[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/adv/ - Advice


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I didn't want to make this thread on /his/ because I'm not trying to discuss the provenance of Buddhism or anything, I'm looking for help from Buddhists. /his/ feels like it's 96% christians and nazis for that matter.

Can killing invasive insects be permitted in Buddhism?
I've had an ant infestation in the past, and the ants had to be killed. I've had a hornet infestation in the past, and the hornets had to be killed. I've had a termite infestation in the past, and the termites had to be killed.
Every year, in the place that I live, there are enormous swarms of lantern flies that kill plants and crops in the summer time. Most months out of the year, there are carpet beetles that get everywhere.

I keep a tidy house, I don't leave food laying around, I dust and sweep and vacuum, I keep the windows shut, I've had the house treated for termites, but I still get insects.
I'm mindful whenever I kill an insect, but I still feel terrible about it.
Theoretically I don't NEED to kill them, I theoretically COULD live my life in a house full of ants, hornets, termites, and carpet beetles, and for that reason I feel bad for not making a bigger effort to protect those lives. I feel as though I am prioritizing my comfort over the lives of thousands of creatures.

I love insects, I don't like to hurt them. I don't know what to do to reconcile all of this.
>>
killing anything is generally frowned upon, because it opens the heart to thinking things like that are a solution. relocation/redirection are always preferable, where those are not possible? then yes, reluctant extermination, done without malice, where the killing method is not cruel, you are working towards a better future where you will not have to do it and the goal is the prevention of greater harm and suffering, is permissable
>>
>>34330652
Passivity is a killer too. When you fail to eradicate a hornet's nest, someone's 3 year old toddler mindlessly encounters it while climbing a tree. The hornets swarm, the kid is stung 1,000 times, the kid falls, the kid dies. And all because a narcissistic aristocrat from Tibet who abandoned his own wife and child told you his ruminations from the depths of his belly button.
>>
File: ro37lxz1625e1.png (951 KB, 858x841)
951 KB
951 KB PNG
>>34330818
>>
>>34330652
Hmm, if you don't want to harm them, then that requires a sacrifice. Letting your house become infested with insects.

If your goal is to be a Buddha "of the straight path", then that's what you should aspire to.

If you're a human, then killing them to prevent the infestation is also correct. Humans are selfish towards other beings by nature. And other beings are too. It's that simple.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.