[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/adv/ - Advice


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: a5i3jn.png (76 KB, 314x301)
76 KB
76 KB PNG
What kind of psychological profile would you give to someone that repeatedly uses a pocket pussy without washing it for days? I'm trying to figure myself out.
>I make $28/hr
>I can Incline bench 250lb, Squat 315lb, and do pullups with 25lb
>My room is generally clean.
>>
File: Schopenhauer.jpg (102 KB, 413x515)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>34209903
1/2

You are a high-functioning, instrumentally organized individual whose self-regulation is intact in domains tied to performance, visibility, and measurable output. You work consistently, train your body with discipline, and maintain external order. These capacities rule out global impulsivity, executive dysfunction, or depressive withdrawal. Your difficulties, such as they are, appear only in low-visibility, low-accountability zones.

You relate to sexuality as a functional discharge system, not as an arena of intimacy, symbolism, or self-expression. Pleasure is permitted but stripped of narrative weight. The repeated use of an unwashed sex toy is not an expression of carelessness, but of categorization: once an object is mentally classified as disposable or instrumental, it is excluded from the hygiene schema that governs the rest of your environment. You are aware of contamination risk, but that knowledge remains abstract because the behavior does not challenge your self-image or produce immediate negative feedback.

Your cleanliness is externally referenced. You maintain order where disorder would be seen, judged, or felt as identity-threatening. What is private, episodic, and unseen does not reliably trigger corrective behavior. This reflects a selective attenuation of bodily concern, not a lack of standards. Your body is optimized, trained, and pushed, but not consistently treated as something that requires gentleness or caretaking.

The addition of anonymous forum use, specifically environments oriented toward irony, antagonism, and status signaling, clarifies the deeper structure. You seek validation in spaces where identity is depersonalized and deniable. You want recognition without exposure, approval without obligation, and mirroring without relational cost. This is not social incompetence; it is risk management. Anonymity allows you to test worth, opinions, and dominance without vulnerability.
>>
>>34209903
2/2

Taken together, these behaviors point to a personality organization marked by emotional minimization and defensive self-containment. You invest heavily in domains where rules are clear, metrics are objective, and outcomes are controllable. In contrast, domains that involve dependency, care, or ambiguity are flattened into mechanics or outsourced to impersonal systems. Validation is sought, but only where rejection cannot wound the core self.

This is not narcissism, nor is it avoidant pathology in a diagnostic sense. Rather, you operate with a restricted intimacy bandwidth. You allow yourself desire and recognition, but only under conditions that prevent genuine mutual influence. The unwashed object and the anonymous forum serve similar psychic functions: both allow gratification without engagement, release without maintenance, affirmation without being known.

Clinically, this configuration requires no intervention unless it begins to generalize. It becomes relevant if you notice increasing disgust tolerance toward your own body, recurrent neglect of health consequences, or escalating reliance on anonymous validation at the expense of embodied or relational feedback. At that point, the pattern may reflect a broader avoidance of dependency and care, rather than mere convenience.

If intervention is indicated, it should not target behavior in isolation. The work lies in examining why certain things do not register as deserving care, and why validation is safer when detached from identity. When those questions are engaged directly, behavioral corrections often follow organically, without coercion.

In essence, you are not disorganized. You are over-contained. The behavior does not reveal disorder, it reveals where you have decided, quietly and efficiently, not to look.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.