Thread for AI generated videos.Thread Rules:>No low effort or low quality gens>No glitchy gens>No spammingsee>>>/g/ldg for guides and technical support>Low end cards: https://rentry.org/AnimAnon-AnimDiff>High end cards: https://rentry.org/wan21kjguidehttps://rentry.org/wan22ldgguideUse https://ezgif.com/mute-video to quickly mute your grok gens.Previous thread: >>9044229
Who’s up for some after school sessions
Could somebody animate this?
>>9061663This isn't request faggot
>>9061696can you stop spamming this in every thread?
>>9061854Could you animate it yourself?
>>9062027yes, but I'm not requesting it
>grok refuses to animate thisFUCKING WHY
>PC not strong enough for local gen>Grok doesn't allow me to upload the image for some reason>Tensor went full SFWI really hate to resort to requesting, but can someone please make a video of this image where Linda's bra fall down, making her cover herself while smiling in embarrassment?
tensor's SFW filter is actually pretty weak so I'm going to continue using it lol
Whats to use if Grok goes down a similar path to tensor?
>>9062637>if Grok goes down a similar path to tensorhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7MCVm4XIScI hope not
any good momson ones? or tips on grok prompts to generate such?
Requesting an animation for this pic.
https://files.catbox.moe/1l3iat.mp4She's not real but she's real homely
Just started watching the fallout TV show, did anyone else find this scene in the first episode kind of weird and unexplained?
>>9064369Nice and jiggly
>>9062272I tried a number of times with two different checkpoints, and couldn't really seem to get what you're going for here. Playing with breasts seems to be embedded a little too deeply into the more sex-aware checkpoints.
Trying out a bit of a gimmick here
You know what. This might just be worth all the environmental damage it's causing.
Anyone got any good big titty content?
'Good' is relative. As is 'big titty,' I suppose. This isn't the hyper-extreme variety, and it's of my current gimmick, but.
And on that topic, a classic scene from galaxy quest.There's a slight but definite discontinuity in the color when jumping over to the generated video, which is annoying and I'm having trouble fully identifying/fixing. It seems to be the case that even the first frame is very slightly altered in comparison to the "first frame" source image it's given; I'm hoping that applying a diminishing color correction to the first half-second's worth of frames is both achievable and will address the issue.
Even the 50s aren't safe.
Alternatively, for somewhat more conventional sexual content
>>9065077>>9065070>>9064960How are you making these? The last one is great. I'd like to try to do one fo these
>>9065203I'm using the free video editor VSDC along with WAN. Find an appropriate moment in the video where you want to jump over to edited content, and extract the frame from that moment; VSDC has a "create snapshot" tool (control-F12) which can then be exported, but I also half the time used VLC's similar "take snapshot" feature. I then use that snapshot as the starting frame to generate a normal six-second wan 2.2 video.Within VSDC, I snip down the original video to briefly before the relevant scene and ending right when the snapshot was taken. I can then drag the generated video file onto the timeline, and it sets it up to begin right where the other leaves off. Then I can export the project, making sure to disable audio in the export screen so I can upload it here.
It's only a part of the process, but if you want I could share the (somewhat ungainly) workflow that I use for it.Ah, Mamie van Doren...who apparently is still alive, huh.
>>9064588Damn if that doesn't look like Chiana from Farscape.>>9064523I think it's worth a few acres/gallons.
This one's more than a little fever-dreamy, just trying to stitch together more than one generation. Problem there is that of course context is lost every time.
>>9065409How is wan letting you do this, is there a software that lets you do this in general? The website isnt doing it
>>9065531The obscene part is locally generated, using comfyui, the "smooth mix" wan 2.2 i2v checkpoint, and for those in particular, a cum/facial I2V lora. And then of course it has to be stitched into the regular video separately as I described.
>>9065535Is there a way all of this is together so i don’t have to do any juggling to make these kinds of videos? The editing thing is the easy aspect but the later is hard
>>9065537No way I know of, although once you have a decent work flow set up the generation isn't that hard. (Though I am having a truly bizarre issue where sometimes smaller-resolution videos take an absurdly long time, and I have to make them larger to do it faster...)
>>9065540It looks like it can work well with live action stuff, can it work well with 2D stuff or even cg?
>>9065541>It looks like it can work well with live action stuff, can it work well with 2D stuff or even cg?Yeah, I think it's effectively more convincing with true video, but it can definitely give cartoony results as well. I made >>9064400 earlier, where it wasn't great mostly for failure to achieve the desired content. And then as mostly an experiment I did this with a sketch-style image, results were still adequate though you can see the 'desire' of the model to make things more realistic.
>>9065546Oh okay, i know some live action scenarios that can work better for this. Ill experiment with a few things later tonight
If there's one annoying flaw with the checkpoint I use by default, it's that jiggling has been baked into it to an absurd degree. It can be nigh-impossible to get bare breasts without them acting like they're trying to fly away. Case in point, this one came out quite bad in that regard.
>>9065553Can it do regular bouncing breasts?
>>9065556More or less, I guess, I don't know how convincing it is overall. Not usually my focus. There's loras specifically for that, too.
>>9065562There are some parts of movies that made me wish they would just flash out the boobs to bounce, too many to list, but this might be what ive been looking for
>>9065562>64 bit is requiredDamn it
>>9065562Is there one that can work with 32?
>>9065593>Is there one that can work with 32?I know little about the technical side of this, so don't put much stock in my answer here, but I am doubtful. Depends on having a video card with a lot of VRAM, too.
