Should I convert to Catholicism?
>>34458262If you can gaslight yourself into believing it (usually your family or state education does it for you) I guess any abrahamic religion would improve your life since you can always say it's god's plan or some retarded shit like that. If I could believe I would, but as of now I'm still the typical r/atheist that view religion as a child tale, thought it's undeniable that it's useful to some people. Maybe it'll be useful for you anon
>>34458262probably yeah i was atheist for a little while but when i saw what was happening in the world i was like oh shit atheism actually kinda doesn't exist and it turns out you just have to pick a side in the broader eschatological scheme involving the jews and the christians (catholic church). besides i really can't stomach that vain impotent scientism and/or kantian realist covering law dogma it's really such a retarded epistemological position this idea that existence is only properly adjudicable by the latest axiomatic verificationist methodology when things like incompleteness theorems exist and american pragmatism has shown how untenable some of those assumptions are read c.s peirce's some consequences of four incapacities and look into the methods of ernst mach and some of the early pragmatists who had a lot in common with logical positivists except differed in the interpretation of the results and arrived at a more wholistic epistemological system that doesn't exclude religious experience or vainly seek to prioritize a very narrow band of scientific thought above all other kinds of thought or experience.
>>34458262better then being an atheist
>>34458262Pray to God to see if you do want to become a catholic
fuck it, why not? if you're just going to pick and choose what you think the truth is, you can always switch to something else later on
>>34458262No. Jewish religion designed to subvert and destroy europeans.If you want to be religious, follow your ancestral flavor of paganism/folk religionOrganized religions are cults for retards.
>>34458338>it turns out you just have to pick a side in the broader eschatological scheme involving the jews and the christiansno you don't
Out of all the main christian sects, catholic theology is the least absurd. But then you have to grapple with the fact that the one true church jesus left behind is hellbent on the destruction of the west and the extinction of white people. I could never square the circle
How do you people think you'll manage to reconcile the differences between your personal values and beliefs and those of Catholicism? Asking for a friend
>>34458262What's wrong with the religion you follow (if any) now?
>>34458768I don't, i just stopped being interested in catholicism
>>34458768There is no way to do that without living a life within the doctrine of that denomination of Christianity. If you marry a convert, or convince a person to convert, then they must adopt the same dogma. The world, at large, no longer has respect or willingness to accept older codes of ethics and behavior. By all appearances, we live in a time of being willful and arrogant. Individuality is more important than belonging to a community in the eyes of many. It seems very few take the time to consider the responsibilities of faith.t. Episcopalian
>>34458972>The world, at large, no longer has respect or willingness to accept older codes of ethics and behaviorNor do a lot of clergy
>>34458974Judgement begins at the pulpit. Or so I seem to remember.
Beat yourself in the head with something and you'll dumb yourself down enough to be religious.
>>34458599the point is that the choice of indifference is just complicity with the other side, the mark of the goyim. jews believe goyim are beast-like, therefore the acceptance of that proposition may in fact be the mark of the beast. the people who relieved themselves from the responsibility of rejecting such the mark will get it regardless. you think the AI powered pax judaica police state is just going to let you grill in your back yard you must be severely retarded.
>>34459159heres another naive devotee... at least it's possible not to naively commit oneself to religious practice it being a superset of the mode of rationality in question, whereas the secular person neither skeptically adopts modes of rationality nor believes in something more than them but rather they believe in this particular mode of rationality, this particular theory of truth, implicitly this particular (cartesian, kantian) epistemology... rather than recognizing phenomena and recognizing that in the study of phenomena these modes of rationality constitute relatively small transformations of human consciousness, to the extent that the operative aspect is some idea of correspondence, coherence, or w respect to the availability of evidence, or w respect to the uniformity of conclusions, the breadth of the audience, etc are all relative to a communicative scenario... to cross ur arms and scoff at religion because you have false pretenses of 'scientific' knowledge is by a long shot the less complicated and more intellectually naive thing to do.
