File: 1546350979325.jpg (146 KB, 1100x739)

146 KB JPG

>would that impact you personally at all
Yeah because it'd be really cool. Xenobiology would be a legitimate science, and there'd be all sorts of new information to learn about.
>Would your beliefs or politics change
No. Why? This is always a dumb question.
>Would you live your life differently with the confirmation there's alien critters?
Yes, I'd shitpost about ayy bacteria on /an/.

>>5045207
>No. Why? This is always a dumb question.

It might make somebody more thoughtful or retrospective or something.
Maybe they previously thought space was a waste of time, but the confirmation of alien life completely changed their entire view on the matter and now they're obsessed with space.
Didn't you ever have a moment as a child where you learned something so astounding it basically changed how your brain worked?

I don't care at all if retarded space bugs are shitting on Mars. I got bills to pay.

>>5045201
Are they fuckable?

For me personally it opens up interesting questions on the origin of life. Did it happen independently or did microbes migrate from one planet to another. Or did it come from anywhere else?
It also increases the likelihood of life being found elsewhere.
I'm not much of a religious or political person.

I always thought it was interesting that microbial life appeared on earth the instant its surface had cooled down enough for the chemistry to be possible (~200-500 million years after formation), but the cambrian explosion of complex multicellular life didn't happen until over 3 billion years of just microbes and gross mats of shit.
If microbes evolved independently on Mars, I think that proves that life slop should be basically everywhere, but proper aliens would still be super unlikely and require conditions to be stable for a very long time.

So basically every livable exoplanet will still be boring rocks as expected, but also you have to worry about alien diseases.

>>5045315
>Did it happen independently or did microbes migrate from one planet to another. Or did it come from anywhere else?

This is on my personal bucket list of, "things I want to know before I die."
If the Mars fossil does turn out to be a kind of Stromatolite: did life on Mars independently evolve or does all life in our solar system share a common ancestor? Would we then have to leave our solar system before we found actual-actual aliens or what if those are distantly related to us too?
It would be v. fucking cool (but also kind of ominous) if every "alien" we encountered shared LUCA cells.

>>5045201
Why would anything change. The universe is infinite with infinite planets and stars systems of course there's going to be life somewhere else. It's just common sense, it would be lame if that wasn't the case.

>>5045201
>would that impact you personally at all
Yes, it's exciting and interesting and I would be extremely curious.
Also no, it's not unexpected.

>Would your beliefs or politics change
No

>Would you live your life differently with the confirmation there's alien critters
I see myself and all life on Earth as alien critters already.

I'd point at the night sky with a basedface

>>5045201
Microbial life is probably everywhere in space. It was thriving on earth when it was still pure hell.

Finding an evidence that there was on Mars is interesting to study how it works, but not that surprising.

>>5045201
>Would your beliefs or politics change?
I do not believe I could hate the Hebrews any harder, but I'm willing to keep an open mind.

>>5045810
boring yesses are almost always the right answer after all

>>5045814
>It would be v. fucking cool (but also kind of ominous) if every "alien" we encountered shared LUCA cells.
might also end up just proving we wouldn't be able to prove if they were or weren't related to us, could be that our brand of life is the predominant and most likely type of life possible.

>>5045810
>So basically every livable exoplanet will still be boring rocks as expected, but also you have to worry about alien diseases.

Another finger on the monkey's paw curls.

If the Mars life shares a common ancestor with Earth Life, I wouldn't really care.
If it arose independently, I'd be worried that means there's some sort of great filter in humanity's future since life would be common enough to arise twice in the solar system and yet we see no sign of other civilizations.
In either scenario, I'd also be a bit peeved that we wouldn't really be able to send astronauts to Mars without having to worry about destroying the Martian Biosphere.