>>9065609I was gonna toy around with some CG films for giggles, but i cant do that since I dont have a 64
Its kinda dumb that Grok wont do anything lewd with screenshots from cartoons, lol.
>>9065640It doesn’t? I never used it
>>9065492>Mamie van Doren.I heard her recent appearance looks like a cougar, and that's a good thing.
>>9065694Well, I looked up a picture. The loss of beauty with age has always something of a tragedy to it, and especially for a whom whose beauty was her coin, I can understand her trying to hold on to it. The overall effect though I think is somewhat more disturbing than appealing.She was lovely in her prime, though.
>>9065743She was lovely
>>9065743>>9065492>>9065077This is the best possible use of Ai imaginable.
>>9065793Between you not quoting the goo-dropping one and the other guy specifically citing that the last, non-goo-dropping one is great, I'm beginning to suspect that other people's fancies are not so terribly tickled by that particular theme.Wanted to get a gradual colorization effect on this; this is the best I've gotten so far.
My most ambitious work yet in the field of pornogrifying old public-service films.
>>9065963Any chance we can get more like this?
>>906564399% of the time, it wont.I would try other AI generators but my ADHD brain cant handle all the shit that goes in it, lol.
>>9065963Heh, thats someone grandma.Would love to see something like Wizard of Oz edited clips too.Tit flashing would be great.
>>9066091It would be nice to see some things like Betty page or any other hot actress doing this sort of thing
>>9066103Indeed
>>9065925Not bad for color attempt
>>9066087The immediate handicap is that I need a local version of the original video I'd be pulling from, and apart from my mystery science theater 3000 collection (which is generally at a rather low resolution), I don't have really anything in the way of old movies around.
>>9066338>>9066103Or if you prefer things on the more direct side.
>>9064949is this grok? i can’t for the life of me get any sort of “cum” to get past their censor
>>9066366No, local generation.
Hardly perfect. I continue to have issues with the transitions between generated scenes, despite my best efforts; this seems to be more obvious when color is present because slight differences in shade can now be quite visible. And the appearance of the penis (both in the sense of what it looks like and how it comes onto the scene) aren't really what I had in mind, the models were uncooperative. Still, here's wizard of oz.(Also, if you look at the background, the scarecrow seems to manifests a gun of some kind.)
>>9066338This is nice, but I was hoping she would be willing to give someone a blowjob
>>9065492That’s fairly impressive. I wonder what that other girl was doing while they’re kissing.
>>9066338>>9066350There are a couple of videos of Bettie online if you know where to look. Bettie would be the type who'd flash her boobs or even get direct with a blowjob.>>9065492I wonder if the third girl is playing with herself while this is happening.>>9066405The secret cut that we couldn't get. Would've worked better if she was blowing two if the scarecrow wasn't holding a gun if local thought he literally was packing heat.
>>9066424Relatively easily achieved.
>>9066492Now this is hot, thanks
>>9066446>Would've worked better if she was blowing twoMister Wan innocently asks, this is what you wanted, right?
>>9066517Kinda works
>>9066517I weirdly was expecting all three to pull down their pants and she was blowing them separately at the same time.
>>9066517I just noticed she’s holding two fake ones
>>9066556>I just noticed she’s holding two fake onesHah, interesting. That was indeed the main absurdity that amused me enough to post it. Guess focusing on the central action can distract one from other oddities.Anyway, here's this too, since it still does something for me at least.
>>9066564Oz just busted his on Dorothy
>>9066564Can you do one where she’s making out with the Wicked Witch?
>>9066573>Can you do one where she’s making out with the Wicked Witch?Find me a clip of her with the wicked witch which seems to have a natural place to transition into it. My work there was just taken from a youtube trailer.
>>9066573You have to get a scene where Dorthey is with the wicked witch in the same scene.
>>9066405Hah, I appreciate the nudity.
>>9066492What everyone was thinking back in her heyday.
You know, the color grading in the latter harry potter movies is really crazy. Everything's terribly dark and blue-tinted, I had to do auto-leveling in photoshop on a screenshot to make a halfway reasonable start here.Wan needs a tentacle lora or something though, it was quite uncooperative and this is probably the best out of like 25+ generations.
>>9066912Now this is getting good
>>9066912School got more interesting
Bump
Did the threads in gif die out?I finally got myself a 5090 and getting back into sloppery... and looks like I've been rangebanned from posting files..
>>9067334Try posting them later
>>9067334What do you got to offer?
Requesting an animation of this pic.>Captcha: HHNNNG
Lewdly animating a few of my old midjourney generations.
Including some rather stylistic ones - I had no specific expectations for how this would turn out, but I think it's somewhat noteworthy.
>>9067739>>9067743>>9067755Pretty based desu
Grok is insane. It had be up late and early this morning. Getting my brain fried.
>>9067755Can we get more tittyjobs in this thread?
>>9067368>>9067541Testing
I notice the Wicked Witch's features become more and more normalized as the video goes on.
>>9068185I can see it, not bad>>9068320Weird how it transitions well, lesbian actions makes the witch hot and young again
>>9068320Now that’s really hot. Kinda wish it kept the Wicked Witch old, but still pretty good.
>>9068379Its a weird transition that works
>>9068439Yeah, it does work
>>9068320Can you do other old movies to make them a little more exciting like this?
>>9068470Maybe, inspire me with a clip from youtube.
