This is an important thred!
Op here.There's a hot chubby chick that works at the local dollar general
>>944205850you already tried this yesterday. fool once shame on me, fool me twice shame on YOU!
>>944205850Hi fren, hope youre having a good day
i love this froggie its so cute
>>944205985Frens
>>944206051
>>944206124Hi fren
>>944205908No
>>944206169I wan a frem
someone ask why op deems the thread important. someone try to get him to even justify with one not of evidence that is generally considered important beyond his "evidence" that "it's important because i said so". it's not an important thread. that doesn't have op can't have a thread, but he shouldn't lie to bait people into looking into a thread that is not actually important.
>>944206897See>>944205886
>>944207181changed your tactics i see. i am impressed with your ingenuity. you are truly a worthy opponent.
anyone think it's possible to use the bulletproofs inner product argument but with a collision resistant hash function as the commitment scheme for binding only arguments of knowledge? e.g. replace pederson commitments with a random lattice base where the input is multiplied by it into a Z_q^n module with q prime. The folding mechanism forms a homomorphism for algebraic operations after foldingif collision resistance isn't sufficient the construction can be lifted into an instance of the short integer solution problem to get second pre-image resistance and other good stuff
>>944205850You are liar! You only make these threads to steal Pepe’s
>>944207550my thinking is, provided a 32 bit field each fold gives 32 bits of security, so as long as there are > 8 folds it's safe. But i'd still run plenty of soundness amplification on the same oracle transcriptin practice it's pretty quick without the exponentiation overhead
>>944207550i'm still unclear on the verification complexity. Communication complexity is definitely logn, i think verification is sublinear without the hiding mechanism?? doesn't matter either way because i can use it as an IVC...
>>944207607It's twofoldI do like liberating pepes but also the dollar general girl is thick and tasty looking
>>944207825Post pic of her and I will give you rare Pepe’s
>>944207550i really don't want to lift into sis though, i'd much rather use collision resistance and run a bunch of soundness amp. Just need better analysis of the construction to determine safety and how to parameterize. Need to find some math nerds
>>944207550on collision resistance, each fold selects a random challenge element which is multiplied by a convolution of the input vector. The lattice base itself is folded with the challenge elements as well, so you'd need structured second pre-images for each fold, which should be difficult to do
>>944208242ugh the more i think about it the more i think it's not secure. I should lift into SIS the concrete cost should be close to 0 fml
>>944208242ok actually no i think it's kinda safe. There is a first multiplication of the challenge element by the accumulated input vector. Then a second multiplication of the challenged vector by the current lattice base, which is variable based on previous challenges. So finding a second pre-image for the current lattice base would require accumulated second pre-images for the previous folds ??????idk i need someone smarter than me to think about this pls
>>944208498Try using separate challenge elements for the input vector and the lattice matrix. This may break your final homomorphism though.
is something importont happening in this importont thread?
bump
>>944207890I don't have a picture do you think she'd think it's weird if I ask for one?>>944209183Yes
>>944211802>I don't have a picture do you think she'd think it's weird if I ask for one?not at all
No it snot
Do you think my chances to win on a state lottery increases or decreases if I go through a federal thing to travel borders legally?
>>944211854I could say it's for a project.I jacked off to her before. It would be nice to look at a picture while I jacked off.But i would say it's for a project.
>>944212141omg you're so lewd, yes that's fine. i'm screaming lmaoi'm not posting it here
bump, Q i feel like you're lurking. I would really appreciate input on the cryptography :(
>>944212109oh i missed this, probably no effect?
>>944213276unless it's corrupted. tracking rng in lotteries is probably a good idea
>>944211901didn't have to say this one out loud
very cool 00
>>944212349Yes you are
>>944213829i'm not posting it here at this point in time
bump i guess
>>944216348When in doubt.
>>944207550I understood most of the individual words, but the whole doesn't make much sense to me. Am I too stupid to be a fren?
noe
for the slower students...
>>944206897>>944209183This thread is important because new frenships are being made!
>>944217794haha i bet
>>944217768OK, fine, fine, but is there any porn of this?
>>944217807uh not as far as i know. please try not to spam this thread too much
>>944217807unless by porn you mean concrete implementations, in which case yes150k constraints in < 10 seconds on a regular laptop
of an r1cs over a scalar field