>>5045810
I thought Earth's instability was a big part of the cause of selection pressures that encouraged multicellular life. And tbf multicellular organisms were already exploding with diversity even before the cambrian, we just don't have as many edicaran fossils compared to cambrian because the were all so soft-bodied
>>5045921
Me personally I'd onionsface

>>5046498
The thing is even if mars had life there's next to no chance it still does, and pretty much no chance we'll be able to find intact DNA to study

>>5046766
>I thought Earth's instability was a big part of the cause of selection pressures that encouraged multicellular life.
If earth was always unstable there would never have been life.
Earth has had huge periods of stability or very gradual change interspersed with sudden extinctions from short catastrophic events.
So contrary to popular opinion, the Earth has never been "perfect" for life, but rather had the bare-minimum required stability and precursor chemicals.
Which is still extremely rare.
I would definitely argue against the instabilities selecting for multicellular life.
Every time there has been a mass extinction it is always more detrimental to larger complex animals than simpler smaller ones.
Remember -
The dinosaurs went extinct.
BUT
The far more ancient and simple cyanobacteria (stromatolites), archaea, Cnidarians, Ctenophores, Porifera etc still exist.
>>5046766
>multicellular organisms were already exploding with diversity even before the cambrian
The Ediacaran macroscopic fossils were all Cnidarians, Porifera, Ctenophores, Algae, cyanobacteria and maybe some ultra-primitive echinoderms. Very restrictive by today's standards.

Here is a Cnidarian from the Ediacaran that's still around and the first evidence of muscle fiber tissue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haliclystus_sanjuanensis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamsetia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haootia

The universe is so large that if you cant accept that there is at least some simple life on some faraway backwater planet you are just dumb.

>>5046826
Nobody has to accept something that has absolutely zero evidence of being true.

>>5046826
it's probably true but the difference between probably and actually is larger than your pea brain could ever comprehend

>>5046842
>>5046884
retards LOL

>>5046767
there could easily be some subterranean or "shadow" biosphere we don't know about and this is just the beginning of learning about it

File: 1727046009923281.jpg (159 KB, 524x478)

159 KB JPG

Microbial bacterial life in the universe wouldn't be too surprising or interesting. I'd be more surprised if it didn't appear.

It's anything beyond that that would be captivating and absurdly unlikely. I think we're most likely alone in the universe and just managed to win the lotto. Or intelligent design.

>>5046949
I love it how nobody ever considers that an actual all knowing and all seeing god wouldn't need to directly "create" any life.
He could just create a planet and solar system with conditions he knows will always lead to the evolution of life.
Like a god version of the Urey and Miller experiment.
Then you can have a god that's free of all the logical inconsistencies the conventional Abrahamic vision of god has.
Who knows, maybe he didn't like the dinosaurs because he thought they were ugly and not very talkative?
So he sent a meteorite on its way to help the promising proto-mammals with their evolution.
Just to be clear, I don't think god actually exists. I'm just brainstorming a more "realistic" vision of him.

>>5045201
You are all dogs. I would go on as usual.

>>5046966
You're describing a modern variant of the "watchmaker god" some people having been using to reconcile intelligent design with evolution for a few decades now.

>>5046970
Such a God would have to be supremely evil, apathetic and indifferent to anything that isn't himself or that doesn't entertain him.
If God is the universe he would have no family, be sexless and without form or shape, be completely and be utterly inhuman. He must love himself like the ultimate narcissist because he's never once considered killing himself over billions of years despite being completely alone and the only member of his kind.
He's never created an equal to himself as a friend or partner and instead has chosen to create little ants(life), in a tiny ant farm (Earth), that he enjoys burning to death forever with a magnifying glass.
The ultimate psychopath.

>>5046992
>Such a God would have to be supremely evil, apathetic and indifferent to anything that isn't himself or that doesn't entertain him.
never understood why atheists believe that their views on morality are universal. God can be benevolent while allowing for things you find unpalatable to occur. For example, free will. Free will creates the grounds for every sort of evil to happen yet if God truly loved us He'd let us choose our own path regardless. See what I mean? Feel free to apply a retroactive hypothetical to my statements if it makes it more digestible by the way, I'm just throwing stuff out there.

>>5046992
lmao you're unhinged. God gives humanity paradise and all humanity can do is whine about it's not their fault they're ruining it.

>>5046999
>never understood why atheists believe that their views on morality are universal.
You believe that your God's morality is universal and god himself believes his morality is universal. Are you talking about "atheists" or yourself?
>For example, free will. Free will creates the grounds for every sort of evil to happen yet if God truly loved us He'd let us choose our own path regardless.
I don't think you know what "free will" means. God sending people to hell for all eternity simply because they don't believe in him isn't "free will". That's outright eternal slavery with no chance of escape.
>I'm just throwing stuff out there.
You're an ant infected by cordyceps fungi doing what ants infected with cordyceps fungi do. Spreading the cordyceps fungi.
>>5047001
>lmao you're unhinged. God gives humanity paradise
Of dying from cancer as a teenager?
>and all humanity can do is whine about it's not their fault they're ruining it.
How can you ruin something that was already ruined?