>>9068494This is from the golden age, but can you make this a little more direct(fucking) or have her giving the guy a blowjob? It builds up to that but we dont see it https://youtu.be/SYEkujL_nrI?t=226
>>9068525I mean not from golden age.
>>9068525>old movies>Liar, Liarouch, my soul.I'll take a look.
>>9068532Cool
>>9068372I got distracted by some side quests and I still gotta figure out how to properly wan 2.2. These were from my old wan 2.1 workflow.
>>9068494https://youtu.be/_mHgGU4AbOA?si=CjZpZU1ofhH8an1L&t=41This is one from the ACTUAL golden age(40s if you're wondering) this could easily transition to the woman blowing the guy.
>>9068494You can pick ANY scene with this one, have a go with her stripping herself to the nude.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAAq2O9bjKM
>>9068548Getting a little better
>>9068607Turns out going higher res really is worth it. I accidentally went above the 2048x2048 maximum that this board allows after I upscaled so I had to downscale it a bit.
>>9068661Nice leather here
>>9068661Jesus, how long does it take you to generate at such huge resolutions?
>>9068671I wonder if it took as long as the person who did the oz stuff
>>9068494Keeping up with the Wizard of Oz, here’s one with Glinda and Dorothy. Could have them make out. https://youtu.be/YvQ7HiJkUJ4?si=MAKrE5NRUv0idRPk
>>9068684That would be nice
>>9068678Well, there's the full process of working on it and then there's the generations themselves. I kept the sizes reasonable (about six-minute generations) so that I could actually redo them and pick good results.Also, think I've made a breakthrough on the color mismatch problem - it makes no sense, but it looks like neither VLC snapshots nor VSDC editor snapshots actually completely match the colors of the video frame. I tried instead with a simple screenshot and it was almost perfect.
>>9068699That makes sense
In particular, if you want more than a single six-second addition, you need to try to get one that ends at a moment without a lot of motion, because otherwise the transition to the next clip will almost inevitably be very jarring.Currently discarding a lot of liar liar attempts for that reason.
>>9068707Figured that movment would make things messy and not in the nsfw way
>>9068707Noted that 90s movies dont work well for ai generated movies
>>9068712>Noted that 90s movies dont work well for ai generated moviesHm? That's certainly not what I meant to convey, if that's what you were taking from it. Picking a relatively stationary moment in the original movie isn't that hard. It's getting that first generated clip to end in another relatively stationary moment that can be a roll of the dice, which has no particular relationship to the era of the original movie.
Is weird that I always wanted a nsfw of older movies but when someone is doing content I can't think of any movie right now
>>9068715Okay i misread that. It just sounded a little bit more complicated than it needed to be
>>9068724Oh she’ll get make partner alright. This came out great
>>9068718Wikipedia is your friend
>>9068663It's meant to be latex. ZIT could do better but I thought that one was quite on point with the look.>>9068671It doesn't take that long on a 5090 and my setup isn't even optimized right now. I'm sure I could squeeze more speed out of this if I knew what I was doing. I think I'm offloading too much to RAM which is slowing it down.I timed some just for you. Wan2.2 81 frames at 720x1280 did >212.05sfrom an unloaded state and>172.76sfor the followup.
>>9068750Well, that's faster than mine I think (I normally measure by the seconds per iteration, to account for the fact that you can choose to increase/decrease step count), but I was more curious about the ones you're doing at above 2048. Or are those upscales?
>>9068751Oh yeah they're over 2048 after 2x upscale and I slapped an extra node in the workflow to downscale it to fit this board. I'm using>/ldg/anon's Wan2.2 lightx2v workflowfrom OP's link.
>>9068753Interesting, I always feel like my upscales are bit glitchy/wonky, but yours seem fine. Just a regular lanczos upscale, or is it something more sophisticated?
>>9067720
>>9068549
>>9068494https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Till_the_Clouds_Roll_By The whole movie is on wikipedia and it has alot of actresses including the wizard of oz main actress
>>9068757These were done with 2xNomosUni_esrgan_multijpg using Image Upscale with Model Batched node.I tried genning 2048x2048 and 1536x1536 straight in wan for science but got out of memory error'd. >>9068778Well done.
>>9068780>These were done with 2xNomosUni_esrgan_multijpg using Image Upscale with Model Batched node.Interesting, I'll have to give that a shot.
>>9068784Yeah, guess this isn't going to work for me - for some reason using it on my generations is unbelievably slow, like over 10 minutes I got only 2 batches of 16 frames upscaled. Assuming that was the "image upscale with model batched" node from comfyui-kjnodes.
>>9068804Lower the per batch. Mine is at 2. Or if that doesn't work you can try Upscale Image (Using Model) node.
>>9068805Aha. Either that was the problem or I had to restart the system for some reason.Results are...good, preliminarily? I'm largely concerned about the eyes, that was the area that got flickery and unreliable with regular upscaling, presumably because some chaotic effect in the process meant the slight differences from frame to frame didn't get upscaled in a way that looked consistent. Or course, this may not be the best test image - I told it to focus on the face, but there's not much detail in those eyes.
>>9068815As far as I understand these sort of upscalers are all still pretty dumb. They don't know what they're looking at they just upscale. Genning at higher res helps give it that detail that it can upscale. Then again if you gen at high res you don't necessarily need to upscale.There's also a lot of different upscalers and some probably work better for stylized and others for realism. This https://openmodeldb.info/ site has a bunch if you want to experiment.
