yeah, it seems like AI and blacked can't stay in their own threads. I don't have an issue with their content, but they don't need to repost the same stuff in multiple threads.
>>944736548I don't see a blacked or AI loli thread up
>>944736548problem is, we want and need a blacked loli thread but fat chance of that lasting
>>944736728>>944736762Blacked loli is for fags.Your kind should go to >>>/lgbt/
>>944736728Blacked has never had an issue in the past creating their own threads. AI has >>944732561 open atm, and it's very active. Loli being posted there doesn't need to be reposted in other threads imo.
>>944736762Just create one then. loli threads get spammed and pulled down all the time, we just create more.
>>944736858basedshittedtrannies have no place here
PENIS
>>944736343Kill yourself loli hater
There are 4 loli threads on /b/. I'm convinced this topic is THE most lurked on 4chan.
>>944741385you'd be surprised :^)
>>944741501lol surprised at what my guy? that there's more popular threads? or just how popular these ones are?
>>944741385wat? Are you telling me a majority of the population are attracted to loli but won't admit it?! noooooo......
I like to uncensor Konpeto's work. It's easy even with the most rudimentary photoshop knowledge. Is that plagiarism?
>>944741934fuck no. Art is to be shared with the public and appreciated, not locked away and owned. There's a big difference between constructive and destructive changes. Constructive are meant to accentuate the features already appreciated in the original, and should be received as positive feedback/alters. Destructive changes want to hide or destroy the originals intent and should be received negatively for the lack of appreciation for the original.Plus, the artist has the uncensored version. If they have an issue with decensoring, then they can release it uncensored themselves.
>>944742670Makes sense GIF-chan and I would tend to agree. I'm on the fence about this one, I removed the penetrative act, destroyed; but I replaced it with her body being more accentuated, constructive. Thoughts? Or maybe that one's for the philosophers...
>>944743092I don't see a negative defacement here. You are altering with a destruction, yes, but not in a way that tries to mock the art, the subject, or the artist. In general, I'm really open to art altering, though I'm not an artist myself, so maybe my opinion doesn't matter. I'm fine with anything meant as a positive alteration, even if it were drastic. For instance, if you removed her arms at the elbows, and put in chains connected to the stumps. That would be a WHOLE new direction and intent for the picture. But I'd still be ok with that as long as it wasn't overly grotesque. However, if you had her breathing fire and shooting lasers out of her eyes... I'd see no purpose to a change like that and just a distraction from the original character; a mockery.The former is more honest and good spirited, but the latter is disingenuous in how it ridicules the original.
>>944741385I made two, first one started getting spammed, which I made because the previous thread was pushed to the post limit with no image larping shit. So partially bad.>>944736728>>944736886Idk if this is a common thing because I don't go to the threads, and for all I know it's bots with a couple people actually using it. But one day there was some site spam and it was also the only loli thread up so I checked the drama. It was being spammed with logfag shit, but I've never seen them explicitly use log shit here. But I've noticed the "E" signalling post or whatever it is lately. Maybe the normal threads were being spammed too and it was a one off. I'm too lazy to check, somewhere in the archive I'm sure.Point is, there's something going on around here that's more than just country actors and interest groups. The playing field is a little more wet than usual.
>>944743868>there's something going on around here that's more than just country actors and interest groupsYou mean its actually something organic on /b/ for a change?
>>944743092Also, the fact that you care enough to ask other peoples opinions, and genuinely seem to be worried about how it will be received by others, means you're likely a good actor with pure intentions. That gives you a lot of slack in my book.
>>944743868blacked threads to get a good amount of log spam, it's true. But generally, they just start more threads and wade through it. They don't usually invade other threads. The fact that they didn't even have an active thread at the time was the weird part. Usually I see like 2-3 blacked loli threads in the catalog.
>>944744035Nah, autism has many flavors, and things are idealogically a bit shaky, so who knows what weirdo will crop out. But realisitcally as well, roughly 13% of users are probably actually black, but obviously none of the spam is black&black and is meant to sow discourse. I'm also not totally of sober mind, mind you. I doubt any of it is all that organic, but I would hate to be unfair.
>>944743778>>944744156Thank you sir I do truly intend it as a compliment to the original artist, just with my own preferred twist. That character especially has always been a favorite. I like my lolis pure, although I have no problem with them being depicted enjoying love, as they should be. Thanks for the input!
>>944744251I see. Yeah, someone is stirring the pot. I think loli/shota makes it hard to astroturf somehow. But like I've mentioned, I am not totally of sound sobriety. Maybe I am seeing more drama than there is, spicy spicy drama.
>>944736343i love ichigo mashimaro omg
>>944744156Realistically how long would the toy last before their brain pretty much shuts down in this scenario?
>>944744593It's not loli, but I recommend https://nhentai.net/g/165817/I think it does a really great job at portraying a mind break once she's pushed too far. In general, I think humans can put up with alot, but there needs to be a glimmer of hope to cling to. If that's taken away, she will mind break within a couple weeks.
>>944742670Loving these
>>944745921
>>944746515Very helpful. Thank you. Is there any way I can convince a bunch of them to come live with me?
>>944747330ofc, groom them, lick their cunnies, finger train then, fuck their buttholes and so on :3
the best lolicon imageboard is back
>>944744580Then you need to die. "People" like you who hate lolis are not human
>>944750148I miss her show.
>>944740359I wish there was more racemixing lolis. Typically the art styles do not differentiate race, or they just change the color.
>>944748379why do i hate loli?
>>944736343Do dolls like this actually exist?
My fave pic ever
>>944752876Saucenao has some lead, but idk how helpful it is. The name is a generic brand product, but a more specific search might help.
>>944736343Do they actually make figurines like this? lmfao
>>944740563I kid you not I have been pushing loli HARD ever since this man got elected and it’s only been better and better since then. MAGA normalized loli whereas it was universally hated in leftist communities or at least it finally put it into perspective how absurd the argument over art is.
>>944759178It is a 3D print made with a color sand printer. Probably personally made, but maybe the 3D files can be found.
>>944759601What's a sand printer? I've got a regular 3D printer in my basement that I just never set up.
>>944759910It prints in colored sand bound with a resin. They are very expensive so not many people have them. If you look closely at the figures, you can see the gritty texture.
>>944760070Actually, maybe its the binder that is colored and the sand is actually a powder. Anyway, it's from a colored 3D printer and they are brittle and gritty but fully colored.
