I mean is it gross? yeah sure, but is it THAT bad? nah.men on animals, that's bad, that's DISGUSTING. but animals on women? that's a different ballpark right there, y'know?Like, is it really that bad, seeing a woman getting ate out by a dog? I don't think so. a girl sucking a dog off? that's disgusting, sure but it isn't THAT bad. only time when it's bad is obviously when it's a rape and I know the argument, animals "can't" consent but if they mount a woman with the intention to cum, is it really that bad?
>>941175439
faggot!
>>941175523that's bad but not the worst thing i see
>>941175653>>941175550is this really that bad? I mean it's just disgusting but is it morally dubious?
>>941175926its so disgusting it circles around to being hot again
>>941175439>I know the argument, animals "can't" consentHumans are animals. Maybe you meant "beasts"? then we may have an argument. But I would say sinse they can't consent that is why it's fine to have sex with them. You know when they don't want it if they try to get away or are in distress. I don't get it. I think everyone has the ability of consent unless your're literally deaf, blind and catatonic.
>>941175439I'd say that in some case man on animal is fine too, a bitch in heat can very much he receptive to any cock, even a human's.as long as the animal isn't hurt and doesn't want to get away, why limit the moral doubt for women?
>>941176414to each their own I guess
>>941175439Objectively animals being of less than human intelligence and dependent on us for survival or continued luxury make them property. Devoid of ethics you may do with your property as you please. Beyond that it’s up to you to reason out what is right or wrong to do with them. Are they cut from a similar enough cloth that their actions may be seen as consent? Are they not anywhere near us and given their dependence on us does that impose a duty of care on an owner to provide but not take advantage?
>>941176871yeah but most of the time, it's rapey
t
>>941177582>yeah but most of the time, it's rapeyMost of us are carnivores, and therefore are fine with countless animals being killed in an industrial process to satisfy our appetites. How is having sex with an animal worse than that?
>>941179253yes, there is a reason why murder is less evil than rape
>>941179350I think that's a fairly rare opinion. Laws generally rank murder as a more serious crime.Plus, my impression is that most people who regularly practice bestiality are not rapists, but rather take good care of their pets. It's perfectly possible to get consent from dogs; they're not shy about showing their emotions. And in case of women with male dogs, the consent is fairly obvious.
>>941175439Hot to see a woman fuck a dog or farm animal, more humiliation than fucking a nigger!
>>941179510both are hot, know a couple chicks that into both.
>>941175439none of the dogs ive watched empty their balls into a human bitch looked like they were forced to do itthey all seemed quite eager to get their dicks into those wet holes
>>941179671exactly
>>941179510Yeah, it is pretty hot :)
>>941181665based
>>941182307It's not so much about the act itself, but the fact that they're actively seeking to hurt women, and they don't care about the women they're abusing, they just care about hurting them and watching them suffer
>>941182475Okay, your kink's different than mine. I do not enjoy anyone being hurt, and neither do the vast majority of zoophiles, as they are called, as far as I understand.
>>941176727>Humans are animalsNigga we fungi
>>941175439itt alanah tries to convince rahul that it's not THAT bad that she takes the knot regularly
>>941183532me too :(