>>9068778Beautiful transition
>>9068684Another significant expenditure of effort that I wouldn't particularly care for anyone I know to be aware of...
Was this ever continued?
>>9068555>>Her stripping down nude would be nice
Can the fancy program animate this to where Mrs Grecht shows her large breasts?Would be greatly appreciated.Also, love the Wizard of Oz stripping. Even though, dick sucking is apparently very popular.
>>9068877Well, I do appreciate it, Anon
>>9068724And thats how the movie ended early
>>9068941Can it even do 2D stuff?
>>9068941>>9069246>Can it even do 2D stuff?Certainly. Tends to make it a look a bit more realistic than strictly cartoony, though.>>9068897This also demonstrates why I'm less enthused about using it for stripping, and tended to just make characters magically naked instead; it doesn't really tend to remove clothing in a convincing way. It's better there with real photos, but even so, clothes will often phase through limbs or simply vanish when you tell them to take it off.
>>9069394It looks like its tweened
>>9069418Yeah, the more flat and 2D the starting image is the more it will look like puppet rigged flash shit.
>>9069394Since you’re doing 2D now, do you think you can make them kiss? Sorry if it’s a little plain
Requesting a video where Frankie removes her bikini and starts flexing her muscles
>>9069394Hey mang, thanks.I appreciate you doing this, even though it does seem off, as a 2d animation. But still appreciated.If you ever jump back to Liar Liar, I highly reccomend some tit flashing from Jennifer Tilly.
>>9069435>Since you’re doing 2D now, do you think you can make them kiss? Sorry if it’s a little plainSure. Honestly, plain is much preferable to a lot of the things people request.Although I don't know what the heck is going on now, I tried that one twice and for some ungodly reason I got stuttery results, like it was repeating frames. Two new, then two repeats of the last one, then two new, then two repeats of the last one...there's a lot of bizarre errors that seem to crop up. But I restarted the system and it doesn't seem to be doing it anymore (with a quick tiny-resolution test), so I'm giving it another try.
Jesus, nope, did it again. I'm guessing the upscaler is somehow screwing up...the two new, two repeated pattern fits with giving it a batch of four. I'm going to try dropping it back down to batches of 2.
>>9069430I think you're better off trying CG cartoons to get it work.
>>9069435
>>9069502Thank you, Anon! I like how it kinda goes 3D for a moment. Much appreciated!
>>9069502If you told me this was a cutscene I’d believe you
Like this is the kind of nonsense I usually get when directing that people take their clothes off,
Since 2D stuff seems to work steadily. Can you make this face perform a blowjob? Aeolus did a piece of her, i'm curious to see if this can work from a screenshot from the movie.
>>9069550Huh, you weren't the guy that asked for this one, were you? It looks like it's the same character in different lighting. Or at least, "disembodied head floating in a book" seems like a fairly rare character type.
>>9069552No, that's someone else. I didn't think someone did this with his art.
>>9069459Jennifer is still hot, and was hot in the movie. So i wouldnt' mind some Jennifer stuff for this thread.
>>9069550Wow. This is insane enough I have to post about it, even if I think I shouldn't post the resulting video itself. I tried to run it with a prompt of>(Animated cartoon style:1.5). A yellow woman's (disembodied head:1.2) floats hovering above the pages of a book. The camera rotates to a profile view as a man appears and she sucks his penis.What I got was the head wobbling around for a moment, followed by a scene shift to an almost exactly on-model Lisa Simpsons, complete with red dress and pearl necklace, giving a blowjob.Actually - with some mild cropping and censoring, here's what it gave me.
>>9069580Oh god, this is terrible, its the opposite of what had been given.
Another one for the Anon making the kissing videos
>>9069596Well, I don't know about the opposite, I can see how it ended up in that general direction with the yellow and the animated cartoon bits. But I was startled to see such a specific and precise character pop out.>>9069550Got this, it's not utterly awful, although it seems like it may not be inclined to introduce new characters in the same style previously seen or demanded.
>>9069598That's actually a little better. Surprised to see it gave her a neck.
>>9069602A little better than "randomly, here's Lisa Simpson instead?" That's not a particularly high bar.>Surprised to see it gave her a neck.Yeah, I got a couple results in that direction before posting that one. They all had necks; the more dramatic failures manifested torsos as well. Never got just the head.
>>9069605I mean. Its a little better, not in a high way. The lisa head is just a little concerning. This confirms the AI cannot do things with just heads.
>>9069597And this one is giving me repeating frames again! I wonder, could it possible be from the diffusion model itself? Something about the definitely-cartoony style makes it generate subsequent frames without any meaningful change? It.s conceivable, I suppose...
How about something a little different. Have the lady in the black dress strip off everything to give a lap dance grind on the guy's lap with that big booty of hers.
>>9069611Yes, I'm getting repeated frames coming right out of the sampler! Jesus, how unexpected.
>>9069597Blah, really bugging me. You can see those little tiny hitches where it repeats frames. I was hoping it might be somehow a result of the french kiss lora, but it doesn't seem to be, nor to be from having a strong mention of "cartoon style" in the prompt; happened even when those were taken out. But I haven't seen it in anything other than these clearly cartoonish generations. Very strange.
>>9069680Despite the flaws, I still love it! Thank you, Anon!
>>9069680it kinda works.
>>9069623
>>9069699This one came out more simple and straight forward. The computer smiling was a nice touch.Thanks man!
