This is the objectively correct anime ranking distribution that you should have. If yours is too top-leaning, you're a newfag; watch moar. If yours is too bottom-leaning, you're a contrarian; stop being a pretentious elitist.
>scoring anything>>>/r/eddit
There should be way more 1s and 2s, like anything with the harem, isekai, comedy, or cgdct tags, anything in the shounen demographic shouldn't be bigger than a 5, so your distribution is still way off.
>>290245158>he hasn’t learned to detect slop by premise alone, thus avoiding low scoresThe newfag is (You). Watch moar.
>>290245158>Objectively correct Stop right there! Your statement is on a matter of subjective opinion and cannot be labeled as such you presented
>>290245326I usually avoid watching shows I already know will be bad, hence the uneven distribution. If I bothered giving those anime a try, it would look more even>>290245202I'm loathe to use MAL, but trust me, it's more visually pleasing than my spreadsheet autism
>>290245326Only the dumbest of retards would ever actually pick up 1s and 2s.
>>290245158Unless it's your job to watch things. Anyone should have a slight bias towards higher scores because you should be selecting for things that seem interesting to you.
>>290245404A true spreadsheet autist would make his own graphs using an actual spreadsheet program. Also MAL especially sucks for even rating anime since it uses a retarded 1-10 point scale, which means the middlemost score is 5.5, which isn't even a score you can choose, whereas a 1-5 point scale has 3 as the middlemost score, which is nice and clean.
>>290245523You don't belong here, go back.
>spreadsheet It was oldfag 4cucked tier
>people unironically watch shit shows and crap they know they won't enjoy so they can feel good about "muh averages" and "muh score distribution"congrats on wasting your time?>inb4 "you'll run into lots of bad shows if you actually watch a lot"1. once again, congrats?2. not even a real problem unless you're at like 2000+ watched shows, and distributionfags like OP are always, and I mean ALWAYS, nowhere close to that
>>290245158I don't score shows based on what I though of that show in a vacuum. Rather, I score shows based on what I believe their universal ranking should be.ExampleMushoku Tensei gets a 10 even if I personal think it's an 8.Gintama gets a 1 even if I personally think it gets a 6 or 7.Let the butt hurt commence.
>>290245158No, this is the correct one. Ranking is for faggots.
>>290245158Depends on whether you count in dropped series. Because if not you are like normalfags that watch everything they started even if they don't like it. I won't follow anything that started with what I would rate with a 5/10 if I rated it.
I either give something a ten or don't rate it at all. I have yet to give anything a ten.
Depends what the numbers represent.If they represent animes then it should be a uniform distribution. A 5 out of 10 anime is better than ~45% of animes and worse than ~45%. A 10/10 has half a chance of being the best anime in a room of 10 animes.
There is no difference between good shows and bad shows.
>>290245819How dead inside do you have to be to not consider anything a masterpiece?
This board is shit>durr hurr then don't postevery other imageboard is dead
>Not even 500 showsEndless summer
>>290245682>not even a real problem unless you're at like 2000+ watched showsI am, but I'm not OP. I also used to be a completionist, so I have far fewer dropped shows than I should, it was retarded from my part
>>290245819>20 years later and he still hasn't watched TTGL
>>290245202ThisI only use it to track what I've watchedRanking stuff is for the top-leaning newfag bottom-leaning contrarian pretentious elitist newfag blah blah blah
>>290246014I have a couple of shows that i think are worthy but the more you read books and find other stuff the more you realize anime is a more limited medium than movies which are more limited by books. You can spend lifetime dedicated to quality books and not in other mediums
>>290246014I'm not that anon but for me feel like it's almost like physically impossible to enjoy something 100% of the time. Like there will literally always be something about a show or book or whatever that I dislike/don't enjoy/wish was done differently, and so an actual 10/10 for an entire work and not just an individual scene/moment feels impossible for meAt the same time I also wouldn't be able to give something a 1/10 or 0/10 or whatever would count as the lowest rating, because unless it's like a literal black screen or something, there probably will be something I thought was interesting about it or at least didn't mind. Even if I hated something 0/10 still feels kind of like a dumb baby rating because it feels way too emotional.But I don't rate stuff at all for this reason because I get that my autistic standards for rating don't align with everyone else's, and also I don't consider it fun or interesting anyway
>>290246669>ban evasion
Holy melty kek
>>290246606I've thought about this intermittently for like fifteen years even as a kid. Admitedly not for long because there wasnt a good answer to my instinct but my answer is I think anime is inherently a bit watered down, an abstract of lower form than reality and cannot therefore reach the represent material reality which obeying the laws of which is only what allows us to potentially reach something higher. A belief in anime above reality as art seems delusional. At least one can have faith in possibilities of being real things like gods, even paganism, mysticism. We know for a fact anime is fake
>>290245202fpbp/thread
No one gives a fuck about this except MALtards.