>>5045201
I would like a planet full of sentient jellyfish.

>>5047025
Hell isn't in the bible

>>5047030
Either is the trinity, any concept of an afterlife or heaven then.

>>5045201
it'd make me wonder if there's somewhere else out there we could live, or if we'll ever make contact with intelligent life elsewhere

[spoiler]my schizo theory is that their used to be an intelligent life on venus but they fucked it up so bad with pollution that it became a living hellscape, and what was left of life was seeded on earth & mars

>>5047030
It is. It's the Lake of Fire.
>>5047035
All of those are in the Bible

>>5045201
>wwyd?
If they're cute female aliens and willing to come to earth, procreation. Otherwise I'm not interested and doubt anything will change.

>>5045201

Aliens would be highly satanic satanists that turn all the little children gay

File: 1739146142790760.jpg (49 KB, 736x735)

49 KB JPG

>>5047025
>You're an ant infected by cordyceps fungi doing what ants infected with cordyceps fungi do. Spreading the cordyceps fungi.
This is just embarrassing...

>>5047025
>it's another "retarded atheist who has never studied theology makes sweeping statements about religions" episode

>they find fossils on Mars
>it's all human
What do?

>>5047092
>>5047089
>he didn't compliment my god. I'm going to cry now. There's nothing else I can do now.

>>5047116
Isn't that the plot of a movie?

>>5047025
I love how all atheist in 4chan never go past the reddit level atheism, for example, muh hell, muh cancer, etcetera.
Get new material! This becomes boring after 25 years of the same worn out and meaningless """arguments""".

>>5047147
>>5047092
>>5047089
>All anon needs to do is provide one convincing argument in favor of his god instead of samefag crying to himself in defeat.

>>5047147
All atheism leads to gnosticism after enough dips in the quantum physics pool

>>5047230
Maybe you are too retarded to even debate. You wouldn't even listen if God himself came down from heaven and kissed your forehead.
You are the one trying to look intelligent by debating Anons on /an/ about the existence of God, something that not even full on professional philosophers can dispute, because the furthest they can go with their line of thinking without being hypocrites is "we will never know and we can't know if He exists", meanwhile we've known He exists for more than 2000 years.

Let's go back to talking about the precious possibility of proving alien life, and eventually having Xenobiology, can you imagine that, friend? Existing to see alien life being discovered? I think that's better than arguing over something you don't even want to hear or learn from.
Best wishes for you and your family, atheist Anon.

>>5047232
>The physics departments at universities are well-known Gnostic hotspots?
>Gnosticism famously predicted the existence of atoms and subatomic particles?
>Wax is basically water if you light enough candles?

>>5047238
>The physics departments at universities are well-known Gnostic hotspots?
ironically they are

>>5047237
why do you think the only alternative to atheism is believing the creator of the universe solely favored and only applied his standards to a few middle eastern savages, and the proof can be found in a book that despite being accused of being divinely sanctioned and protected from corruption, is blatantly wrong about things ranging from made up historical events (that it claims prove the religions validity) to incorrect natural facts regarding the origin of life and the age and shape of the earth and where it is in space

>>5047237
>Anon's 142 words of crying with not a single convincing argument in favor of god. Summed up as "I'm upset that you're not stupid enough to just blindly believe in my sky daddy".
>>5047240
>why do you think the only alternative to atheism is believing the creator of the universe solely favored and only applied his standards to a few middle eastern savages
Because he can only justify his imaginary god by creating imaginary enemies. In his mind, uncontacted rainforest tribes call themselves atheists or demon worshippers. No different from the way communists think random supermarket shoppers must call themselves capitalists.
Extreme delusion.

>>5047230
all you have to do to be convinced of God's existence is to reach out and ask Him to show Himself to you. But you're not interested in it in the first place, and there's no point arguing. I personally haven't even argued with you... I just found your anti-theological rhetoric bizarre and shortsighted. See >>5046999

>>5045201
The little green and gray guys have been sucking people up in space ships for thousands of years. What do you mean "what if"?