Gonna throw a CG request here. Have this woman pull off her shirt to reveal her milkers as she shakes them left and right
Does anyone here use comfy wan with Linux? I use a 10gb card and I can never get it to work without freezing my system, yet it works well on windows with the same workflow.
>>9069459>I highly reccomend some tit flashing from Jennifer Tilly.>>9069578>Jennifer is still hot, and was hot in the movieWhich one is she, anyway? Same one giving the blowjob in the earlier generation?>>9069704Milk, eh?
>>9069713>Which one is she, anyway? Same one giving the blowjob in the earlier generation?Nah, the short haired blonde later int he movie that Jim Carrey's character is defending.Video ref:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MlbB-HcNpIA subtle handjob under the desk, a tit flash or even her just bouncing on Jims lap, I'd be a happy JT fan.
Ok, one more of the two on the left kissing again and the one on the right watching.
>>9069713No this is Jennifer, that was a different lady. Oddly enough it did look like Jennifer was gonna blow him too. >>9069713Someone actually made a request in the drawco thread with this lady, and I will admit I am surprised to see some good nsfw on her here. I outta look up some CG to see what can work for this. mpdm
Let me throw something with CG before I call it a night. Please make this dancer twerk by showing her big booty
>>9069713Those look nice and suckable, thank you
>>9069713Can you do more with her?
>>9069735There's the stuttering again, like clockwork! Incredible. I guess it must be something in the art style of the image that makes the sampler return semi-regular, repeated identical frames.
>>9069767Wow, I’m surprised that’s still happening. But it still looks pretty good to me.
>>9069767This is, sweet?
>>9069748What big booty is that?>>9069759>Can you do more with her?Eh, I'd rather work on other subjects.
>>9069784Could you do one more with Dorothy and Glinda making out?
>>9069785Did it with the live-action.
>>9069785And a quick try with this. They didn't really jump out at me, but when I checked, there were a couple of repeated frames in this one, too.
>>9069923>>9069938These are both great, Anon! Thank you so much!
>>9069784I think he was referring to the lady being big in height
>>9065492If you wouldn't mind sharing your workflow, that would be great, anon
>>9070226Sure. Uploaded current one I'm using to https://files.catbox.moe/gpqd56.jsonIt's an ad-hoc modified version of one that the creator of the Smooth Mix checkpoint (which I'm using as my default) recommended. Meant to be as versatile and automatic as I could reasonably arrange; I put some notes in to hopefully explain things along the way. Can supply it with either a source image or (short) video clip, and it will by default resize the source based on a specified smaller dimension. I have a boolean toggle just below there which probably won't be relevant to anyone but me - I have a rather inexplicable bug where, if I use a lora, video sizes between about .4 and .6 megapixels take much longer to process than they do normally, so I put in a mechanism to automatically pick a size which should be just outside the upper side of that danger zone.Another toggle down in the lower part, to swap to generating at 24 fps instead of 32; this is mostly for the sake of matching movies, where a sudden shift to a higher framerate can be very noticeable.Apart from those, it's mostly just put in your image, prompt, and run. I want to devise something to be able to more easily toggle off and on the model-based upscaling without breaking and remaking links, since that step takes non-trivial time. Bypassing unfortunately doesn't work right there because the MODEL, not the image, is the first input for the node, so if I bypass it sends on the model as if it were the image result. Annoying.
>>9064414I choose to believe this was davinci's original intention, but was limited by the technology of his time.
Something a bit different, but could the Anon making the kissing videos do this with Scarlet and her mother from Gone with the Wind? Apologies if the quality isn’t great https://youtu.be/DxYUDjfxTjY?si=jRo-yJ0-UJhL0FvW
>>9069830Youre the Man, mang.
>>9070413Did three additions here - unfortunately it was pretty much impossible to avoid the face and hair shifting substantially by the third.
>>9070594Really appreciate you making these, Anon. You are the best, man.
>>9070619Hah, certainly, you're welcome.>>9070353Careful with that encouragement.
>>9070646If I find anymore classic movies, specifically with mothers and daughters, I’ll definitely suggest some more kissing!
What's funny in these is that, even though I definitely don't ask for it, I often get brief glimpses of some ambiguous source for the liquid being dropped - something that looks vaguely handlike or penisy or in this case, a pan or something?
Ok, I found a clip from the Watchmen movie of Silk Spectre and her mom. https://youtu.be/JRK5jdobvtM?si=JYyA4NzQw6r1hQJ7
>>9064414something something rich Lords fund the artists to continue their gimmick
"The Bath," by Jean-Léon Gérôme.
all the grokgods give up, or is something doable?
>>9070973I still mess around with it with my simple toon gals showing breasts prompts or similar.https://files.catbox.moe/cykku9.mp4Batman meets the WallBut I do wish there was a good tutorial or examples of different things this Grok can do.I know it can only do animations up to 6 seconds but what all can i do in six seconds?
>>9071099well you can "continue" something by pasting in the last frame. video generators aren't great at continuity, though, so it's hard to get what you want and also not have things randomly transform.
>>9061619Grok 4.2 releases in 3 or 4 weeks
>>9071123Yeah true and i wonder if I do copy and paste the last frame, will it even let me contunie to lewd it or pop in with that moderated shit, even though I just did a bunch breasts and crotch showing shots.Its a weird site, cuz it lets some generated lewd things slide by but you have to keep pressing the redo button like your saying, " Come on Grok, do me a solid, you know I'm over 18." lol.https://files.catbox.moe/h3ej8z.mp4>>9071203>Grok 4.2 releases in 3 or 4 weeksCurious how much this effects NSFW stuff.
