[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/b/ - Random
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766182571346457.jpg (196 KB, 1319x1021)
196 KB
196 KB JPG
>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-disclosures
I really don't get it, this board has much more messed up stuff than what's here.
>>
>>943843841
hee hee
>>
>>943843841
they are not releasing everything because it would incriminate standing members of the government who have to sign off on releasing everything.

Welcome to politics.
>>
File: Zm11DAzY.png (668 KB, 1264x892)
668 KB
668 KB PNG
>>943846822
They're not releasing everything because they're not done censoring it yet. Like look at these suit wearing "victims" who were clearly trafficked children that need their identity protected.
>>
trump signed the law knowing he would just break it

he cant get punished, but those who listen to him can, and he doesnt care
>>
>>943847452
They're not just censoring stuff, they're deciding what is in the data cache that they release to begin with.

There are ALWAYS some carve outs for plausible deniability that benefit the government because literally the government writes the laws. There is bound to say some clause somewhere that says something like "If this could lead to the harm of living people", or "If this affects national security", or "If this jeopardizes existing operations run by the Intelligence agencies", or "If this information is deemed relevant by a court martial" or whatever.

This is why the documents are released in batches over the years - and some 'batches' are fake because they are previous batches with different combinations of redactions.

The ultimate rule at play here is probably "Nothing will be released to incriminate living individuals in the deep state".
>>
>>943847452
At this point, what they’re doing should be just as damaging to their reputations as releasing information that implicates them in criminal activity.

Trump and other wealthy sleazeballs fucked Epstein's sex slaves - period - and anyone with half a brain knows it.
>>
>>943843841

who is janet jacking off here?
>>
File: epsteinfiles.jpg (55 KB, 720x405)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>943843841
it's what is not in there that I'm curious about
>>
>>943843841
Sorry Dianna
>>
File: doj distraction.jpg (166 KB, 850x1112)
166 KB
166 KB JPG
>>943843841
yeah thats not even epstein files related.
the department of injustice is trying to pull fast ones.
this entire administration is nothing but gaslighting and lies.
>>
>>943843841
>thinking that people in power will actually reveal what they’ve been up to
Lol
Lmao even
>>
>>943857205
how fucking stupid is this the 2nd pic is shopped as hell and you can reverse search and see its not on getty images and there no record of three being together before this pic was revealed
>>
File: IMG_20251220_113745.jpg (1.2 MB, 2856x1687)
1.2 MB
1.2 MB JPG
They forgot to redact victim butt
>>
>>943857393
Are you stupid or pretending? For what purpose? The photo has been on the internet since 2002.
>https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/singer-songwriter-michael-jackson-his-children-children-news-photo/102505979
>>
>>943857644
allright i stand corrected thank for the link
>>
>>943857205
there not the same image for sure but every close like taken seconds apart
>>
>>943857205
ok lets work this out the epsiten files go back like 20 years so we know where the other pic was taken ?
without that what makes you think both pics are not connected to the epstien filed and we just didnt know it tell now ?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.