>>5047440
>all you have to do to be convinced of God's existence is to reach out and ask Him to show Himself to you
Lol, literal unmedicated schizophrenic logic. Great. Amazing point anon. What an amazing person you are. Anyway...

>>5047442
>The little green and gray guys have been sucking people up in space ships for thousands of years.
Aha, the anal probes. Very cool. They use faster-than-light travel to explore the human digestive system. That is rather concerning.

>>5047453
>literal unmedicated schizophrenic logic.
You're so dumb. You still don't understand that I'm literally not arguing with you. To be clear, in the Christian faith, it is explained that to learn of God and to believe in Him, you have to develop that faith and ask Him to come into your life, you can't just be convinced because that would go against our self-determination. If there was a coherent and straightforward argument in favor of belief, like Pascal's wager attempted to be for example, then everyone would just "convert" because it's "proven" or "irrefutable", which would mean nobody actually cared about it, it would just be a fact of life. Christianity is a relationship between you and God, and God won't make you follow him just because He wants you to. We COULD argue about the merits of the belief system but you made it clear at the beginning you're not receptive to it. So instead, I said
>idk why atheists believe their morality is objective, so weird
>what you said here was embarrassing
and
>if you're actually interested, attempt to follow the faith and have a mustard seed of faith, and ask God to enter your life.
So whatever.

>>5047453
>They use faster-than-light travel to explore the human digestive system.
Yes. Much like humans use nano scale transistors to shove cameras up animals asses for scientific reasons.

>>5047461
>you have to develop that faith and ask Him to come into your life
Aka, literal schizophrenia.
you can keep that disease to yourself anon.
>>5047467
>for scientific reasons.
Lol, you mean measuring the body temperature of a sick animal anon?
I don't think anyone would care about grey aliens probing them if it cured their end-stage cancer.
But no. It's never for any actual reason.
So-called "contactees" are hallucinating illogical fantasies of aliens that don't make any sense because they're hallucinations.
90% of the time they're just copying popular movies too. Kind of embarrassing that anyone takes those nuts seriously.

>>5045201
>If they do end up finding life/fossils on Mars (or Mercury or Europa), would that impact you personally at all?
If they're sentient, religious people will attempt to convert them. Even if that involves risking the whole planets destruction.

>>5047490
>Aliens adopt hinduism and colonize the moon
>Over time the moon turns increasingly brown

>>5047510
Well, If the bodies of 1.5 billion Indians were laid on the surface of the moon side-by said to cover as much surface as possible.
It would cover this area -

(150cmx40cmx1.5billion) / (100,000^2) = 900 square kilometers of Indian on the moon.

Tycho is a small lunar crater barely visible with the naked eye from earth.
It's 86km in diameter.
That gives -
A = π x r^2
so
((86km/2)^2) x 3.141 ~ 5,807km2

So unfortunately you wouldn't be able to see the brown dot of 1.5 billion Indian bodies from Earth
:(.......
Sorry for the sad news anon.
But science must march on.

>>5047521
It's not indians that would be turning the moon brown, but indian culture

>>5045201
If we find actual microbial life in another planet, we'll have the dilemma of how to study it without contaminating their environment with our own microorganisms. Chances are the probes have already introduced Earth bacteria into the martian soil.

>>5047534
>Chances are the probes have already introduced Earth bacteria into the martian soil.
THIS. Exactly. I don't know why this isn't brought up more often. Excellent point.

>>5047521
>bodies
You don't HAVE to out yourself as a tourist this hard.

>>5046944
>subterranean or "shadow" biosphere
If those turn out to be real fossils then there is a good chance there are still some life deep underground there.

>>5047534
Yeah there are tardigrades living outside the ISS. The first "finding" of microbial life will be a big headline for someone who wiped their nose while assembling the probe.

>>5047490
>thousands of people saying the same thing all over the world for thousands of years are just making things up because they saw a movie released in the 1950s
Damn reasoning with you atheists is pointless. You are intentionally obtuse and ignorant.

I'm guessing you don't think vaginas are real either, because you've never seen one?

