How is bombing cities, churches, and fleeing civilians not a war crime?By your logic, 9/11 is not a war crime, either
>>288513551It's not a war crime by virtue of the fact that war crimes didn't exist yet.Our present international legal definiton of warcrimes is based on the acts committed during WWII which Tanya is very much still in the middle of.
>>288513589And later wars. Weather manipulation wasn't a war crime until after Vietnam. But some stuff was already established after WW1.
It's only a war crime if there is no strategic goal. As soon as war is declared civilians in valid military targets are fair game.
>>288513589hague and the first geneva conventionyou mean there was no specific legal framework for the treatment of civilians in particular (though the 'mos maiorum' was around)
>>288513911>>288513589and more importantly, there's no CANADA in there
>>288513589it's still unethical and gay
It's only a war crime if you lose.
>>288514268This. Allied soldiers killed African and Muslim non-combatants and nobody talks about it.
The moment those civilians began shooting captured troops in the back. They became enemy combatants.
>>288514254Yeah of course but NOT legally actionable
>>288513551geneva conventions weren't held yet
Only winners get to hold warcrime tribunals, and the people subjected to these are usually the losers. Winners rarely put their war heroes on trial. Though it has happened, occasionally, when the government is threatened by their popularity or they need a scapegoat. But that's all beside the point, because Tanya is still too useful to her government to face justice for any atrocities she allegedly committed.
>>288514268/THREAD
>>288513551>By your logic, 9/11 is not a war crime, eitherDamaging jewish property is always a war crime, even if it has been greatly over-insured for the specific thing that happened to it right after by total coincidence.
>>288514268/a/ is not ready for this conversation yet, anon.
>bombing>cities (full of enemies)>churches (full of enemies)>fleeing civilians (considerable quantity of enemy militia men among them)>9/11 (state sanctioned to pass certain laws) is not a war crime either
>>288514839oaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoaoa
>>288513551>By your logic, 9/11 is not a war crime, eitherwho said it was? its always been considered a terrorist attack
>>2885135519/11 happened to America and therefore a crimethose other "crimes" happened in irrelevant places I couldn't point to on a map so not a crime
>>288513551didn't watch, but before precision weaponry you could aim your bombs for a factory and completely miss ityou can't just ask the enemy not to bomb your factories; if they missed and hit your house then that's just how it was. also serves as plausible deniability if they were intentionally targeting civilians i suppose
>>288515266The people who live next to the factories are the ones who work in the factories making the weapons.
>>288514327>African and Muslim non-combatants There is no such thing as an African or Muslim non-combatant.
If I placed a mother and a child into all of my military squads, would that make it a war crime to attack them?
>>288515689>Collateral damage for me but not for thee!
>>288515689only if they're noncombatants, like medicssoldiers still target medics for obvious reasons if the fighting gets bad enough but they might be less likely to kill the mother so they can rape her later
>>288513551>9/11 is not a war crime, eitherObviously it's not a fucking war crime. It was an act of terrorism. War crimes are necessarily committed during war, you fucking mongoloid. Crippling stupidity aside, the reason the things you listed aren't war crimes in-universe is because they haven't yet been agreed to be. That's an incredibly simple concept. Just because they're war crimes in our reality, doesn't mean they are in that one.
>>288515689noncombatants stop being noncombatants when they participate in combat or direct support of combat actions. medical personal are a specific category that have to abide by a defined set of limitations to retain protected status as well.
>>2885135519/11? Children in tunnels? What are we even talking about here?
>>288513551>By your logic, 9/11 is not a war crime, eitherYes?
>>288515264trvke
>>2885135519/11 was not only an inside job, it was insurance fraud.
>>288514327>guy who lives in the imperial core, exposed to only government approved journalism: boy the empire sure is popular
So is everyone looking forward to the second season of it? I hadn't heard about it at all until recently, but was thinking of checking out the first season since everyone tells me it's just about exterminating communists. I'm not really that big on isekai though, so I dunno. Is it actually animated well? Good story? Would I like the other characters?
>>288518527I watched it up until the snownigger tanked getting impaled by a rifle and drifting around the ocean in sub zero temps for hours, only to come back with a magic 12 gage and a power up from being x.
>>288513551It's not a crime the first time.
>>288513551war crimes are just pretext for murdering a defeated nations leadership and best soldiers, they're not actually a real thing
>>288518660>best soldierswar crimes are often committed by sore winners>Immediately they began to receive artillery, mortar, and sniper fire. The sniper fire was especially deadly. From a concealed position in a nearby draw, the snipers targeted wounded American soldiers as well as the medics attempting to aid them.>Compton asked Blanks if he was sure that they were the same snipers that had been shooting at them all day. When Blanks answered in the affirmative, Compton said bluntly, "Get them shot." Without hesitation, Blanks ordered Hair to assemble a firing squad and shoot the prisoners.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscari_massacre
>>288513551What are you on about?She's Tanya the EVIL, doing warcrimes is just another tuesday for her.
>>288518814That's not a war crime, that's reprisal. If you let snipers target your medics, and don't execute the snipers, you just invite more barbarism. Reprisal is fully justified, and was legal under the 1940 American Rules of Land Warfare. Warfare is only relatively civil when both sides understand that violating norms will result in reprisal. Frankly, it should happen more often.Compton was acquitted, if you didn't read that far.
>>2885135519/11 was state sponsored terror perpetrated by the jews who run the west retard. no foreign country had anything to do with it. no i don't count israel as forign its just part of jewmerica.
>>288513589what does it matter if in the year of our lord 2026 there are still country that are blatantly committing all that and more and get no real repercussions for it? Tanya did what she had to do in actual war. And she held back quite a bit.
>>288513551How is destroying you own property a war crime?? Silversteen committed some minor insurance fraud at worst
>>288513551>By your logic, 9/11 is not a war crimeInside jobs can't be war crimes
>>288515465Good goy
>>288515465They also firebombed entire towns of actual humans, little children burned to death.
>>288513551after the war they make the shit she did war crimes. she never got tried for any of it since america was more interested in operation paper clipping her.
>>288513551only getting 1 cour and a movie for at least 3 seasons worth of source material is the real war crime
>>288513551>/11 is not a war crimeIs it even a war crime when the government attacks itself?
>>288514327i often think of what the japs would have said about our japanese internment camps had they won the war. we'd have definitely blown if off like the japs do korean claims of comfort women. but they'd definitely be pissed and probably claim we holocausted them and shit.
>>288520174In what universe could they have ever come close to winning? They were losing right from the moment they attacked Pearl Harbor. If they blew up the big fuel tanks they would have at least slowed the US Navy a little, but they didn't even do that. Every ship they sank was obsolete and in the process of being replaced. The US built 112 fucking aircraft carriers during the war. But what really mattered was the US submarines sinking all of Japan's merchant ships, and the Japanese islands were not self-sufficient.
>>288520528it doesn't matter the universe, only the thought of how they'd have reacted to it had they won.
>>288513551Every country is committing them, remember the empire didn't start the war and was fighting a defensive war until they had big success and then chose to play for real. The french were mass executing prisoners, using them as human shields and the british cover it all up for them. Just wait till the next season as it goes deep into it, the rusy federation war crimes put the empire to shame
>>288518573He dies at the fiord in the manga, a British archmage (father of Mary Sues tard wrangler) ambushes Tanya's unit instead of the 12 gauge, god powered snownigger. Don't know which is true to the LN.
Is OP kill? He hasn't responded to a single one of these responses.