>>2902453261 &2s are rare.Like absolutely unwatchable levels Even berserk 2016/17 weren't 1/10s>>290245400Never turn on that trip fag shit ever again.
>>290245202This. Rating is for fags.
>>290246827How do you feel about this dying imageboard being mostly mexican-americans and geriatrics with alzheimers
>>290245158What is this?
>>290245462alternatively you can grow to dislike things youve watched in the past
I keep track of all the anime I've watched in a basic text file like a real man.
>>290245158>having a MAL cancer account in the first place
>>290247317Based I do this as well, but also with start/end dates
>>290246576That's not comparing apples to apples, thoughLike ignoring anime and just looking at books, there are masterpiece literature novels and there are masterpiece genre fiction books, of various genres. I think it's insane to say the former obviates any of the latter, because you should judge them largely based on different criteria. Not only are they meant to accomplish different things, they also have their own strengths and weaknesses. Same with anime vs anything else
What's even the point of keeping track of the anime you've watched if you can't even organize it by release date, studio, episode count, setting, or alphabetically? Also what's even the point of trying to rate shows you've watched numerically? It's not like you're going to forget whether you've enjoyed that show or not, it just seems so pointless.
>>290247317I just write a short blog-ish post about everything I finish in a text file.
>>290248369>Tracks each separate season of its show as its own entryI consider this padding, and I won't engage in it.
>>290248488Cry more, underage faggot.
>>290248369>What's even the point of keeping track of the anime you've watchedI don't even do this. If it was good I will remember it
>>290245202Thread ended here.
>>290248592The problem with not separating them is that then I won't know which part/season aired when, and some shows also change studio, which I would lose track of with only one entry. Also why would padding matter? It's not like anyone cares about how many Anime others have watched, no one would be that silly.>>290248632>If it was good I will remember itTrue, but It's nice to be able to look at the data of the Anime I've watched, like which studios have produced the most Anime I like, or which seasons had the most Anime I've watched, and other stuff like that. It's something that only Organization/Data autists would really understand.
>>290248788>It's something that only Organization/Data autists would really understand.I am one but I just don't see the point for it in anime. Just saving shows to my harddrive that I liked is enough. I can remember names and plots if I liked them enough
>>290248788>Also why would padding matter? It's not like anyone cares about how many Anime others have watched, no one would be that silly.Haha, yea, that would be stupid and lame and gay...
>>290245158My ratings are higher because I only watch good anime and skip bad anime. Simple as.
>>290245158Rating anime at all is for fags
>>290248827The act of Organizing the data itself is the most enjoyable part though, having access to all the now sortable data of the Anime I've watched is just a nice side bonus. >>290248898It's ok anon, I forgive you
>>290249283>The act of Organizing the data itself is the most enjoyable part thoughI get it, that's how I am with organizing my drives and backing stuff up. I just don't see the point for lists like that because I won't share them with people and I will remember notable things on my own. Also because I like the feeling of rediscovering something
>>290245158I prefer watching shows I actually enjoy instead. I also don't bother adding shows I dropped.
>>290249377Because my ultimate goal for sorting things is to have tags connected to the data so that I can sort the data in multiple ways. For example, if I wanted to see which shows I've watched made by Trigger I can do that, or If I want to see which anime I watched in a specific season I can do that. Basically it's the same approach that Boorus have, where each artwork has various tags tied to them to make them more searchable. Obviously it has no real practical purpose, but it massively appeals to my autism.
People don't seem to have taken statistics. A curve like that will only happen if you're watching anime completely blind, which nobody with a brain does. The majority of people are only going to watch things they think look interesting and that seem like something they'd like, which is weighting the curve to the top.
>>290245326how do you pick something that bad, and still watch it past 3 episodes?
>>290245158Wrong
>>290250399>rates on a 9 point scale
>>290245158I just drop bad series unless they're some degree of morbidly fascinating so I rarely finish something I wouldn't rate at least a 5.
>>290250746Never seen a perfect anime, there's always something you can nitpick
>>29025083310 isn't perfect, it is "as close to perfect as you can get for the genre"
>>290251548>10/10 isn't perfect What the hell are you even talking about, if you score a 100/100 on a test it wasn't a perfect score?