>>5047794
>>thousands of people saying the same thing all over the world for thousands of years are just making things up because they saw a movie released in the 1950s
Lol, Christ-tard anon is equivalencing grey aliens probing asses with Jesus. Hilarious.
>I'm guessing you don't think vaginas are real either, because you've never seen one?
Jesus never had sex or a wife. So we CAN say with certainty that he never saw one. And he's your "perfect human" role model lol.
Oh dear, the lack of self-awareness is astounding.

>>5047801
You sound gay

>>5047804
Jesus was surrounded by twelve male apostles. Only peter is explicitly stated to have had a wife.
The other eleven didn't.
Jesus never had a wife or children.
Also, they were all circumcised.
Sounds pretty gay to me Mr N.Fuentes.

>>5047813
>responds with homoerotic fantasy with a focus on what the cocks look like
yep gay

>>5047817
So the bible is homoerotic fantasy then because it's obsessed with circumcision, Jesus never having sex and women being responsible for mankind being kicked out of Eden.
Gospel of Luke just had to tell us that Jesus was circumcised.
Case settled.
No wonder N.Furentes is gay.

>penis: exists
>this fag: and i cant stop thinking about it

>>5045201
It depends on the kind of life discovered, especially with respect to its degree of development and the quality of the evidence. How I imagine what's going on out there wouldn't change much if, say, something like the Europa Clipper, delivered unambiguous evidence of at least prokaryotic-level microbial life there. It would be quite another matter if something advanced and improbable as even a crayfish were discovered there, way under its icy surface, however that was done. The universe would seem to me more fun, since I abhor desolate sites and situations.

>>5047833
Your holy book is obsessed with circumcision so obviously it was written by "fags" going by your own logic.

File: 1736118544126622.jpg (52 KB, 680x398)

52 KB JPG

>>5047833
>penis: exists
>yahweh: amputate the prepuce of your children in woship of me (all mammals have this organ btw)

File: 1728781712757769.jpg (57 KB, 434x504)

57 KB JPG

>>5047490
>Aka, literal schizophrenia.
The entire system of Christian faith is about how God stays out of our business and won't force us to do anything, but will reveal Himself if we ask Him to. If you're uninterested in trying it out, then you're not interested in even entertaining it as possible. Which is what I've said about 3 times now. And you still seem incapable of understanding that.

>>5047867
Once upon a time, a canaanite disrespected god and tried to scam him. So god said, "how about you cut the tip of your dick off?"
As soon as judaism was expanded beyond the canaanites, god redacted that part.

Canaanites continued cutting off the tips of their dicks anyways, making them the biggest lolcows in history

>>5047456
Agreed. Scriptural bitches need to fuck right off.

>>5047875
So you worship a "canaanite scammer" then.

"The circumcision of Jesus is celebrated as a feast day in the liturgical calendar of many Christian denominations"

Also, Jesus himself never renounced circumcision. The first council of Jerusalem did, and that was after the death of Jesus. So you're another Christian that doesn't read your own holy book.

You ARE the "lolcow" in this equation.

>>5047872
>The entire system of Christian faith is about how God stays out of our business
Completely and utterly wrong.
Everyone who doesn't believe in Yahweh is automatically going to hell. It's force and everyone is automatically a part of the Christian system.
You're just resorting to knowingly lying now.
You're not saying anything of any value and you never ever will say anything of any value to anyone.

>>5047884
>bla bla bla i hate christianity
It was a joke, fag. No one actually takes religions seriously. They're just a convenient way to keep 105 IQ idiots from going off the rails and inventing their own morality like literally every single midwit/lowwit atheist does
>be lowwit/midwit atheist
>renounce christianity
>hate christianity IN PARTICULAR because it told you you cant do something you want
>instantly become a misanthropic gay vegan who supports legalizing bestiality
All of you are the same

>>5046826
The universe is fake and gay and always boring and nothing good ever happens. What reason is there to be something exciting like aliens in it?

