Can you truly love two other people when you're in a threesome relationship?I think this is something that I want. I think it will be beneficial to me.
Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I would avoid at all costs.
>>33772002Why? Aren't you just multiplying your love for one person into two? Double the fun, double the love?
>>33772011it's more like spy vs spy than an isekai harem anime
over 90% of all poly couples crash and burn, nobody NORMAL wants to watch or engage with their partner and a third party.You are just mentally ill.
Threesomes are the best only when they're a one time thing and ideally when you're not involved in the relationship between the two other people, because there will 100% be crazy jealousy/envy happening at one point.
>>33771988it's a recipe for jealousy and disaster, that's why threesomes should only be a casual sex thing
>>33771988>Can you truly love two other people when you're in a threesome relationship?Some people can; most people can't. A "normal" brain can't achieve this, but some people have a much greater capacity for love than average. Whether you're one of them or not, I don't know. The basic rules for ethical non-monogamy are: - Everyone who is in any way involved must be fully informed about *everything* that is going on. ("Everyone" here means not just you and your partners but all of *their* partners as well).- Everyone who is in any way involved must be completely okay with it all. - All relationship rules have to be symmetric and universal; so, for example, you *can't* ever say "it's okay for me to fuck other people but it's not okay for you to do it".- Don't get involved with monogamous people.
>>33773263>not just you and your partners but all of *their* partners as wellNo, this is an exclusive threesome relationship. The only partners each has remains just those three. No outsiders.
>>33771988Don’t men try this just so they can dump the first girl for the second girl? Men don’t want a harem without a woman being humiliated that’s why there is nothing sexier than a crying woman. >>33772011This is cope your penis will always chose the pretty one over the loyal one. Men are whorepilled.
>>33773365>No, this is an exclusive threesome relationship. The only partners each has remains just those three. No outsidersFine, but the rules still apply.
>>33773564Fine then.>>33773506I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. A crying woman who has been hurt is a complete turnoff. I don't want a harem. I want two women to be my life partners that I will love equally for the rest of my life.
>>33773662>I want two women to be my life partners that I will love equally for the rest of my life.Are you expecting them to love each other just as much as they love you? If you're not, that means you're breaking the "universal and symmetric" rule - you get to have two partners while they're expected to have only one each - and the whole thing is definitely doomed from the start. If you expect not to be any more important to them than they are to each other, then that may work; but the chances of finding two bisexual women who are both crazy about you and crazy about each other aren't that high, so brace yourself for disappointment.
>>33773722>Are you expecting them to love each other just as much as they love you?Of course. Most definitely. I thought that's what a threesome was...>but the chances of finding two bisexual women who are both crazy about you and crazy about each other aren't that highMeh
>>33771988I don't think you understand how tenuous such a setup would be. The amount of trust needed from all parties would be astronomical, and everyone would basically be walking on eggshells to make sure no one was undervalued or ignored. And that's just everyday shit, the bedroom aspect would be a nightmare to manage all its own. You might be able to handle a one-off threesome, but how exactly do you expect to ensure both ladies are fully satisfied in the bedroom all the time? If you make one partner cum more often than the other, you think that isn't going to wear on the one struggling? You have no idea the logistics it takes to keep two women satisfied on a day to day basis.
>>33771988From what I gathered relationship with one person can be hard and exhausting. Now if you add a third person into the mix it will probably complicate things a bit more.
>>33775565>relationship with one person can be hard and exhaustingDoesn't have to be.
>>33776251(NTA) I think the point that managing even one relationship isn't always easy; managing three at once is a lot harder.
You can want it, doesn't mean you'll get it. The problem isn't what *you* can do, the problem is that you have two people *other* than you involved in this and there's not really a way to be sure that that's what they want as well.>t. tried to get some kind of 3 way relationship going, one was cool with giving it a go because she had the confidence, while the other pretended to be cool with it just so she could get to me, but froze up when it came down to it and then tried to act like we forced her into this situation or some shit
>>33776378>t. triedeh
>>33776378>she then tried to act like we forced her into this situation or some shitkek women are crazy
i browse relationship forums out of boredom during work and every polygamous relationship crashes and burns.either you are born into a community that instills this from young (like some religious sects) or you are 50+ and are swingers.
>>33776520oh come on man
>>33776540come the fuck on
>>33777177come the fuck on
>>33778590Fuck the cum on!
>>33771988Of course you can. The trick is people don't like your affection to them being shared with another. But if you find ppl who are into it then more power to you. As for me i wnbl
>>33773506You literally can not fathom the depth of my capacity for love. Sometimes it feels like the more love a person has to give, the less they will be loved
>>33781421Yeah! :D
>>33781431Omg
>>33781431Damn
