You can get banned for posting copyright content on here?! How the fuck do you know what images have infringement claims before posting them?!
I got a warning for posting a Belle Delphine picture.
>>947677944your not actually this retarded, right?
Everything is copyright. There are people that have a certificate stating they own a star and people take photos of it without permission anyway.If the stupidity of the legal system were fully enforced society as we know it would promptly collapse. Even in the so called Land of the Free that supposedly values free communication. Odds are 4chan got threatened by someone and instead of resisting the injustice made you a recent casualty of this absurd world.
>>947678084What do you mean?>>947678018I never got any warning, just got that ban within minutes of posting like 10 totally different images which makes it impossible to know which one triggered it.
>>947678347Most censorship is motivated by the desire to dominate others or profit. So ask yourself which image you posted most seems to oppose that goal.Look at the money. See what image is most tied to money. Ethots, the favorite ip of a mega company, a recently released piece of media, and so on.
>>947677944Piracy. It's a crime. You wouldn't steal a car.
>>947678334>f the stupidity of the legal system were fully enforced society as we know it would promptly collapseImagine when automation is in place to fully regulate all human actions through monitoring and retribution.Even your thoughts are scheduled to be monitored, and punished.
>>947677944why did you black out the dates? you think that will dox you? retard.
you probably posted something that someone else doesn't want to be uploaded, like an OF model not wanting her nudes shared unless it's paid for, and they keep issuing takedown notices. So the mods just ban people who post them so they get the message not to post again in the future.
>>947678701No bully...
>>947678347Of what did you post?
>>947677944Yeah, this started happening after The Fappening. Luckily Dana White doesn't know about Röökijäbä
>>947678701Bro, you never know what goes one behind the scenes, there's bans that happen daily and narrowing it down might invite retribution just for making this thread.
>>947678740Sure but this happened like within minutes, heavily implying some kind of auto monitoring/recognition system. Unless someone happened to notice and report it that fast.
>>947679082maybe, or the mod was online and happened to see your post as soon as you made it and banned you on the spot. Ive made threads that got deleted within 30 seconds and me being banned before too.
>>947678084>your
>>947677944yes, u can and since a long while, u cringy celeb poster How do u know if the medium is copyrighted? Everything is, by default.
>>947679274that's a stupid takewhat if I'm posting my oc, it has copyright as you say but so fucking whatyou got the mentality of a slave btw
>>947677944Just don't post. Problem solved
>>947679354yes. Its copyrighted to u. U stupid, cringe fuck.
>>947677944you can get banned for anythingi would note that according to the image you posted, you were not banned for posting copyright content
>>947678654Oh I do. You know its coming too. More than that there will be forged evidence and people that make the rules getting off free just like always.
>>947678867Various individual pics of nude models from various studios on the /s board. All of them from rather old sets. All pics from more than 10 years ago.
>>947678607I would download it.
>>947680331Someone / a bot likely saw the studio logo, treated it akin to branded merchandise, and gave you the boot.
>>947677944So we just have to copyright all the logposting images to get that fucker to stop?
>>947680475under modern copyright laws in most jurisdictions, they were under copyright the moment they were placed in a fixed formthe original photo of Andy Sixx that's the basis of a lot of the log images was under copyright as soon as it was created, though whether Biersack or his label or the photographer who took the photo owns the copyright depends on the detailslog images that don't use that photo or another work under copyright belong to whomever created them in MS Paint or whateverworks that use copyrighted material (like the Andy photo) may or may not be fair use under copyright law and may or may not be copyrightable in themselves; i believe parodies can have their own copyright, for example, assuming they're sufficiently transformativetl;dr if you want to copyright logposting images, you're going to have to create them yourself
>>947680475Its likely deemed an artistic parody. So unless you are claiming you made the images they post...
>>947680397kekThey think we wouldn't.But we would.
>>947678334>Everything is copyright.This guy knows what he's talking about. Copyright exists in any original idea converted to a permanent form, be it an image, piece of music, video or painting, if you created it and permanently recorded it then you automatically own the copyright in it. Uploading a music video to youtube and putting "I do not own this, no copyright infringement intended" counts for absolutely fuck all. If you didn't make it then you can't make copies of it, heance "copy right" , the right to make copies.
>>947677944The log fag needs to be banned even though he isn't copyrighted
>>947679082I've been auto banned for an image before it's literally instant the second you hit post. They check the checksum on the file to a list of stuff they dont want posted.
