If the person you're in love with is super non monogamous, should you take the opportunity to sleep with them? Maybe it could lead to them being monogamous...Or maybe it's better to love and have sex with and lose than to have never had sex at all...Or maybe sex is good even if it is non monogamous....Thoughts?
I never fell in love with someone like this but I'd probably try it at least once. I guess. If I get tired I'll leave.
>>33748934>If the person you're in love with is super non monogamous, should you take the opportunity to sleep with them?
>>33748934Bump
>>33748934>If the person you're in love with is super non monogamous, should you take the opportunity to sleep with them?Only if you are non-monogamous yourself. You need to understand that being non-monogamous is not a lifestyle choice; it's not determined by your behaviour. It's a bit like a sexual orientation. If a man has sex with other men, he is probably either gay or bi, but he doesn't *become* gay by having sex with men; the fact that he wants to have sex with men is a *consequence* of him being gay. If he stops having sex with men he hasn't somehow "become straight". What actually *defines* being gay is how your emotions work: who you're attracted to, who you fall in love with.In the same way, there are some fundamental differences between the ways that monogamous and non-monogamous brains process certain emotions. Non-monogamous people feel love more strongly than monogamous people ever can; but they are unable to experience jealousy in the way that a monogamous person does. They're all love and no hate.So, there is no possibility at all that you can "convert" a non-monogamous person, any more than you can change someone's sexual orientation. And if you are monogamous yourself, getting involved with a non-monogamous person is a terrible idea.
>>33748934Life passes like a fleeting rain, eventually merging with the ground. Start to live, even if its for one night.
>>33748934What I'm understanding from this:>I fell in love with chad>Chad will always have better options>Will giving chad what I THINK he wants make him choose me over others?I legitimately don't understand how can women be so retarded. But sure, go ahead and do it then come back crying about "muh life is so hard. Nobody loves me" when you'll eventually be tossed to the side. I don't even need any more context to know this is what you mean, it's obvious.
>>33753591OP is a man in love with a woman.
>>3374893490% of the relationship havers on /adv/ would have all of their issues solved if they just refused to date non-virgin women. I keep reading thread after thread after thread of you fags crying about problems that wouldn't exist if you just refused to date used up cunts.
Assuming you are a woman, you are on track to being the 99%, do whatever, regret it.If you are a man, I don't know how you can love a non-monogamous woman, but you should only do it if you are sure you can not stay in love after it.Get your sexual satisfaction and then use that post-nut clarity to fuel your resentment for degeneracy and to feel ashamed for ever loving such a filthy person.And it's a free driving lesson, in a way, maybe that can help you.Now, that might cost a fragment of your soul, depending on how stable you are mentally. It personally wouldn't affect me, I can see myself casually fucking someone, but I have never done it and passed chances just because I wasn't that horny during the opportunity windows.And in the end I am kinda glad I didn't, as I can frame it as remaining pure for my pure gf that eventually came my way.
>>33755909The guys who refuse to date non-virgin women are severely autistic to begin with so removing that requirement wouldn't fix anything.
>>33756268>as remaining pure for my pure gf that eventually came my way.where did you meet a pure gf
>>33756420College dorm, Im older and reserved, but always studying in public spaces, which drew her attention.She is young and Christian, and met me before college could corrupt her.
>>33748934>If the person you're in love with is super non monogamous, should you take the opportunity to sleep with them? No, you're in love with your idea of them not the person they are.>Maybe it could lead to them being monogamous... Absolutely not, that kind of person sees sex as cheap thrills rather than a deep bonding experience.>Or maybe it's better to love and have sex with and lose than to have never had sex at all... In that case I'd say no, you're going to develop some serious inferiority complexes from fucking with an insatiable person and wanting affection you'll never have to yourself.>Or maybe sex is good even if it is non monogamous.... If you're just looking for a quick fuck fine but you'll be cheapening your own part of a beautiful experience.>Thoughts?You deserve better than that. Find someone who wants *you*, not you and half the town with you.
>>33756268>my pure gf that eventually came my wayYou actually believed her when she told you she was a virgin? You didn't stop to wonder how many other men she had said that to? Silly anon.
>>33751256What kind of AI slop is this answer?
>>33756613Popping a cherry is pretty definitive proof, especially if you have multiple experiences with doing so.
>>33751256>Non-monogamous people feel love more strongly than monogamous people ever canShit bait. They cannot love someone enough to commit themselves to not seek pleasure in others
