How many species are there where the males are more beautiful than the females?
>>5081430That's entirely subjective.
>>5081430The word you're looking for is "colorful."Beauty is subjective. Some might find beauty in simplicity, with vibrant colors being gaudy.
>>5081430All of them
Lotta birds are like that.
>>5081430humans
>>5081467gay
>>5081497Men are just more attractive objectively. Men pull off masculinity and femininity better than women, whereas masculine women are hideous and feminine women are just normal.
>>5081430Too many to list, dumbass.
>>5081506whatever you say homo
>>5081451Beauty is subjective but it is also true that most people find butterflies more aesthetically pleasing than rotting carcasses
>>5081506Lol
>>5081467>>5081506Well, ok look you are right but for the wrong gay reasonsMen are objectively the more beautiful sex. It is true. When you look beyond your human sexual wiring that is. You can see that men's bodies are much more roust, larger and aesthetic where as woman's bodies just don't really have much going on. They have fat hanging from their chests to feed infants, but that is functional. Now of course as men we find women's bodies attractive, but objectively, their bodies are actually quite boring and dull when you think about it. Don't believe me? Go have a wank or two and then compare men's and women's bodies
>>5082047>roustrobust*
>>5081453Shut the fuck up pseud
>>5082047That's not what objectively means tho no?How do you determine muscles are more beautiful? Because of strength? Not having big muscles can also be an advantage, hence why many species don't have them, everything comes with ups and downs. There is no objectively beautiful body.t. Faggot who actually totally agrees with your statement on a subjective level
>>5082063Because muscles give shape and form and size. You can look at a red stag and compare it to a red hind. Even just ignoring the majestic antlers, you can clearly see that the stag is a far more beautiful creature than the boring, uninspiring female. The stag has power, majesty and elegance. The hind is just... well... it's just nothing note worthy at all. Likewise with humanity's sexes OBJECTIVELY speaking
>>5082065You just gave a second animal as an example, while appreciated that doesn't change anything, (neither does writing objectively in all caps). You just describe things you like. If you don't believe me maybe Google what objectively means?
>>5082066I reject your postmodernism. Beauty is OBJECTIVE because this universe has order and structure to it behind the chaos. All things have pattern. You can pretend you find a literal piece of shit beautiful, but that's because you are out of sync with the world. You are an aberration. You are a literal FAGGOT. Your head is all wired wrong. You wouldn't get it