>>290251882The difference is that entertainment has a great deal of subjectivity involved. It's not a test where there is always a single correct answer
>>290248369I actually like this. I will copy you>>290250833I agree that nothing will ever be perfect (fallen nature, etc.), so a 10/10 should be your favorite(s) show. You really don't have any shows that you enjoyed from the bottom of your heart?
>>290245158
>>290252852Uh what happened to the 400 other shows that you're supposed to have watched?
Let's be honest anime is basically for complete and total secondaries to begin withIf you care about quality, you don't even really watch it anymore.
>>290253156I'm sub200 titles.And I already stopped caring about anime.
Troubling that the only post so far that has 500+ is also a dullard that doesn't understand what 10/10 means.
>>290245158If your taste resembles a normal distribution instead of a pareto distribution, you're a fucking retarded nigger
>>290245158>watch show>enjoy show>rate it 10 to help out its global rankingIt's that shrimple.
>>290245158I don't watch things I don't like, bad ratings are only for things that looked good at first but later disappointed me
you can just not watch bad shows
>>290247317I did that too when I was a filthy newfag. 398 anime titles watched? lmao embarrassing
>>290249586U haven't watched shit
>>290245158Do you pick shows to watch at random? Dumbass.
>>290245158I'm not autistic so I don't really care.
>>290257843What's wrong with that? Go into a new series with a blank slate instead of wrong expectations. Especially when you watch anime seasonally and just give everything a chance.
>>290245158If you even make it through the first 3 episodes, it should obviously be in the top 50% otherwise why are you wasting your finite lifespan watching something you don't enjoy.
>>290245158I only watch shows that are almost certainly at least a 7/10. Sometimes I'm disappointed and it scores lower and I'll rate those honestly. Sometimes I start watching a show I think will be a 7/10 and it's actually much better.I'll let the retards watching 40 shows every season give their scores to the shows that are merely average and below but watching anime isn't my entire life and I prefer to occupy my precious free time with good entertainment only.
10 means perfection, and nothing is perfect, much less anime, besides, most of them are garbage. The correct score would be everything between 1 and 4, with a few in 5 and 6. With luck, a couple will reach 7, but it's better to watch movies or read books if you want a higher quality standard.
>>290253826this, anime is generally trash. except kon movies and 3-4 classics the rest is not worth your time, stop ranking shit
>>290258772>and nothing is perfectretardA 10 is a rounded up 9.5>b-b-b-butfuck you
>>290258800Manga is an inferior medium to anime tbqh.
I've never given a 2 or 3 score. Even something as dogshit as Gal Cleaning deserves a 6 because it's entertaining and has decent art
>>290258826There's no 9.5 in anime either; nothing's that good. >>290258847Yep, manga is worse than anime, at least the latter can do something with the visuals and has better stories.
>>290258984>There's no 9.5 in anime either; nothing's that good.That's a (You) problem. Start watching some actual good shit
>>290247130Then it curls back around and you start liking it again.
>>290258993Like? I've already seen all the anime worth watching. The problem is that the medium doesn't offer anything that good, that's all. It's called having standards. It's okay to admit that you like mediocre content.
If you've watched more than 140 anime or so, you've basically watched more than 2 anime per year and you're just consuming lots of slop. There's only been a handful of years in all of history that had more than 2 good anime in it. A lot of years there was 0 good anime. You shouldn't watch more anime until you've watched every 10/10 since 1958, and then only then should you start on the 9/10 anime if you actually are that desperate for more. If you watch a single 5/10 anime and you haven't watched at least 10,000 other anime before it, you're missing out on thousands of better shows and movies you could have watched instead. Like, what the fuck are you even thinking? Do you value your time so little?
>>290259172I like watching bad shows and movies, I loved jjk
>>290245158I don't believe perfection exists. My single 10/10 is a statement more than the deserved score which is more like a 9.5/10.
>>29025924710/10 doesn't mean perfection, retard. You've misunderstood the assignment.
>>290259293It means perfection or the best possible score, and technically it can always be improved, so a 10/10 cannot exist; retard.
>>290259150>he hates chinese cartoons but still keeps watching themgrim
>>290245158I do a lot of vetting before I watch/read something so I don't waste time watching stuff I know I won't like.
>>290259323The best possible score is not perfection, nor is it reserved for the #1 best. You've misunderstood the assignment. It's a category for the best x number of things, where x is some reasonable value. Whatever you're rating as 9/10 is your actual 10/10s because you're just rating out of 9 because you don't understand what a rating is.
