If kids can consent to being a tranny, why can't they consent to suck my cock?
They can in normal countries. For example in Poland age of consent is 15.
>>944111664Get ready for even more prudishness.Many people are still buying the myth that "kids don't fully develop their brains until 25". Notice how they are calling 25 years old "kids" on Reddit, Medium, citing and cherry picking wrong Research Gate articles. Times when you are being pedo for hitting on 24 years old as someone over 30 is coming already.It's better to have your own moral standards. No rape, no lies, no coercion. But if you happen to find some 11+ who wants to suck your dick go for it. Just don't get caught but again, no rape, coercion or lies.
>>944112578Also, Hollywood and music industry don't seem to have issues employing not even teens or early teens but young kids. This is clearly wrong because around that age it's true their brains are underdeveloped. They can't consent. Yet they are employed?While we get upset for someone fucking a 14 years old?
>>944112675Idk anon... working is no where near as bad as getting fucked by an old wrinkley dude.
>>944112771IDK anon... I would take a 25yo woman fucking me when I was 14 over working.
>>944112771Some of them like that. I wouldn't say wrinkly but 30-50 men can trigger attraction in young girls. It happens all the time. If they want to.Again no coercion, lies or abuse (human trafficking, rape).Hollywood meanwhile can be ruthless to even employ literal children with underdeveloped brains.
>>944112917and I'm saying this as a man who prefer women between 40 and 55. Young girls can have awful higiene and can be really annoying. But I still believe people are so prudish about something like sex while literal children are allowed to change sex, work or play violent games.
>>944111664That only applies to straight men. Gays and women will still be allowed to.
>>944113145not true, check the case of Rebecca Joynes, going to jail for fucking 14 years old. She even got pregnant.They say she coerced them and threatened them. If true fair enough but maybe the 14 years olds simply regret it or want some cash. I don't know, I don't want to be unfair maybe she really was a bad woman.But point is there is no distinction to be fair. And I hate women as much as anyone elses here
>>944112578AI really skews the line
>>944112578„She was only 33 years old you sick bastard! That’s a child!“
>>944111664>If kids can consent to being a tranny, why can't they consent to suck my cock?its not socially acceptable yet. give it like 10 years
>>944112917I agree. Consensual hebe is just fine. The societal laws change but the truth remains the same.
Kill yourselvez.
>>944113845u first
>>944111664logfat
>>944111664Consent is not a single thing for all situations. So a kid wants you to hold therm they put their arms out for you. Are they consenting to being held? Obviously. They're asking you to pick them up and hold them.So clearly the concept of consenting to affection is not only possible for kids, it's natural and normal.So the question of consenting to sexual activity is a legal question. It means are they smart enough to understand the activity in terms of the pros and cons & the possible issues related to it. The courts have decided that they can not consent because they don't full grasp what they are consenting to. For example, if you want to talk about penetration: at their age it would hurt. It would be painful. They don't know that. You see how they can't consent to it since they don't know what it is?However, according to this same logic there are a few sexually affectionate activities that they could consent to. These would be caressing of the skin/body massage, kissing, gentle caressing of the genitals, non penetrating oral (kissing. licking)The other issue is that of emotional hurt. Kids get emotionally attached to adults easily and so we don't want them to ever be heartbroken at that age. Being heartbroken is bad enough as a teen, young adult, but a child might become suicidal or something. So if a little one falls in love with you you must always be able to be there for them so they never feel rejected. It's all about love, affection, and care for them. Unfortunately some of you bastards would do things to them that would hurt them and you're why the rest of us can't be very affectionate with them.
>>944111664Why do they look like Taylor Swift?
>>944113429Said every 50 y/o roastie ever
Easy question. Only one of those two things is in line with an agenda that was aggressively pushed for globally. Also if people start pulling out their dicks they might be inclined to do things that increase the population. Can't have that happen in white countries unless race mixing is involved.
>>944117601But what happens when they grow up, if the older lover is exclusive to the age range? That'd be some pretty mad heartbreak too.
>>944118030When they hit the teen years, they'll lose interest in the older person and want to start to date kids their own age.The other thing is that affection is not exclusive to sexual activity. Going in the adult must understand that giving affection beyond hugs, non french kissing, and body massage requires being sensitive to their feelings longer term. If you can't commit to being there for them don't get involved. I want to point out that this is all theoretical. I'm not advocating it. I'm merely exploring the concept from an intellectual point of view.I'd also like to point out that I myself have no interest in genital touching with them. The only things I would do if it were legal and socially acceptable is body massage, body caressing/kissing, and cuddling. I am not a pedo in the common understanding of the word. I merely admit that some of them have beautiful bodies. I love their personalities as they are sweet, exuberant, and adorable. My love for them is from my heart.