I just got into this (grok) and I think I'm getting decent at prompting it. You have to communicate with it so strangely. It's kind of like programming
>>9071240what way of communicating would that be? also that's definitely doable stuff right now, although it might get modded a few times. it's nudity (with uploaded images) and beyond that's difficult.>>9071232i've tried it, if it's a sexual frame it will get blocked a lot. some images seem to be hopeless to work with, even if there's no genitals. if you don't know, it's way more lax on images it generated itself. if you upload them even nipples get the block. they should probably just add a continue option.
>>9070646>>9070666>>9070695
>>9070698Hm, bit of a problem with this one is that apart from the brief and somewhat poorly lit beginning, it's all shot - reverse shot, no profiles, so there aren't a lot of good moments to begin that would actually capture both parties.>>9071330Yeah, that's approximately the consistency I'm going for, gooey gooey goodness.
>>9071403My bad, man. It was the only clip of them I could find and I apologize for that.
>>9071407No worries. I'll give it a shot anyway with an enhanced contrast version of the first part, but the quality of the result may not be quite up to par.
>>9071415Thanks again, Anon! I can’t say enough how great you are for doing these.
>>9071299It's like it combines everything you say into some dreamy stream of consciousness then rolls the dice with it. You have to remind it that her panties have perfect coverage right after you say she shakes her ass in the camera or it shows her pussy and gets moderated. And you discourage its horny "imagination" from getting carried away at exciting words / imagery by using negative reinforcement, like tell it the image of the huge-assed woman is actually very small-assed, or the pretty face is hideous. And you have to keep track of what words it understands and use them even a bit out-of-place sometimes. Key words I found are: same, similar, unseen, no [x], slightly, very, supernaturally, subtle, offscreen, repeatedly, oscillating, turn, jump, jiggleYou know any tricks?
>>9071423well, that's a bit troublesome when you do want those things, but i guess it's not everyone bothers fighting the censor. i hadn't thought of telling it to keep stuff offlimits to keep the borderline stuff safe.not sure what tricks, figured some stuff out but it's specific. what are you interested in genning?
>>9071449>what are you interested in genning?Image to video of 3D characters getting as close to porn as possible while avoiding moderation
>>9071299>if you don't know, it's way more lax on images it generated itself. if you upload them even nipples get the block. they should probably just add a continue option.Oh yeah, i know. been messing with it for a month now and the majority of my lewd stuff is character generated. I mean, when I uploaded a lewd drawing I did, it kinda moved it but there wasnt a option for spicy. This was a month ago, so I understand it.I just hope this new update is more lax, even with generated characters. I just wanna show some gals jilling it and squirting or even getting their tits sucked or played with. Simple stuff.https://files.catbox.moe/cfbhlr.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/8t88ov.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/eei7xg.mp4>>9071240Sometimes i just type out what i want the character to do or as a story with extra details. Sometimes it works and sometimes i gotta figure out which word is alerting the moderation,lol.>>9071423I've used snap to, cut to or zoom into also.
Man, the color issue when splicing into movies is insane and maddening. The frames effectively match when I use the comparison node in the workflow. The first frame of the generation will appear indistinguishable from the last frame of the movie when I e.g. open them both in VLC, perfectly match their window sizes, and alt-tab between them. But then when I actually line them up to run from one to the other in the video editor, the dress becomes a more intense green at the moment we flip over. How? Aaagh. I'm not even doing anything different than I did with the ones where it worked out well!
>>9070698Poor quality, but here.The women definitely seem to get younger and more supermodely when I do this, even when I specify that they should be mature, older, etc.
>>9071476Well, thank you again, Anon! I know the quality isn’t great, but I still love it.
>>9071452guess i don't have much, deform and puffy seem to create nice titty effects. the grok ai is also very context aware, so making some things implicit: (ex: the word pull when hands are near clothes occasionally causes undressing basically by itself) works. i'm curious how you use your tags specifically though.
This one is more of an odd one since I found it in a group, but it would make good to see it in motion. Can you see if you can make the guy who's got the boner smash dat ass and bust a huge load in dat jiggly booty?
>>9071232Hoe you did this? I want to see the good stuff
>>9071576Majority of the prompt after Grok re-wrote it: A cartoon-style illustration of a jovial German woman in Oktoberfest attire, surrounded by a festive crowd.I think I originally added for her to have large cleavage showing and made sure she was a mature woman and burly bodied.Then for the video I simply said: A Penis flies byNow this was a month or so ago, so IDK if the flying penis will work now.https://files.catbox.moe/wlmxtz.mp4
>>9071595Im gonna try this out it looks like grok only allows nsfw stuff from them and not outside stuff
>>9071605Yeah, seems to be.Kinda been fun for me to do for a quick dopamine of interest.
Here’s one with Ariel and Ursula from the live action remake of The Little Mermaid. Wouldn’t mind seeing them make out. https://youtu.be/dsEUZAI2cRo?si=pi8eIHTgmAw6gp_J
>>9071232I hope it's less restricted, atleast for 2d and 3d/Blender pics. Anyone what's in 4.2 for Imagine?
