Why is it immoral to only want woman for their bodies?
>>33742663says who
No shit lol, it's a human being not a commodity dipshit.
>>33742663It's not if you're open about it and they are fine with it.
>>33742674No, what I mean is that I treat them fairly and all, I just don't have any special interest in them other than sex.
I won't read chin-scratcher threads. He suffers from delusions.
Go see a hooker. Now, end thread.
>>33742663we could say the same for women only wanting men for their resources. its built in, although grossly oversimplified
It's not, stop being a bitch about it.
Do you really not want to have any sort of emotional connection
>>33742663It's not. Both males and females feel that same thing. Fatties are just upset that nobody sexualizes them for their bodies.
>>33742663I wouldn't say it's immoral. It's more very shallow.
>>33742700You just did
>>33742741Nah, don't want my feelings hurt and don't really care about what people do with their lives
>>33742700>I won't read chin-scratcher threads. He suffers from delusions.I would call him delusional so much as insufferably lame, passive-aggressive, entitled, resentful, and obviously devoid of experience in the matters that he "wonders" about. He is also a kind of Howie, never seeming to advance or learn. Therefore he is not worth reading.>t. The real "I won't read" guy
>>33743148>I would call*I would not call
>>33742663It's fine as long as you're sincere that you have no interest in them as people and only want their bodies. The immoral thing is being disingenuous about it.
>>33742663You are aromantic and people are discriminating against you to try and control how your demographic behaves. It's literally the matriarchy.
>>33742663How do you feel about men only wanting your body?
>>33743148no one cares what you do or dont do
