The Republican answer to poverty.
Nobody owes you free food just because you're too lazy to work for a living.
>>942117194>Nobody owes you free foodHow do you figure?
>>942116347Is SNAP the answer to poverty? Sometimes you need a swift kick in the nuts to get you on the right path rather than a hand out of some mountain dew for you and your fat fucking kids.
>>942117445Food costs to make. It should cost to eat. Easy concept.
There is a social contract. Conservatives see nothing wrong with the government being able to execute people for various reasons but if you need help with food then you need to do some humiliation ritual.
>>942117494We produce far more food than can be eaten. It makes sense that in a functioning society that it provides the absolute most basic of necessity.If there were some kind of food scarcity or we actually cut taxes by a huge margin so that citizens can give more on their own there would be a better argument to not fund simple social programs.But instead we get more taxes and they don't even provide services anymore. It's the worst option. Then they take thst tax money and give it to the ultra wealthy in the form of tax breaks or needless industrial subsidies.
>>942117453You aren't going to be better off if poor people can't eat. Instead they keep the money and even tax you more.
>>942118206This. It should not even need to be said but some people insist on being a billionaire bootlicker. Imagine defending the government that lets its own people go hungry while spending hundreds of billions on how to better spy on and kill people.These motherfuckers are one step away from saying "Let them eat cake."
>>942118206>or we actually cut taxes by a huge margin40% already don't pay anything and now we give them stuff.>But instead we get more taxes and they don't even provide services anymoreThat's how socialism works.
>>942117548>Conservatives see nothing wrong with the government being able to execute people for various reasonsWhew lad, that's some edge.
>>942118253>You aren't going to be better off if poor people can't eatWhy wouldn't I?
>>942120157Because they'll eat you and I would lead them.
>>942120044>40% already don't pay anythingThat's because they don't have anything.
>>942117453Most these people are fat as fuck and don't want to work even though they can. This country has an obesity epidemic. No one is starving. Imagine a world where responsibility is frowned upon.
>>942120189That means they are eating then.I can't think of any downside to the poor not eating.
>>942120192Why not? Are they defective? There is no way I'm going to believe that 40% of this nation is unable to earn a living.
>>942120267What the fuck are they supposed to do? Republicans have outsourced high paying jobs to India and China, hired illegal aliens for their farms and automated everything else.There is no more American middle class anymore.But why don't you tell me how tax cuts for billionaires are going to make it all better.
>>942120550Go get a job.>Republicans have outsourced high paying jobs to India and ChinaReally? Republicans sent Apple mfg to China? All the power tool companies, Republican's fault? Maybe look at the people who make regulations and wages uncompetitive.>hired illegal aliens for their farmsI thought this isn't happening. Is it happening now? You can also get a job right beside them.>and automated everything elseAutomation is a gift. People would much rather be building and maintaining machinery than actually slaving with repetitive low-value work.>There is no more American middle class anymore.Yeah there is, but they are shrinking because they're moving up.
>>942117453SNAP keeps niggers from looting grocery stores and keeps our prison populations down.
>>942120550>But why don't you tell me how tax cuts for billionairesI don't know why this is such the talking point. You mean Trump's tax cuts that favored the poor the most? Also, the top are the ones who move the economy. The poor don't contribute or contribute very little. What we should be doing is taxing the poor the highest to incentivize upward growth like they do in Sweden.
>>942120790They used to actually work, buy nice homes, and have intact families. Then he left gave them gibs until they became non-self sufficient.
>>942120881it's because the CIA gave them crack and the Jews gave them gangsta rap music.
>>942117445Nothing that requires the labor of other people is a human right. You are saying others need to work for free so you can have the fruit of their labor.
>>942120914No, it's because a single mother gets more money than if she were married and they build these state-run "low income housing" units that are rent-controlled ghettos that keeps them immobile, plus people don't take care of things that were given to them so they go to shit.
>>942120790>SNAP keeps niggers from stealing iphones and hygiene products that immediately get fencedSNAP doesn't do shit but waste tax dollars. It's $180/month. If you can't scrape that together yourself, you have much bigger problems and should be labeled an unfit parent.
>>942117445What else do other people owe you?
>>942118206In the words of William S Boroughs:"Don't you know that this is America and we would charge you for the air that you breathe if we could, and we would let thousands die of suffocation from lack of ability to pay? And if you don't believe it, look at your water bill."
>>942120790>and yet niggers keep looting grocery stores and every prison is overpopulated
>>942121481Water isn't free. It costs a lot to purify and plumb to your house. Only a commie fahgot thinks things which cost others money and resources should be free.
>>942121481You're free to go down to the river, collect your own water, bring it home, and filter and sterilize it.What a stupid take.
>>942120790Hasn't been working well, has it?
>>942121481>look at your water bill>electricity to run my well
>>942121518Could be worse. >>942122324wtf was Coors light not good enough for Tyrone?
>>942116347Thats a really good answer , actually
>>942117445Are you serious?
>>942119706How many billionaires do you think there are? Lol
>>942116347I vote Republican every year and I get SNAP benefits. I'm a professional tard wrangler and I take care of a couple of retards for SSIbux. They'll never be normal, and will never not need assistance. It sucks. I'd rather be working a real job. I'll never vote Democrat though because the DNC went from being a pro-America party to looting the government every time one of their faggots is in office.