>>9071652>when you hit her with the hentai aphrodisiac
>>9071618The first transition is a pretty harsh one; the camera is sort of "drifting," as are the little blue glowing dangly bits on Ursula's outfit, in a way I couldn't possibly hope to match. Apart from that, I think it turned out decently well.
>>9071618>>9071901Also, the 4 mb limit is kind of harsh on this one given the size and length; I uploaded a better quality version to https://files.catbox.moe/6tuhbv.mp4
>>9071476Your gens are some of my favorite on the site right now. It's interesting seeing clips turn into lesbian kissing in a believable way. "Alt timeline" stuff. Unfortunately I can't think of ideas to contribute; mother daughter stuff in media tends to be mother child. Just spent 15 minutes going through my watched films and legit found nothing appealing (they seem to make sure to never cast simultaneously attractive mothers and young adult daughters) other than wondering if there is a scene in the John Adams miniseries with Laura Linney and Sarah Polley.
Don't listen to Grok for advice on making prompts. It just regurgitates retarded theories from dumb redditors and presents them as official facts
>>9071901>>9071907Thank you so much! I do wonder if there’s a way to make the kissing a bit more passionate and lustful, if that’s possible.
>>9065793We can finally put the sex scenes into Casablanca, Gone With the Wind and Twelve Angry Men that were missing
>>9066405This is still more respectful than what they're doing at the Vegas Sphere
>>9066564And that's why she used to be known as Frances Gumm
>>9068778If only Gilbert Gottfried had lived to see this
>>9072058What was missing?
>>9072043I think I know what you mean. I prompted for terms in that direction, aggressive, intense, passionate, eager, without a great deal of obvious effect. I've largely been using here a french kiss lora, which is pretty decent and adds 'tongue action' but does also trends towards a slow style. But I don't know, the last clip of that one for example was only using the lora at a strength of .2, since I was wanting to change things up a bit, and it still didn't look much different that way.
>>9072058>put the sex scenes into CasablancaThat is indeed the next one on the list
>>9072279I still love the kissing you’ve made, but I do wish it was a bit more intense.
>>9072304Sadly, I just ran through a few times with similar prompting for passionate kissing and without the lora, and the results were even more tentative, so I think this approximate level is about the best I'm going to be able to get, unless I hit upon more successful prompting tricks.
>>9072397I do appreciate you trying, Anon. And I thank you again for making them!
>>9072291They better be hot
>>9072568What they are is slow. Trouble with having a high quality source video is that it practically compels me to generate clips that are themselves in high resolution (and therefore slow, currently running about 12.5 minutes per generation for 864x1184 upscaled to 1728x2368). And then I also get very picky about the specific content depicted in the videos, throwing out most of them, so the whole thing takes exponentially longer...
So did the grokslop thread get merged with this now?
>>9071524Two different parody movies. This might work
yes
For the kissing videos Anon, here’s one from Scary Movie. I think it might work for you, hopefully. Just have them make out, if you can. https://youtu.be/GKIkiqGK3wY?si=Sx3s3kIxSi53KABg
>>9073135Man, apart from the one where here dress splits and retracts, I could believe most of those were legitimate recordings.
Well, this was laborious! Five stitched clips, and quite a lot of head-banging to get ones I thought were adequate. Really ran up against the model being uncooperative in a few places, too, absolutely refused to depict what I was telling it to. And unfortunately, time constraints here make Rick into the proverbial 'two-pump chump.' Ah, well.Posting the 4mb version; the full-sized one is uploaded to https://files.catbox.moe/54tvjt.mp4
>>9073265Pretty impressive! I like when Rick took the woman’s hat off so he can fuck her mouth.
>>9073295That was one area where it was somewhat uncooperative - I tried to make him just knock the hat off in the process of grasping the back of her scalp, but nothing doing, it would only come out as a deliberate grab and removal.
>>9073302That would’ve been much better and somewhat more in character for him
>>9073265I can't wait to watch Lawrence of Arabia where Lawrence is a big tiddy gyaru and all of the Bedouins are big tiddy arab futas.
>>9073135Oh man, this is perfect. I just wish she tweaked or pinched her nipples abit.Would love a vid of a celeb doing a interview as her assistant is teasing and tweaking her nipples.Hope for more.
>>9073265I wonder if this was the porno Peter had that got taped over
Here’s a video with Wednesday and Morticia from the Netflix Wednesday show. There’s a few scenes in it that would probably work for kissing. https://youtu.be/0ShBj1HzBJ4?si=z9C6IFG9WjIdTT5B
>>9072750Since you didn't specify, I can only assume that these two are the "them" you mean.
>>9073634lol my bad! That’s on me, sorry for not specifying
>>9073636(I am of course joking - I just thought it would be funny to try it with the skeleton)
>>9073634This isnt too far off from happening in the movie
>>9073265>It (1990, Director's Cut)
>>9073638I did laugh lol it was pretty funny
>>9073634IDK why I found the snap change of expression so funny.Like she was suddenly possessed like Heretery.
>>9073661It's obviously a mind-controlling kiss skeleton.
>>9073643What scene can we get out of that?
>>9071652Nice
>>9073589Came out reasonably cleanly, I think.
>>9073890That's an A+Willing to upload the uncompressed video?
>>9073895It's smaller and shorter than the others, there's not really much degradation there. But sure, here's a bigger version: https://files.catbox.moe/ugznf6.mp4
>>9073890Is there a way of getting Morticia to caress Weds, open her own blouse and Weds sucks on her breasts?
