New Netflix Dinosaur documentary coming out next monthhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4ZBSzYUTL0Will we get some kinosaurs? Or more sloppasaurus Rex?
Which dinosaur will be gay? Which dinosaur will be black? Which dinosaur will be gay and black?
>>5099103We all know the T-rex will be fully feathered
>>5099103Netflicks is gay and we don't advertise here, chud.
>>5099114what if it was furred
>>5099127a furred lizard?maybe if it turns out to be trans-mammal
>>5099103I'm too lazy to watch the trailer does it have any jarring gay shit like feathered rex?
>>5099114dumbass>>5099131no, it's scaledif even fucking Netflix shows scaly T-Rex, you know featherfags have lost
>>5099131some chuds may find this to be jarring
>>5099135did they even use those stupid little arms for anything?
>>5099103>NetflixI think I'll wait for the reviews.
>>5099135It's fucking over for featherfags.We meme a lot about the topic here but i am genuinely happy the unscientific trend of "scientific accuracy is when you make shit up for no reason" is dying.For example the other day i was looking for Carnotaurus images as reference for a sculpture and found this claiming to be accurate even to nothing about its fossil suggests its horns were that big (if anything it proves the opposite because the horns are very tiny and not pointy in actual skull)
>>5099103Buy an ad, antiwhite netflix.
>>5099145Claws and horns aren't exposed bone in living animals so they wouldn't be in extinct animals.Making the horns larger than the fossils is only logical, but making them that much larger is not.
>>5099147Yeah, something like this is way more reasonable. Always remember, the more conservative a reconstruction of a prehistoric animal is, the better.
>>5099150An exhibition I went to had this model where you can compare the skeleton vs IRL. I like their interpretation; if they use the horns to tussle with one another it would probably make sense for it to be blunt.
>>5099103Pretty sure this is the first time a rhynchosaur has appeared on-screen in any capacity since 1992
>>5099145>>5099150>>5099172We have literally no idea how big carnotaurus’ horns were. They probably weren’t curved cow horns but that doesn’t mean they couldn’t have been significantly longer than the born cores>>5099147If anything we underestimate the size of claws, horns, etc. Sometimes to a significant extent like the saurornitholestes specimen that preserves the keratin sheath of the claws which are like double the length of the bone
>>5099103Dinosaur autist keep winning. Every major film production company bows to us.
>>5099183Looks like a snapping turtle.
>>5099188Just like real animals
How were the dino docs that apple put out? Are they worth a watch?
>>5099188I'll repeat it: The most conservative a reconstruction the better. Yeah we don't know how long they were but making them as close to the bone as possible is your best bet
>>5099188>>5099248Not to mention, if you make a drawing saying it's accurate and give it long-ass horns you are implying giving it small horns is inaccurate which is very obviously not the case. Draw it with long horns if you want but claiming that is the "accurate" version of the animal is fucking retarded
>>5099243It's good, but I dislike the chosen structure of the series compared to the chronological approach chosen by WWD or the hyperfocused structure of something like Dinosaur Planet. The series is mainly focused on the cretaceous peroid and does a lot of country hopping within an episode. The series offers a high density of information for people who are a little bit out of the loop in regards to the latest theories in paleontology but I feel like if I knew nothing about dinosaurs or the mesozoic I wouldn't be any wiser about what the world was like back then than after watching the show. The dinosaur reconstructions are excellent and the quality of film making is great even if the soundtrack is a little bit lackluster. The series is also quite bold when it comes to the portrayal of speculative behavior but that's more of a personal pet peeve than a real criticism.
>>5099252Cool
>>5099243What the other anon said except i want to add that the balloon neck sauropods are fucking retarded
>>5099256>balloon neck sauropodsThe wut
>>5099320They put inflatable sacks on Dreadnaughtus because accuracy is when you make shit up. Thankfully that is the only time i can think of where they did that.
>>5099103Black dinosaurs
>Dilophosaurus>Allosaurus>StegosaurusJurassic Chads, we are SO Back
>>5099330Ceratosaurus please...
>>5099183Didn't know they appeared in The Dinosaurs! (1992)Here's the full scene.I'm happy to get some new Triassic representation in paleo media.
>>5099135>>5099145Other dinosaurs and pterosaurs are shown to have feathers. Feathers are ancestral to Avemetatarsalia, deal with it
>>5099248>but making them as close to the bone as possible is your best betI can’t remember where it’s from but there was something I read recently about how there’s a general trend that the keratin covering gets proportionally larger as the size of the bone increases. So something like triceratops horns where the bone portion is enormous would have a significantly greater amount of keratin relative to size than something with much smaller horns like carnotaurus
>>5099114>>5099131muh t. rex babies covered in feathers part 2
>>5099418Seems reasonable to me>>5099455Why is this shit even a thing? there's literally no reason to believe that was the case
>>5099135>5099455see this you dipshit
>>5099498>can't link correctly
>>5099511it is what it istake the L and move on trannysaurus
>>5099252>The series is also quite bold when it comes to the portrayal of speculative behaviorThat's one way to describe Troodon LAYING FIRE.
>>5099513Is that the one all the speculation evolution people like to make sentient?
>>5099513>>5099521In fairness, Troodon's always been a spec evo guinea pig. Look at Dale Russell's dinosauroid from1982.>>5099485I don't see a reason to believe it wasn't either. Not unusual for animal babies to have different coating then adults.
>>5099531>Not unusual for animal babies to have different coating then adultsShow me one that is born with feathers and later replaces them with scales
>>5099455This and the peach fuzz cope are so sad to see these days. Just let it go bro T. rex was not feathered there's nothing wrong with that
>>5099137We don't know. But unlike with abelisaurs, they don't seem to be vestigial so they had to be using them for something
>>5099606It takes a while for the phenotype to catch up with lack of use. It's entirely possible (IMO likely) that 'rex had already stopped using its arms for anything meaningful, natural selection just hadn't finished getting rid of the arms just yet.
>>5099103>Netflix what's to expect? a girl-boss dino who fights the patriarchy?
>>5099655https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ysKtquZ4Iug
>>5099633Makes sense
>>5099694?
