>wikipedia now says birds are "avian dinosaurs" and they're not a class but a cladeFuck this fucking pop science shit. It's like saying we're bipedal cynodonts. It's like phylogeny means jack shit to these morons.
>>5115248>It's like phylogeny means jack shit to these moronsIronic
>t. bipedal cynodont
It's really funny how people keep confusing taxonomy with phylogeny.
>>5115248They don’t like it, that’s why. >nooo oyyyy veyyy the book of bereshit says yhwh created flying things before beasts of the land>why does “science” hate our holy tanakh so>help this is uh, liberals! conservatives please save us! feathered dinosaurs are gay communism or something Every time you call a bird a dinosaur, a rabbi goes oy vey.
>>5115291oh yeah you're one of those faggots who advocates for clades, aka "they're vaguely similar in some way so let's shove them all together under one name". i bet you call seaweed algae too.
>>5115248The article for "bird" doesn't say that at all, schizo
>>5115248I think conservapedia.com is more your speed bud
>>5115303The conservative bible project was a laudable effort, desu
>now saysThe following was added in 2006. Before you were legally allowed to browse this website.>Modern phylogenies place birds in the dinosaur clade Theropoda.
>>5115301>he doesn’t know what a clade is>he doesn’t know about macroalgaekek
>>5115301So you don't know phylogeny nor taxonomy nor cladistics, bravo.
>>5115248uh yeah, we are bipedal cynodonts. or are you gonna deny that?