>>9073902Appreciated!
>>9073907Based on a quick test using one of my intermediate frames, it looks like it should probably be possible to get something like that. Not going to do so right now at the very least, though. Also we have to keep in mind that undressing is almost uniformly really bad and unconvincing, vid related.
>>9073890Absolutely great! Thank you! To be honest, I wish this actually happened in the show lol
Goth milf tits for the win. While we're on the subject of daughter/mother bonding. Can you do some titty sucking for Selma Blair's character(she's the big breasted one) here with the mom sucking on her breasts?https://youtu.be/WG_6o6E2d3I?si=YFrBS0oWmLVECGAt&t=28
>>9064960Tim's reaction lol
>>9074047Funny stuff
>>9074047>>9074124Yeah, as I recall I said very little about what he should do, so him sticking his tongue out especially is just concept bleed from her instructions. Worked out in an amusing way, though.
What happened to grok gooners?
>>9074223wym?Also why does grok like to zoom in now when making videos
>>9073921Ah, i see.I guess it doesnt understand how to just pull down part of the dress to reveal the breast, without having her take off the whole thing.Feels like the problem i have with Grok when i just want the character to do a nipple peak/ flash.Appreciated though.
>>9074223Busy making more tit flashing vids.
Just want to say thank you again to the Anon making those kissing videos. Before the new thread, I was hoping you could make another with Maleficent and Sleeping Beauty making out from the second movie. https://youtu.be/gBfhIr4W3YI?si=WNGeY2uG8vo_jZRQ
>>9074228Not sure specifically, but some of my many accounts have this issue while others work normally. My guess is that its a shadow ban of sorts. Just create a second account
>>9074171You made it work though
>>9074026Seems like the model really doesn't know what to do with breast or nipple sucking, it'd probably need a lora for it and there isn't one (at least not on civitai).
>>9074459Nothing wrong with a mom bonding with her stripper daughter
>>9074459Hope someone gets to adding a titty sucking feature since I was gonna suggest something for it
>>9074459The wild thing is I think the checkpoint made her tits smaller lol
>>9074276Jesus, the people uploading these clips. The actual video appears to be at 24 fps, but it was uploaded at 30 fps, causing repeated frames. I loaded it into the video editor at 24 fps and generated at that rate, and now I realize that the editor dropped DIFFERENT frames than the duplicated ones when dropping it to 24 fps, so the intro section looks choppy and terrible, with both duplicated AND missing frames.
>>9074276Patched something together to address it more or less with an open-source transcoding tool 'handbrake,' though.
And a slightly higher quality, significantly larger version: https://files.catbox.moe/e9dgzj.mp4
>>9074721>>9074724Thank you, Anon! Really hot kissing!
>>9074717>The wild thing is I think the checkpoint made her tits smaller lolYeah, that's a real phenomenon, it's trained more on videos of real people who don't have absolutely cartoonish anatomy, so if the breasts aren't already pretty much fully exposed before we begin, they'll likely end up smaller when taken out.
Im here for the AI video generation addict anonymous meeting.
>>9074734
>>9074320it seems to be an update, it does it on all new accounts
>>9074721>>9074724Looks real.
>>9073921I would’ve requested Enid sucking on Mortica’s tits but there arent any clips of them together online
>>9074459Hey, awesome!Now were cooking with gas.
>tfw no bush
>>9074826 that would be hot
I never even played cyberpunk
>>9075240>>9075238>>9075235>>9075233>>9075231I only recognize the source for the BttF one, but very nice.
>>9075218
>>9075231I was expecting her to do a blowjob
>>9075231>Marty decides to become his own father
>>9074717I didnt notice until now
Grok Imagine lets you make some sordid stuff. Frankly I'm appalled. https://streamable.com/a2hnhf
>>9075263Would
>>9075740Lol
>>9075254Tit flashing is good
Threads taking a while to die
>>9076035Does grok always give them kind of robotic motions like that? I've noticed it in a lot of the grok posing videos, a pattern of rapid shift - hold still, rapid shift - hold still, et cetera; is it a specific thing that's being prompted for or just how it turns out?
>>9074320>>9074228great so Grok got lobotomized again, atleast it isn't just me
>>9075254>>9075240 is Jenny Agutter in Logan's Run.
I can take nude pinups and have grok give them clothes, then make lewd videos of the edited one with grok Imagine (and post them on SFW boards hahah) >>9075255
is it weird of me to think that Grok swapped spit with Gemini recentlyall of its generations have the same type of motion and zoom in regardless of prompt, it's eerily similar to how Gemini moveswhy would it be acitng like this
>>9070646looks like she got a fresh coat of paint!
i have a bunch of princess leigh and and xena, but no where to post them. this is the only place posting similar stuff to this. do yall have a discord or something?
>>9076147damn shes really hungrymoarand image source, if its an artist
>>9076529Don't know the ultimate source, I got the image from >>9075526
>>9075254>>9075238 is the late Princess Grace Kelly of Monaco during her actress years>>9075238 is the late Michelle Trachtenberg>>9075233 is Reese Witherspoon>>You are brown
>>9076352>Xena has smaller tits than Gabisad
new thread: >>9076852
>>9076667what did you make it with?I use grok now but that looks like a good NSFW thing, whatever you're using
>>9076888Wan, or more properly a wan merge; it's smooth mix at https://civitai.com/models/1995784?modelVersionId=2260110 . Plus a couple blowjob loras tossed in there.