>want to give it a 8/10>average score is 6/10 >give it a 10/10 to pump the average Shrimple as
>>290259334I never said I dislike consuming garbage; I like to turn my brain off, and the bright colors entertain me. Nobody goes to see a Marvel movie expecting something good; they just want to switch off.>>290259415>perfection or the best possible scoreHowever you look at it, if I say that 10 doesn't exist and 9.9 is my maximum then it's 9.9/10 and I know that 10 is a category that I will never be able to fill.
>so many faggots with barely a few hundred watched anime titlesNo wonder board quality is so terrible.
>>290259481Then you're just rating out of 9, which is retarded because the scale is out of 10.
>>290259481>I like to turn my brain off, and the bright colors entertain me. Nobody goes to see a Marvel movie expecting something good; they just want to switch off.Yeah you fucking hate chinese cartoons. Just go do some drugs instead
>>290259503I'm simply saying that nothing exists that's good enough to be at the top of the list; besides, there's always room for improvement, so I doubt there's a 9/10 either.>>290259535Nah, I already tried it and I prefer watching animu. Perfect blue is great, for example
>>290245202FPBP! /thread
>>290259172Those scores aren't real and quality is subjective.
>>290259686Then you're just rating out of 8, which is retarded because the scale is out of 10.
>>290245326>like anything with the haremI've found harems to honestly be underrated. People's impressions of 'harems' seem to be dragged down by shitty "will they or won't they" focused romcoms that just frustratingly drag out everything and tease progress that never happens, which are mostly awful, but harems are properly unpretentious and focused on making episodes and moment to moment character interactions interesting, without pretending to actually be about who the MC ends up with. Love Hina and 100 Kanojo etc. are genuinely solid and how ridiculous their premises are is irrelevant.>isekaiSAO is unironically the best of these, despite how much people protest this, so I'll accept that you're right.>comedyYep, Japan is shockingly bad at humor, even granting that a lot of their comedy is much more subtle than people can often articulate. The best example I have to sum this up is this moment in Maison Ikkoku where the MC is reading this except on a test he's taking, which describes how odd American GIs found it that Japs never seem to laugh at anything, even when the Americans were howling at something. I found just reading that being explicitly pointed out made me laugh harder than almost any actual joke in any anime.>cgdctThis stuff is genuinely terrible and people who like it tend to be very emotionally immature. They're often at a point where they feel they're "grown out of just watching action shows", but incapable of evaluating emotional depth or good character writing enough to see that something like the mahou shoujo genre does more or less everything these shows do better.
>>290246871anon you sound mega retarded
>>290260728People who are actually mature don't hate things because they think they'll be seen as immature for liking them.
To be fair, you do need to have a pretty high IQ to properly identify an anime as a 10/10 work
>>290260728>SAO is unironically the best of these>cgdct>This stuff is genuinely terrible and people who like it tend to be very emotionally immature.Jesus this board really is filled with nothing but subhuman normalfag shonen spics/seamonkeys lmao. Good bait, actually got me mad there for a second
I only watch anime that I know I will enjoy and all the anime I enjoy are automatically 10/10. Also if you can't already tell that you will enjoy a show before watching it then you might genuinely have some form of development disorder.
>watch anime for years and years>still hashing out what’s “good” and “bad” Do you have any actual interest in the medium? You should know by now what directors, writers, authors, animators, studios, publishers, etc you enjoy and have something to say about it other than>uhhhh I watched 1000 anime
>>290261079NTA but he's right about cgdct. The fans of this plotless garbage are in the bin with shounenfags. This genre is the anime equivalent of fags and women who go on YouTube and search up cat video compilations.
>>290261458Imagine not being entertained looking at girls.
>>290261079>SAOI fail to have heard of a good reason why any single other MMO isekai is better. The whole genre is trash and SAO is just the least trashy and most original and grounded of the lot, despite people performatively acting otherwise to gatekeep newfags or for the sake of hipsterism. Most people saying otherwise talk like they've never actually seen it and just repeat crap false other people have said about it.Likewise, I absolutely love Slice of Life when it is executed well, but CGDCT/moeshit shows where the characters are practically just dolls are the lowest form of this and just drag down the whole idea of it.
>>290261552>CGDCT/moeshit shows where the characters are practically just dolls are the lowest form of this and just drag down the whole idea of it.So true fellow xister. All those creepy misogynistic p*edo jap animes are giving me an ickI looove Kirito tho he's ao dreamy
>>290261539There's girls in other series, with actual plot lines. Good job on minimizing it though.
