>the year is 2074>the genes that give humans consciousness and the capability to understand science and spoken and written language have been discovered>gene editing techniques are widespread and cheap>you own a cat or a dogwould you improve its genes and give it the abilities that was born without? and is it abuse if you refuse to?
>>5064150i don't think i would want to subject my dog to the horrors of consciousness. he seems happy enough being a dog right now
No, but when they can genetically engineer a combo Pomeranian/Kangaroo (a Kangaranian™, if you will) that cunts can keep as a lapdog that also doubles as a purse, lemme know.
>>5064161>>5064263you are evil, you don't respect your pets, you see them as your property/slaves.
ofc
>>5064276cats aren't for fucking
>>5064150You have a very childish view on genetics
>>5064150eating the fruit of knowledge banned us from the paradise realm that cats and dogs still experience and made us mortal. it woul be straight up evil to forcefeed that stuff to another living being
>>5064603cats and dogs are mortal too, they even live less than we do
seriously think that tech will fall into normie hands? the min anyone makes a breakthrough theyre keeping it for themselves and their kin you will never hear about it nor have access to it
>>5064150No Hasan, nobody wants you to have sentient animal slaves.>>5064270Lol, Hasan has literally said that and he's the one that electrocutes his dog for moving an inch over a six hour stream.
>>5064277to quote a certain finnish poster on /int/:pets for somelovers for others
>>5064150I would do the opposite and make as many people as possible into dumb animals
>>5065202That took a dark turn lol.Sounds like you haven't heard of India or Africa.Do you really want more of that?
