>>33666847
bump

are you old?
the ancient way of using the phone only for arranging meets is long gone
good news is text game is way easier and faster to acquire than rl game

>>33666847
yes absolutely normal, this is genuinely best case scenario. relationships always go to shit once it gets to extended periods of not seeing eachother and being exclusive to online/texting. its easier to misunderstand eachother online + youll end up arguing way more frequently.

>>33666847
This is normal. Unfortunately the girl who is connected to me acted like a fucking retard

>>33666991
Distortions and distance. Assumptions and misperceptions.

I said this in the very beginning. She didn't listen

>>33667234
shut the fuck up tripfag

>>33666847
You're doing fine

But the thing is, I'm a young adult and on the phone every few minutes. Does this count as neglect from both sides?

bump

>>33666847
sounds like you have got yourself a non-degenerate partner who is not staring at their phone 24/7. nice catch.

if you want to communicate, even if not present, maybe try to call?

>>33666847
I'm sort of in a similar situation. While I don't particularly like the feeling of having to wait hours on end for a reply when I do text her, I do like not having to be on my phone every 5 minutes, especially when whatever task IRL is engaging. I understand it goes both ways, and not accepting that would be possessive.

Still, I would advise you to place the situation in the greater context. My issue with this girl I'm seeing is that I'm worried she's not putting in as much effort as I am. She barely displays affection, has forgotten things I've told her that are important about me, and sometimes straight up doesn't seem to be paying attention when I'm talking to her. The fact that she takes so long to reply only adds to the feeling that she's not that interested.

>>33666991
Also this is true, we've misinterpreted each other a lot more through text, less so through calls but it's always best IRL. Still though, place in in context.