>>34474533
It's to do with problem solving & competition. As a man it's addictive to argue online because two mental itches are being scratched.

1) Problem solving. The topic/discussion/point/argument is the problem. And by engaging in it you attempt to solve it.

2) But there's a second or third or fourth other person involved typically another male, who thinks his solution should win out. And that yours is stupid and his is the best. This creates competition to try and prove the bastard(s) wrong, you see?

So combine the two and you get a very addictive catharsis that promotes anger but gives the relief from quelling that anger by "winning" the argument.
Theres nothing wrong with arguing, just make sure it's to argue for something important and can actually help your life or someone else's in some way.

If you wanna lessen it, just find physical problems to solve instead of verbal. Puzzle solving IRL or doing some physical work that involves problem solving like repairing it building something or maintaining something.

>>34474533
No you don't

kek, i feel you.
But in my opinion i’m just speaking facts.
Like it feels awesome to just give people a reality check. My head is just automatically roasting those retards but for a good reason.

>>34474533
Why would you want this, are you retarded? You need to tell people the wrong opinions™ about your correct opinions™. Don't lower yourself by placating people keep fighting annon .

>>34474533
unironically the saying "mad at pixels on a screen" got me to realize internet arguments arent really all that important.

touch grass, as the zoomers say

Valium
Ambien
codeine (or another opioid, but not heroin)