>>290261458>I don't like cute girlsOkay, fag. Didn't ask.
>>290261800See>>290261748
>>290261827Sorry but watching anime and not liking cgdct is either a sign of low iq or being gay.
>>290261933I'm sure you can cite non antidotal sources. I'll wait.
>>290245158I only watch stuff I'd probably like in the first placeIf your score distribution is like that then you're probably watching everything each season>>290259247For me, a 10/10 is a 9+/10 that changed my life i.e. I began keeping a diary after efI only have two 10/10s
>>290261748There's plot in CGDCT too. They're just mostly episodic plots instead of heavily serialized, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
>>290261972You have to go back, faggot.
>>290263849I've been here longer than you've been alive. You can stop trying to fit in, you look pathetic. >>290263822If it's episodic then it's not a plot, there's no plot progression happening, or overarching story in most of them leaving them feel like a hollow experience with no pay off. Anything that happens is just magically gone the next episode outside of maybe new characters.
>>290264171You haven't even had internet in your country as long as this site's been around, and you definitely aren't fitting in if you don't like CGDCT.
>>290259150If you are posting K-On that is a huge indicator of the shit you normally watch.No wonder you can't find anything "that good"
>>290262574How did you rate BnP?
>>290264612>in your country You mean America? Where I live in tje west coast, where Internet was invented like 70 years ago? Yea you really showed me.
>>290257889Just unlikely anyone does it because it's a waste of time if half the shows you pick up are garbage. OPs ratings chart looks like a normal distribution, which would likely only arise if they picked shows to watch at random, which they probably don't.
>>290264171Episodic means the plot is mostly contained to one episode, not an absence of plot, with the characters evolving over time through their experiences without needing to constantly reference prior events. As opposed to the battle shonen you watch where multiple episodes pass with nothing at all except people screaming at each other with energy beams going on, and plot is only detectable over hundreds of episodes.
>>290264738Sure thing, Al Gore.
>>290264171You sound ESL.>>290264654True it's hard to find shows better than K-On.
>>290264916I'll bite then, give me 3 CGDCT that have an actual overarching plot that isn't just >Episodic thing>We moved up a year in school>repeat until graduation Because that's all that ever happens. My frame of reference is my binge days from around 2007 to 2014 where I watched basically every seasonal daily on release. If the genre has somehow evolved and I'm unaware I'm willing to discuss >ShounenSuffers from no plot just as bad but is actively trying to have one at least. They're all garbage, with the same level of writing as CGDCT but people pretend there's some massive gap between the 2 genres.>inb4 demogwaficKys
>>290264877I've been doing it for 19 years now. Always keep an open mind and you're up for surprises. How much is your time worth that you can't watch a handful of episodes of everything? Better to drop something after you informed yourself than never watching them to begin with. You can never tell if things don't turn out to your liking.
>>290245158I drop way too much slop to log it all but basically yeah
>>290250833>being able to nitpick means it's not 10/10That's silly. These ratings are not rocket science. Being a 10/10 doesn't mean it is flawless. It just means you enjoyed it more than almost everything else.
>>290264654K-on is the only good anime next to totoro and evangelion, I'm sorry hipster
>>290265058You still don't seem to understand what plot even means.
>>290265572>>290265017(You)I don't know what people see in K-On. Let it go you balding niggers, there were much better shows before and after it
*mogs you*
>>290267652It was pretty great though. And an excellent plot.
>>290267859I and every person I have ever tried watching it with or talking about it with has ended up dropping it. And it isn't due to "ew too old" because I've seen way older stuff, and it isn't from a pathological hatred of SoL either, because I enjoy some series that are about that. Maybe I and everyone I know just hate band shows, but I fail to see what it does special at all.
>>290245158Anime is bimodal.
>>290267952The fact you'd even bring up the age, which isn't that old, makes me think you're still a kid. What do you consider "way older stuff"? Stuff from the 90s?Anyway, as a kid, you probably just weren't paying enough attention. I understand that's a common problem. If you keep your eyes on the screen while it's playing you pick up on a lot of subtleties right in that first episode that tell you it's something special, before they even have a band. Can you even articulate why Mugi joined the club, and what the exact moment was where she decided? What do you have to say about the lighting?
>>290268082What do you consider old? K-on is almost 20 years old at this point. Any anime that was airing when I was in high school feels old to me considering I'm in my 30s now.