>>5047888
>It was a joke, fag.
The "joke" is that you worship a literal Jewish Canaanite scammer who created your religion that you believe in.
>No one actually takes religions seriously
You take your religion seriously anon...
>and inventing their own morality
So canaanite scammers inventing their own morality.
>like literally every single midwit/lowwit atheist does
Abrahamics are atheists now?
>hate christianity IN PARTICULAR because it told you you cant do something you want
You love Christianity because you could strangle a thousand babies to death and you'll technically still go to heaven as long as you repent.
>instantly become a misanthropic gay vegan who supports legalizing bestiality
Vegetarianism has a long history in Christianity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_vegetarianism
Especially in the Orthodox church. One of the oldest denominations.
Also, Christianity accepts zoophiles as long as they repent. You guys accept anyone.
>All of you are the same
Said the 2.5 billion Christians who have followed the same person for two thousand years...

>>5047834
>since I abhor desolate sites and situations.
Yeah, but you live on planet Earth, not in space, and you can forget about colonizing mars or even just the moon in our lifetimes.

>>5047894
Yep, that's a salty sodomite.

>>5047899
Your hero never reproduced anon...

>>5047903
You're so mad at christianity it's like talking to a possessed kid from a shitty exorcism movie. Is your head going to spin next?

If I say Jesus Christ loves and forgives you will you hiss and vomit some green stuff?

>>5047894
This the schizo vegan that stuttered and typo’d merely copying and pasting a sentence praising god, couldnt actually write it himself, and got all pissy about saying christ is king? You might legitimately be possessed by a demon. You act like it, 100%.

Seek Christ. Read your gospels. Take your meds.

Prove me wrong and write a passage praising god and christ… with a pen and paper… take a pic and post it here. Prove to the world that demons aren’t real and you’re just a pissy autist.

>>5047931
>>5047919
>And like his hero, he'll never reproduce.
>sad.

>>5047932
You’re an atheist. Writing a little prayer on some printer paper won’t melt you. You don’t believe in any of it. And you get to own teh christards by proving you’re not even possessed by a demon and are just aggressively obnoxious about hating christianity for no clear reason (or because it said no sucky dicky, no fucky horsey)

Right?

>>5047884
>Everyone who doesn't believe in Yahweh is automatically going to hell.
Everyone who doesn't accept the Lord into his or her heart will be without the Lord in the end. That's what the bible says. You should at least read it instead of lying on the internet - and calling ME a liar. There's a ton of agnostic theological research you could easily dive into if you wanted to learn more, too. You're just angry.

>>5047030
>hasn't read the bible

File: Viking_Orbiter_releasing_(...).jpg (454 KB, 1200x1315)

454 KB JPG

>>5045201
>If they do end up finding life/fossils on Mars
They already did, but NASA was so shocked at the results of microbial analysis that they wrote it off as a likely error with the probe, despite the probe team arguing the results was a very strong indicator for life. But NASA still wrote it off as a false positive up until recently and are now reconsidering their findings. To make that perfectly clear: they tested for microbial life, found it, and proceedes to throw the findings into the trash because they found the things they were looking for.

It's mind numbing.

>>5048000
>and proceeded* to

>>5048000
source please

File: Viking_Biological_package.I.png (64 KB, 583x549)

64 KB PNG

>>5048003
Just look up "Viking lander biological experiments" and you will find a good number of articles dissecting the findings. Currently the argument is that the results are indicative of microbial life but the external conditions of Mars by conventional understanding makes carbon based life not possible, or at least as far as we under about that the enviromental conditions of the planet. This means that either:
>A) Microbial life can exist even without the exact conditions known for carbon based life to be present
>B) Because the external conditions do not match the exact nessasary requirments for carbon life, any positive result for microbial life is a false positive by definition

Shit is still hotly debated, but the tests conducted indicate life.

>>5048010
>as far as we understand*

>>5047989
>>5047934
>Every Christian apologetic either hasn't read the bible or is lying about the bible in order to win converts.

>>5048010
>Just look up "Viking lander biological experiments" and you will find a good number of articles dissecting the findings.

None of the results are indicative of anything. They all have very ordinary inorganic explanations.
The media hyped it up way past its use-by-date though.
Chloromethane, dichloromethane, water, methane, oxygen, carbon dioxide etc are all naturally found in space in the complete absence of life.

File: 26557164471_45b563f406_c.jpg (63 KB, 791x900)

63 KB JPG

>>5045201
I would have sex with skinny Bob

>>5048687
>The future of the human race is hydrocephalic east-asian albino prematurely balding dwarves with marfan syndrome, progeria syndrome and a failed human genomic splicing experiment with owls.

>>5048747
>future