Is it possible to make things like this in Blender or is there another program? I want to create psychedelic liquid simulations like this
>>1018217We have Adobe After Effects at home
>>1018217looks like Houdini type shit
houdini just added a 2d fluid solver inside their compositing network and it looks a lot like this
>>1018217It's probably possible in Blender, but it's not a one click solution and I don't know how to do itIf that's all you want to make you should learn Houdini
>>1018217Yes you can do it in blender, it's not that complicated but it's easier to do in Houdini
considering the smears don't really move around I think you could do it in blender >glass or emitter shader?>geonodes or shapekey the distortion on the glass object>key frame adjustments to your shader for desired effectsfilm grain looks like dogshit in your video though and I wouldn't want to replicate that. It doesn't look authentic and the "vibe" shit only works on social media. What is your piece saying? what's happening? the light dims but the distortion is incoherent and meaningless and lacks form and structure. If your point is that it's meant to lack those things then you need to go to art school to understand how to implement form and structure coherently in things that are intended to break form and structure. It just looks like mush without a purpose or message. Keep working at it though I'm sure you'll find your vision
>>1018267Lies, Blender can’t handle sfx and always lags. It’s not even built for CGI effects like After Effects or real life. When will you cultists learn.
>>1018282Nobody cares about your skill issues schizo. If you can't do it get better and stop complaining
>>1018298You literally described the OP gif has awful content and suggests different answer. The gif was featuring something only Adobe Effects can achieve. Only a amateur like you would never know because you never went to school to learn real skills that have students practicing Adobe products.
>>1018303>The gif was featuring something only Adobe Effects can achieve.Again, if you lack the skills is nobody else's problem except yours. Op asked if he could do it with blender and the answer is yes, we all know that you can't do it, you don't need to keep remaining us
>>1018304>YoU CaN dO iT>No such feature exists>Claims nonsenseYour claim of using glass/emitter or geonodes/shapekey doesn’t work. Easy test that I conducted myself didn’t provide the same gas level you see in OP gif.Maya on the other hand does. It offers gas like texture, control of temperature, fading and rendering in 8K resolution.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU1v1yYm4TcBlender failed and you look like an idiot.
Besides the second source that shows up out of nowhere it looks achievable with a basic sim that has static velocity field. Many ways to go about adding the 'second source' on the right though (Cheating would be the easiest)
>>1018305Can you stop talking retarded shit that doesn't make sense? Are you having a mental breakdown or something?The word you are looking for is CFD solver, you can use an add-on on blender or geonodes, what Op is showing is fluid dynamics on a permeable surface.Stop sperging and let the adults talk
>>1018307Again, no you can’t and i did do everything possible to get a result. You are the one who is speaking nonsense, no gif to back it up. You don’t know how special effects work, you just some noob that thinks it’s easy.
>>1018310You are clearly retarded, this is a fluid dynamics simulation, no special effects.Use a cdf solver add on or geonodes, if you don't know what you are talking about just let grown ups talk.
>>1018314Liquids don’t dissolve in 3D idiot, you’re suggesting something that doesn’t exist in Blender or its addons. You once again proven that you don’t have experience to understand why there’s different colors of water being transparent. Basic science tells you that water heat matches the other water. You can not replicate temperature in Blender like Maya can.
>>1018328You're beyond saving retard.
>>1018328blendlets are retarded, don't bother
>>1018329Still no gif after so many replies claiming it’s easy. Well anon you said>I think you couldSo not even you are that confident.
>>1018328Is this some kind of bot?
>>1018346Unfortunately that's a human being
>>1018346>>1018353>Believes 3D liquids can mimic real life
>>1018353It's scary that people like that aren't on some place where they can get help >>1018355I know I'm talking with an insane person but for the rest who's interested what op is showing is a fluid dynamics simulation, more specific fluid dynamics on a permeable surface, to do this you need a CFD solver, you can use an open source solver or you can make a 2 dimensional flow solver on geonodes, it's totally doable.
>>1018361You keep saying that but you still haven’t uploaded any gif. Plus i’m 100% sure this is just Adobe After Effects vision heat map effects. A simple google search and YouTube tutorial showed the same effect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZOj77wja_gNot hard to consider it being this effect because the water drop does cool down. Someone must have used a bad phone camera and caused the random noise.You can’t debunk this blender cultist, not even 3D is powerful enough to randomize the shape into nearly pixel interactions. I worked on these projects before you even had become a cultist, 3D effects isn’t worth it 70% of the time. They are all fancy items and drawings people come up with.
>>1018310>i did do everything possible to get a resultdid you try gitting gud?
>>1018366maybe if you spent less time bitching on /3/ and got to fucking work you wouldn't have to beg anons to do it for you
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v14/10
>>1018369>>1018371Blender cultist insulting experts, still no gif. We know Maya can do it because Bifrost is realistic and Maya offers color temperature. After Effects can easy achieve it with vision heat map effect.Blender can not do it, there is no plugin for it, no temperature or color control, not good enough to achieve the same simulation effect and was not built for SFX just like everything else you people falsely claimed.
>>1018386You are so mad schizo, I can feel the enraged screeches coming from my monitor.Raging lunatic Check the link from this anon >>1018373Btw I'm always right, it's my curse.
>>1018392Your curse is being gullible, the simulation of the physical droplet was done in a custom designed environment with programming language. It is not 3D, there was no software that can simulate the same process.You have zero understanding and the scientific community doesn’t agree with your opinion. We were talking about a way to create an artificial event that mimics the study. Not recreate the exact same thing. Just like guns, bombs, water and the world, CGI is art another view, not the real one.