>>290268082Brother 1996 was 30 years ago.
>>290268082>What do you consider "way older stuff"? Stuff from the 90s?80's and 70's.>you probably just weren't paying enough attentionI was, but the drama wasn't interesting, the jokes weren't funny, and I didn't think the characters were interesting either. So I didn't finish it.I won't dignify the rest of your comment, but all I can say is that it is only balding, senile people who still cling to that show as being amazing. Same as those /a/ oldfags who claim Toradora is the best love story ever too. Move the fuck on and watch more stuff. Again, better stuff was made both before and after it. It is sad to have a vapid show about airheaded girls as your number one of all time.
Is this acceptable?
>>290268188You have to be 18 to post on this site. K-On is just slightly older than 17 years. If you think K-On is old, I think you're probably not old enough to be on this site.
>>290269068Did you even read my post you fucking retard. Are you illiterate? Brown? Both? This is the only website where no matter what you say, including your age that double faggotniggers will go>UHHH!!! ACKSHUALLY YOU'RE NOT OLD ENOUGH TO BE HEREChrist some of you are insufferable, answer the question or fuck off back to where ever you seeped in here from.
>>290269239Your response tells me you're ESL. There's no other explanation for you misunderstanding that hard.
>>290269328>You're ESL for misunderstanding my post>Uhh ignore the fact that I clearly didn't understand yoursGenuinely braindead. You're too retarded to even understand why your original reply was not only moronic but irrelevant to my question as a whole. You couldn't even answer a simple question, probably because your translator app fucked up the message some how.
>>290245202Weird way to admit you never scored
>mal thread>+100 replies
>>290269487I did answer your question. I just didn't give you the answer you wanted. I'm calling you ESL because you don't know what a generic you is, and still didn't understand it after getting a pretty strong hint you parsed it wrong. So now I'm quite convinced. You basically have to be white to like K-On anyway so I'm not that surprised.
>>290270027>What do you consider old>YOU HAVE TO BE 18 TO POST HERE>Are you illiterate?>YOU'RE ESL>You didn't answer my question>UHH IT WASN'T THE ANSWER YOU WANTED SAAR DO NOT MAKE FUN OF THE K ON You're not human, I refuse to believe you're anything other than a bot.
>>290245158it's retarded to use a number to describe how good or bad an anime is, witch is fitting for OP
>>290270074I even used the generic you again to tease you and you still don't know what that is or how to understand what I'm saying when I use it. These aren't difficult sentences for a native speaker to parse, but you keep struggling. It makes it very obvious.
>>290270230Truly only a naive English speaker could see my question and answer it with something entirely irrelevant. My age range was even listed on the post but your attention span is probably too fried to read that long, like everyone else your age.
>>290270362>naive English speakerStill don't know what a generic you is, huh? You could have looked it up by now and stopped exposing yourself.
>>290270592It quite literally has nothing to do with my original question, which you're clearly incapable of answering or embarrassed that you replied originally with something entirely irrelevant that was already extrapolated in my post to begin with. Are you an idiot or just stuck with really bad NPD?
>>290245158>5 is neutral/indifferent>Anything above that is things I like>Anything below that is things I dislikeI have positive feelings on most manga I read
>>290245345this, obviously i'm not going to waste time watching or grading shit
>>290270704It has everything to do with your inability to understand my answer. But you seem to have gotten very angry over it and that's been known to further lower IQ from what I can only guess wasn't too high to begin with, but that isn't something I can help you with, nor do I really care. I'm sure most other people understood me just fine. Perhaps if you get a good night sleep and calm down you can come back and read my post with fresh eyes in the morning. It's already quite late where you are, I'm sure.
>>290270942Ok, so we're just going to go with NPD. Clearly your mother over praised you as a child for understanding the most basic English concepts which is why you tout it so heavily, but here in reality everyone thinks you're a retard who can't answer a basic question. It's 3pm here, where white people live, you wouldn't know that though since your basement probably doesn't have windows.
>>290271019You forgot that the time zone you're in is off 30 minutes from most of the rest of the world's timezones. If you want to pretend to be an American, say 3:30 PM. If you want to pretend to be a white American, say 2:30, 4:30, 5:30, or 6:30 PM.
>>290271173Sorry I forgot that the idea of rounding was beyond the understanding of your first grade mastery of the English language. When talking about time zones any normal person understands that there's no half and only the hour matters in 90% of countries. Maybe you being born in a non-white country is why you're so focused on the idea of a half time zone? That must be it, we've solved the mystery.
