File: IMG_5827.jpg (36 KB, 694x1066)

36 KB JPG

I like shos a lot

>>942784830

Anyone have more of this creation???

File: e4ee498a1acc1bd9be420aa5e(...).jpg (227 KB, 774x1200)

227 KB JPG

>>942795825
give it a rest. the answer is no

>>942795825
Even if this was generated legally (as in no IRL person was used as a reference) there's no way it stays legal with the advancements of AI.

>>942796462
It 100% used a real boy model. You can tell, especially the last few seconds

>>942797820
Yeah, the part where cum comes out of literally nowhere is a pretty obvious sign that it's 100% a real video because that's how real people cum.

File: cuteboy.png (1.81 MB, 1210x773)

1.81 MB PNG

Is there anything better than taking a smooth shota penis in your mouth, fellating it wetly, cradling the hairless scotum in your palm, and tasting him rope his thin watery salty cum down your throat? I think not.

File: sample_5ea030b6bd1a4104d0(...).jpg (79 KB, 850x688)

79 KB JPG

>>942798624

>>942797820
>>942797893
If there were more examples, perhaps we could make a more accurate assumption.

>>942798703
There's not gonna be any more examples because those are definitely real models. The anon who posted that just used the least convincing one.

File: c0932e17e1108f101d27d8ba7(...).jpg (285 KB, 800x651)

285 KB JPG

>>942799571
it does move pretty realistically. muscles are in the right spots, no deformation of the body or fabric. fingers solid.

Might be right

>>942795825
The original image was AI generated by ToxicHost on ATF. Looks like someone animated it with WAN 2.2.

I am extremely confident that no IRL people / images were used in the creation of the original image and I believe it is unlikely that non-compliant training data was used in the model used to animate the image.

>>942799837
If shit like that becomes popular and posted everywhere it's just going to blur the line between what's real and fake, and it's going to lead to more censorship.

File: 8b2cd3b77eb7b4358bb3069cc(...).jpg (190 KB, 1449x1662)

190 KB JPG

If you squeeze him he squeaks

>>942800104
ATF does not allow "realistic" images or the use of models / LoRA trained on real people.

However, just because one particular site doesn't allow it, doesn't mean it does not exist.

I can assure you that the tools necessary to create images that would get you banned from ATF exist and are being used by "less risk adverse" individuals.

There is just really no good place to post them because most sites don't allow that kinda stuff (for obvious reasons).

File: original drawn by worobor(...).jpg (408 KB, 1536x2304)

408 KB JPG

>>942800104
Everything leads to more censorship, always. AI will indubitably be used as an excuse, but it doesn't mean it's a remotely good excuse, and it sure as hell a different thing would be used anyway if AI didn't exist.
Not that it'll change anything because you won't be able to convince any brainwashed idiot, but I beg you not to fall for retarded propaganda. AI shota porn does not need that kind of "references." You sure have watched that AI video with the cats playing instruments that has been shared everywhere, did they have to use real cats playing instruments for real to make it look realistic? I'm pretty sure they did not.

Again, I have no idea how the video from the previous thread was animated, but I'm 100% sure that unless whoever did it was clinically retarded, the video didn't use any dubious "reference."