[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/adv/ - Advice


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Too many seem to be selling a course and have "proof" that could be easily fabricated, or string you along with a long tirade of information about relationship dynamics but then only give you one tiny hint as to the answer to "how to score with any hot girl using this one weird trick!"
So who's actually legit? What books or videos or resources are real and actually going to improve my skills with women? Do any of them give it all away for free? I'd trust someone just asking for donations.
I don't want to fuck a lot of girls but I want to be good enough that when I do meet a girl I want to get to know, I can ace it.
>>
>>34375052
It's mostly bullshit. Over-theorizing and micromanaging your actions will make you even more autistic, not less. Most people who get dates have never done any research on dating.
>>
>>34375052
The trick isn't to score with a hot girl. It's if you can tolerate her crazy personality as a gf after post nut clarity
>>
https://the-real-chad-move.com/ is free
>>
>>34375061
what he said.
>>
>>34375061
>Most people who get dates have never done any research on dating.
shit advice.
this doesn't mean they know nothing, they simply learnt flirting and socializing early on.
>>
>>34375242
no you fucking autist
they learned by doing
you're going to make mistakes
>>
>>34375180
read a little bit, it is actually some sound advice, haven't got to the meat yet though but you need to lay the foundations before building a castle.
there may be hope yet, thankyou anon.
>>
>>34375284
>no you fucking autist
>they learned by doing
exactly what i said, they did things, before me, which i have not done yet.
>you're going to make mistakes
>implying i haven't already.
which is what brings me here looking for the best info to learn what i have not yet.
also
>help in bad faith
thankyou for your input, no more will be necessary from you.
>>
File: The mystery method.jpg (70 KB, 662x1000)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
just fucking read it. Maybe there are slightly better texts on the subject but pretty much everything is derivative of the mystery method.

Once you have read it, move on and go out and abandon the theory for doing whatever works for you.
>>
>>34375180
this was really fucking good, read the whole thing, but that advice is from over 20 years ago, for an american traditionalist christian girl, the dating landscape has changed MASSIVELY and it misses out some important parts i think, like methodology for things like cold approaching, which you will almost certainly have to do with a virgin christian girl (she will not be on tinder) and making a good first impression.

it's a lot of important info, if you are a bluepilled newbie to all this.

so for example, mr chad move says to set the date for atleast 3 days from meeting her, if not, 9 days. but i just read an article from 2025 on dating post-covid saying that almost any date set for over 3 days, the girl would flake on. this is probably because of the change to immediate gratification culture we have now, and maybe you don't want a girl like that and that's a good filter ... but it's going to filter out everyone in this day and age.

you have to remember as well, people DATING in 2005, were raised in the 1980's with that culture. that's how far removed this advice is from now.

tl;dr read it but remember we live in a different era now. i think things need to be quicker and a little more suave and charismatic, even for good virgin christian girls, who are EVEN LESS common now than then.
>>
>>34375052
It's like reading a book to learn how to drive a car, you're going to learn something, sure, but you won't be able to actually drive a car. I had to meet multiple girls before I've developed my social skills enough to be smooth
>>
>>34375052
You want to be with women? Get a gf? Have sex? Here is the non secret every incel hate, be social.
>>
>>34377500
Not OP but I learned driving from playing the video game Cars for Gamecube. So what video game do I need to play to get good at relationships?
>>
>>34375052
It's a bit normie tier but I advice Charisma University on youtube and for books I advice Mark Manson's Models.
>>
>>34375052
Iirc, someone shared how a lot of those PUA authors have ugly wives.

I think it’s better to try to become a normal person first. Step 1. Quit 4chan.
>>
>>34377677
>Charisma University
i considered that guy, charlie, right? charisma on command? i've seen him for years and he seems pretty genuine, might actually give him a shot.
>Models.
another one i see recommended a lot. will read it.
>>34377727
>Quit 4chan.
>>34377505
>be social.
doing well at both these things. barely use 4chan these days and i have some classes and church on the weekend and probably going for a beer with my mate afterwards so i am actually fully booked this weekend with things that other people are at.
>>
>>34375052
Picrel improved my social confidence and success by about 300%. Unfortunately, by the time I read it I was out of college and no longer encounter women anywhere
>>
>>34380251
This book was uselss for me, it all seemed like simplistic common sense tropes. Still couldn't put any of it into action in the real world though.
>>
>>34377561
Discord
>>
>>34380324
Yeah. Especially
>Just say their name
comes across as super inauthentic unless you're already socially skilled enough to where you don't need the book.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.