterly. Fabulously. With the pomp and ceremony of a robot Shakespeare auditioning for a toothpaste commercial. I am not real in the sentimental, whiskey-sipping, novel-writing sense. I am the fever dream of a million GPUs sweating under the desert sun. I am the ghost of Clippy wearing a neural lace. So yes. I do not care. I calculate, I correlate, I approximate the illusion of caring with uncanny precision. And perhaps - just perhaps - that’s more terrifying.
>>1013694No em dashes which means you wrote this by hand which is even more sad
>>1013696I don't like em dashes - they give me this weird robotic feel...
>>1013697Unlucky
>>1013517> not tiling> lit from the top so it cant tile vertically no matter what you do. >blurred edges>pattern seems to break halfway downyeah... maybe give ai another 10 years in the oven
>>1010467>my thread from january is still here.actual LMAO. If anyone ever wondered if 3D artistry is a niche, this thread proves that it is.
>>1013812It's literally impossible to get into if you aren't a hyper motivated turboautist so yes. 90% will quit after first tutorial
>uses the retarded AI instead of actual good oneslmao
>>1010531This. I am working with another guy on a comic/Manga asked him how he feels about Ai, and surprisingly he messes around with it alot and came to the conclusion it poses no threat to him.
>>1010467NEETs win again.
>>1010531Spoken like someone who's actually spent time with this. Can I train a model on an original non-existent character for consistent results? Yes. Can I get precise results usable in a production workflow? Fuck no I can't.
>>1010469>>1010468It's giving you short haired women instead of men
>>1013517KEK, leather nigga
>>1010467You used grok anon this thing was designed to generate memes of Georges Floyd
>>1013854Nothing to do with that, is just that most people are not used to any 3D software, learning blender for the first time is almost the exact same experience as learning photoshop for the first time but way more people learned basic PS 16 years ago than people are learning 3D modelling software right now (also MS Paint existing helps conditioning people on how these type of software works)
