here's a little tip about sleep, take care of your health!
>>34401075Correlation isnt causation.It seems probable that the lifestyles of people who sleep at that time are the actual cause of the rate reduction and merely changing your bedtime by itself wont have any effect.
>>34401093True, but correlation matters nonetheless.If you have two roads in front of you, and choosing the left one is related to a 24% higher rate of sudden death than the right one's, would you go through the left one?
>>34401150If the left road is 2 minutes faster?
>>34401075:o>>34401093>>34401150hmmm
>>34401150hey I know that memethis guy died after eating a pink fruit, so his death is correlated to said consumptionhowever, there's no immediate proof that the pink fruit itself kills, maybe the eaten fruit was poisoned by someone else, or maybe the guy was sick for external reasonsin any case, correlations are just steps towards determining causationafter seeing a bunch of people dying from eating pink fruits, I would avoid them!
>>34401218Thats idiotic. An actual example would be if they just found a dead guy and a purple fruit.
>>34401218>>34401093ultimately, the "correlation does not equal causation" fallacy is fallaciously written, it would be more correct if it was written like this "correlation doesn't always equal causation">>34402098are you sure? you have no immediate proof that the other fruits are noxious even if you in person saw him eating one, maybe those fruits are actually edible, but the one the guy ate was poisoned, or the guy had an allergy to said fruitcorrelations on their own are just patterns that might or might not have further meaning pointing to a clearer causationafter all, what is a causation if not a correlation that you're sure that will be confirmed frequently enough to matter?
here's another tip, sleep regularity is important!
