prove to me that lolicon isn’t pedophilia.
>it's just pixelsThat's what they always say
>>944267578define both of those terms
>>944267578Just got done working out at the gym. Feeling absolutely pumped, like I could just beat the fuck out of a loli. I want to take these big ass dumbbells I bought and just throw them at lolis, followed by a slam dunk onto the floor. Once pinned, I want to shove my ass in their face and choke them to death with my shit going down their throat. They'll be clogged, logged, and trogged.
lolicons are into japanese cat artpedophiles are into childrenit's really that simple
>>944267578
maybe it's pedophilia but it's definitely not csam
>>944267578Prove to me that you aren't a faggot.
>>944267578Prove to me lolis don’t make my cock leak
>>944269141Remove the "maybe" and you got the correct answer.
>>944269409kek
>>944269057This might seem very profound but it is not. It's not a pipe, but it's still a depiction of a pipe.If the question was "is lolicon csam" the answer is no, because it's just drawings. But the question is "is it pedophilia" and it's obvious to everyone with two eyes that the majority of lolicon is to trigger the arousal of pedophiles.>>944268341Cute defense but this is only about facial features. In (most) anime art styles, everything except faces are rather realistic.
>>944269647The best defense I have is lead. I don't talk to people like you without it because it just isn't worth my time.
>>944269715i have a carbon fiber defense weapon, it's pretty cool
>>944269762We should meet up sometime. I have some literature on murder if you want to read with me. It's a fun hobby I have, but I'm not going to kill anyone.
>>944269715>I don't talk to people like you but let me reply to you anyway with a threat because I have no argumentYou won't do shit, keep wanking to your loli porn
>>944269836hmmm, what do you mean by literature on murder? got any good titles?
>>944270043But what if I did something by proxy and gave you credit for it?
>>944270064Anything by the paladin press collection. Also, it's fun to read the biographies of serial killers like Jeffrey Epstein and Charles Manson
>>944270167> serial killers> Jeffrey Epstein kekhmm will take a look, thanks
>>944270089If I made you leave the basement for more than 5 minutes I would deserve the credit to be honest
>>944270303Whatever, bud. I'll be fucking some fat used up prostitutes. My favorite line on the way out is "you got fucked by a pedophile." Do you have any other lines you'd like me to tell them after I fuck their brains out?
its a drawing son
This isn't gay, it's a drawing.
>>944267578If you accept some people will be attracted to drawings, but not the real 3d person, then it could be sensible to conclude that some lolicons are not pedophilic in a meaningful sense. Technically, they are. It's a similar distinction between a furfag and a white women that wants to fuck the family dog.
>>944272552But this is not the complete truth, is it? You're not attracted to drawings, you're attracted to drawings of _subject_. That _subject_ informs us of what the sexual attraction is, and what visual depiction is triggering your arousal response.
>>944272918If it makes you feel any better, I could get off to fucking your dead corpse as well
>>944272918who cares you got free access to the information of pedos by you for free available with directions to them yet you waste time online bothering dudes who just masturbate and haven't hurt anyone so far and even if they did you literally have a map to those around you stop being a pussy
>>944272918As the anon you replied to, I'm not sure how much disagreement there is between us. As I understand it, you are attracted to _subject_ as depicted. The reality may be sufficient for an arousal response, or not. But you are attracted to the idealized form. This makes you a pedophile by technicality, but not necessarily in practice to a meaningful degree. If I throw a child in front of you and you are genuinely not attracted to it, the label of pedophile becomes misleading.
