Why was her outfit censored back then?
Because you touch yourself at night.
>>291607504because the viewers were kids back thennow they're adultsbleach is not for zoomers
>>291607588That doesn't make sense at all, the anime is an adaptation of a manga which doesn't have an age rating, was published in a magazine for boys, there's also more current IP material in the same old demographic
Holy shit, comparing the latest manga chapters with the adaptation in relation to the old ones (2004-2012) the difference is brutal.Before, they censored even cleavage and breast size, I never thought this pic rel fight would even be animated.The harm that north american television companies have done to the anime industry is now clearly evident. Funny how all the japanese entertainment misfortunes are linked to these yankees.
>>291607818are you new?shounen manga always have more gore and have less censorship than the anime
>>291607945But what does that have to do with the inconsistency I pointed out? Furthermore, it does not complement anything to the previously quoted post.
>>291608051I clearly said the viewers, not the readers
>>291607504Because it's a different time, unc
>>291607818>>291608051oh I wait, I misunderstood the intent of your post>it doesn't make any sense at allyou have to ask the japs why they censor anime and not the manga
>>291608070The anime aired on the same programming schedule on TV Tokyo along with other shows like Naruto and Pokémon.
>>291608154>Narutoalso has more censorships than the manga
>>291608146>>291608282>why they censor anime and not the mangaThat's not what I was pointing out either, it was about the same outfit being censored before compared to the later ANIMATION, I only mentioned the manga i.e in the first quote to state that the work has always had the same demographic.
>>291608340the anime industry changed? isn't it obviouseven the animations nowadays are so different than it was in 2010
>>291607504Stricter content moderation guidelines back then.
