[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: freecad.png (66 KB, 333x369)
66 KB
66 KB PNG
so i design stuff with Blender for 3d-printing. Lately a friend asked me to design some mechanical parts for printing and I realized Blender isn't suitable for this, because when you apply a subdivision modifier, all the dimensions change because the geometry gets deformed. I was going to learn freecad but i watched some people doing stuff with it on youtube and every time i watch a video i say to myself "i could model this in Blender in like half the time." is this the nature of CAD modeling, or is this specific to freecad?
>>
>>1021898
3d printing stuff is more of a >>>/diy/ thing, they'll be much more knowledgeable than here
>>
>>1021900
thanks
>>
>>1021898
try solvespace
>>
>>1021898
Blender isn’t designed for CAD, please stop. The 3D printing was only simple objects, we know you didn’t do anything constructive if you’re complaining about simple gear design.
>>
>>1021898
Blender does suck ass for that, but also just dont subdivide? Why do you need to do that at all
>>
>>1021898
There is a CAD thread here >>993073
I believe FreeCAD has a very steep learning curve compared to other CAD softwares

For 3D printing you could stick to Blender, there are tips and tricks to make it better, but not knowing CAD will hold you back if you ever want to CNC something
>>
>>1021904
looks good, might try it for a bit

>>1021931
when you model something with a hole or a round shape, you want a subd modifier so it prints like an actual round shape instead of a hexagon.

>>1021934
thanks.
i agree freecad is a pain in the butt to model simple things.
>>
File: 14-11_11-51.png (190 KB, 1572x920)
190 KB
190 KB PNG
>>1021935
>when you model something with a hole or a round shape, you want a subd modifier so it prints like an actual round shape instead of a hexagon.
Remember you're not making an asset for a render, or game or animation. It's for 3D printing.
You want a smooth hole, you create a cylinder with 256 edges (or more if it's a big hole) and you boolean that out. You want smooth edges, you bevel them.

And for the love of god, never turn smooth shading on.
>>
>>1021898
AFAIK there is no decent free CAD modeler.
FreeCAD's modeling is a pain in the ass, I basically only use FreeCAD when I need FEM simulations.
The cheapest CAD tool I know of that you can buy is Plasticity ($175) followed by Rhino ($1000), the others are all SAAS trash.
>>
>>1021941
I believe Fusion360 has a free license; I don't know how limited it is
>>
>>1021941
Solid Edge community edition. License lasts a few years.
Bit of a learning curve and might be picky about graphics hardware, but powerful.
>>
I recommend OpenSCAD for anything parametric.
>>
>>1021900
As much as it is a technical non-arty task, id still like to know more about and sicuss best prwctices when it comes to making more fanciful models meant to be 3d printed.
Zbrush looks like it has a bunch of built in tools for it but ive never messed with them.
>>
>>1021954
Zbrush tools for 3D printing? Nah man, it just sculpts



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.