>>942116347get a job nigger
>>942122497Walter E. Williams has talked about how being poor used to be embarrassing back in the 50s. If someone was begging, they felt ashamed and would try to actually pay you back or provide some work to repay you. Nobody talked about it because it meant you were a failure, and if you were begging, it was for a damn good reason.I remember even in the 80s and 90s, people would try to hide that they were using food stamps. Then they started this "there's no shame" campaign. Then they came out with cards that look and work just like debit cards so no one would know.And now we have people who not only brag about using EBT/SNAP, but brag about how much they stole because those items weren't covered.
>>942119706I'm gonna let you in on a secret. The DNC puts billionaires first. They got a special little list that consists of prominent billionaires who dump cash into their re-election campaigns every year. You've never had grassroots funding, and the DNC only cares about the opinions of Tom Steyer, Michael Bloomberg, Bill/Melinda Gates, George/Alex Soros, Sussmann, Hastings, and the Reeds.
>>942122773This. The DNC are fully ingrained with the globohomo.
>>942121146They really only get 180 a month? People are eating the cheapest goyslop if they make 180 dollars of food last for a month
>>942122986The trick is to have like 4 kids, then you can stretch $1000 a month which is a whole lot easier than trying to make one recipe last 3 days.
>>942122986That's the average one person gets. Actually $187.The S in SNAP stands for Supplemental. It's not supposed to be the full meal ticket, although that's what it's turned into.Actual Justice Warrior actually did the SNAP challenge for a month and ate pretty well, but it took some planning. But if you could plan you wouldn't need SNAP because you spent all your cash on a new whip and daily starbucks.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5mpVVDUalcI've been watching Caleb Hammer lately and I think every guest he's had on has been on a welfare program and it's either because they don't want to work or they have debt up the ass because they keep buying useless shit. This is where your tax dollars are going.https://www.youtube.com/@CalebHammer
>>942122986>eating the cheapest goyslopExcellent nutrition is actually very cheap. Buying goyslop is expensive.
>>942116347the number one item bought by people on SNAP is soda source - 2016 USDA report, “Foods Typically Purchased by SNAP Households”there’s your nuclear red pill for the day. your taxes are going to making people unhealthy as fuck and then more of your taxes go to their free medical care and then your car and health insurance premiums are bigger to make up for their accidents and healthcare. they are leeches. do you have the courage to accept the truth and hate the poor? it’s easy to hate the rich.
>>942123359As healthy as you can get relatively in the US anyway, US keeps soaking their crops in chemicals
>>942120044No that's how corrupt capitalism works. As evident by what's happening and that the US is a corrupt capitalist country.
>>942120235>I can't think of any downside to the poor not eating.You aren't familiar with history are you?
>>942124104>that's how corrupt capitalism worksNo, that's literally socialism. Ever heard the phrase, "socialism is great, until you run out of other people's money"? Paying more in taxes for fewer services is the prominent feature of socialism. Just look what's it's doing to health insurance.You might be misattributing crony capitalism, but that's also wrong as that's when the government and corporations get in bed to fuck the taxpayer, like Chrysler, AT&T, or PG&E.
>>942123283Imagine if the US stopped buying useless shit. As an anti consumerist that sounds great, but we've also built our entire economy on it so even more people would lose their jobs.
>>942124147Do you have an example?I'm not talking about something barbaric like the Irish Potato Famine, but where poor people simply refused to eat.
>>942124363How the hell is not providing any social services and increasing taxes socialism? Thats what is happening. The US is a capitalist country. Therefore not providing social services is a result of capitalist ideology and not socialism.
>>942124407Most revolutions are a result of starving the masses. It even has a saying."No society is more than three missed meals from revolution."
>>942124470>How the hell is not providing any social services and increasing taxes socialism?I don't know how to say this differently, other than that's exactly what socialism is, or at least how it always ends up.>The US is a capitalist countryThe US is semi-socialist. We have all kinds of food, housing, tax breaks, and other programs for literally anything. And you know what, they all go broke so they have to scrap the old plan and call it something else. Social security, medicaid, even regional transit in every single city, they're all broke.>not providing social services is a result of capitalist ideologyThat doesn't even pass the sniff test, anon. A capitalist thrives on providing a service, and the more you use of that service, the better. Capitalism is unable to not provide a service unless that service is deemed too expensive for the consumer, at least not without going out of business or having you lunch eaten by competition.
>>942124556>starving the massesThat's starvation by force and applied to "the masses". What we have is an almost unmeasurable amount of people who voluntarily don't want to eat.
>>942120734I'm not sure how you looked at that graph and drew the conclusion that people were moving up.
>>942124980How can you not?The percentages are of total population.There is always going to be a poor class regardless.2nd and 3rd tiers are shrinking.4th and 5th tiers are growing.Everyone but the poor are moving to wealthier classes.
>>942124705If you had some form of socialism and then stopped providing services then it is no longer socialism.Capitalism sells services. That's works fine for most except the poor. Which is why capitalism is mostly fine granted you provide some really basic social services like food.
>>942125132>then it is no longer socialismCorrect, then it becomes communism.When there's not enough to go around and not enough is produced, then force needs to be applied to the producers to make sure "they" have enough. "They" is the elites at the top, for a nation can't operate if government is broke. There's an old Soviet Russian diktat, "give what you can so they may have enough". This is of course at gunpoint.>That's works fine for most except the poorThe poor aren't being excluded by force and can benefit from those same services if they wanted to. I'm priced out of owning a Ferrari. I can really hustle and buy one though, but government should give me one anyways, right?.>granted you provide some really basic social services like foodIf you can't find your own food in a nation full of fatasses, you don't deserve it. What else should people get that's "basic"?
