Does life imitate art, or does art imitate life
>>23928903>I'll cosplay your favourite v-tuber!
No. You will NOT find a jack the ripper (female Neet edition) gf. It's the later btw because life came before art, so art has to imitate life( I think)
>>23928921After that logic its totally plausible to get obsessed stinky neet gf with messy hair? No?
>>23928932sure
both and neither
life is art and art is life
>>23928903both to an extent; it's an ongoing feedback cyclebut life initially initiated art, whereas art only initially imitated life, thus genealogical analysis would suggest that art is ultimately in imitation of life, whereas the reverse couldn't possible true, owing to the period where there was life but no artlife may imitate art, but not inherently soart necessarily imitates life—there is no art which is not inspired by experience of reality
>>23928903life cant imatate or do anything, its just a name we put on a complex ecosystem of processes that we dont fully understand. art however can.>>23929042art can be literally anything, is a perspective you put on something. its just like empathy, time or our consciousness >>23929050faggot you didnt respond to me in the last thread because you are an autistic fuck who lostLOSER hahahahha
>>23929158>faggot you didnt respond to me in the last thread because you are an autistic fuck who lostwhich one were you?
>>23929158were you the one who said you were a retard?I don't remember what your argument was though
>>23929178must be nice having selective memory, but it does not matter. you stopped responding due to losing, its not like you left either since you were responding to the others with weaker points.so what programing do you do faggot?
>>23929158the American didn't understand what psychology was—he thought there was no distinction between psychology and philosophy, and was also getting confused between Jungian and Freudian analysisbut he never actually addressed my argumentthe Indian never really made a coherent argument IIRC, he was just asking everyone if they wanted to fuckbut what was your thing?oh, that's right—you said the action of conducting an idiot cull was unempathic, but also that no action had anything whatsoever to do with empathyobviously that didn't make sense—you undermined your own argument—and you realised your error and refused to argue in good faithI consider that a win on my part, but you can cope all you like
>>23929184wait so in your mind, you won because I didn't answer "what programming do you do"?that's patheticthat's not a win
>>23929187no you didnt answer other questions as well, i forgot what the actual last post you ignored was.but look again you cant answer the question so you get defensive and deflect.>that's not a winby your logic it is, you kept saying since I wouldnt link to a post you ignored you won,
>>23929189>i forgot what the actual last post you ignored was.must be nice having a selective memory>you kept saying since I wouldnt link to a post you ignored you wonit's logically impossible to argue that the action of conducting an idiot cull is unempathic, if you also insist that no action has anything whatsoever to do with empathyI don't think you can understand why though
>>23929191>little bro cant answer the questionwhat programing do you do little buddy
>>23929195can you understand why you can't be correct, or not?then I'll answer personal questions unrelated to what we were discussing
>>23929197>little bro cant answer the questionwhat programing do you do little buddy
>>23929256>can you understand why you can't be correct, or not?>then I'll answer personal questions unrelated to what we were discussing
>>23929258>unrelated to what we were discussinghow it it unrelated when it was in my first post? you are just deflecting again because you cant answer lmao
>>23929261>can you understand why you can't be correct, or not?>then I'll answer personal questions unrelated to what we were discussing
>>23929656well thats enough proof for everyone in this thread to see how retarded you are :) thanks little guy
>>23929658look I'm happy to talk about programming with you, and answer any personal questions (within reason)but first let's just end the previous discussion:can you understand why you can't be correct, or not?
>>23929659>look I'm happy to talk about programming with youif you were you would be able to answer the question rather than deflect, its not like I asked this after you as it was in my first post on this thread
>>23929661it's just it seems irrelevant when we're discussing the action of undertaking an idiot cull, and your position is that that's unempathic, but then you also insist on a definition for 'empathy' whereby "no action has anything to do with empathy"do you see how that logically contradicts?
>>23928903i look like this and do this and say this
a fake girl failure lover drew that. her hair isnt greasy and she doesnt have a chubby tummy or self harm scars anyone who goons to this shit is a poserrrr, this is way more accurate dont ask me how i know
>>23929667she's not hairy or sweaty enough for my tastes
>>23929668(girl in the OP I mean)
>>23929664>logically contradicts>look I'm happy to talk about programming with you>doesnt post what he programs?
>>23929670YOU GET IT a real girl failure would have armpit hair full bush and 3 day old sweat stains this is like when guys say they like goth girls but they just like girls with dark hair and black lipstick but worse
>>23929672>logically contradicts>?do you not understand what a logical contradiction is?it's quite fundamental, and I don't really think the onus is on me to have to explain it to you, but I feel like I should try:it's like you're defining apples by saying "apples can't be orange" but then you're also saying that this orange fruit is an appleif we accept your definition of 'apple', then we can't also accept your appraisal of the orange fruitbecause it contradicts the definitionso when you define empathy by saying "actions have nothing whatsoever to do with empathy", if we accept that—and we do for the sake of your argument—you can't then also say "this action is unempathic"because it contradicts your definitiondoes that convey what I mean?do you see how that 'logically contradicts'?
>>23929676>puts this much effort into not answering the question
>>23929676YOOOO ARE YOU THAT FUCKER THAT WAS UNDER MY EMBARRASSING FETISH POST THAT ENDED UP MAKING 80+ REPLIES BECAUSE MY BF SAID UR RETARDED FOR ARMCHAIR PSYCHOLOGY? LMAOOOOO THAT JEET WAS RIGHT YOU ARE HERE EVERY DAY HAHAHA
>>23929678I did put effort inyou've obviously not been taught how to think critically, so I sincerely feel I owe it to you to take the time to explainif you CAN see the issue, but feel like admitting it now would be losing face, that's okay tooat this point I'm not trying to make you lose face—it's more important to me that you see the mistake, rather than who "won" yesterdayI think I was too focused on winning, and not considering the person I was talking to
>>23929682yeah its that retard lmao
>>23929682you're here too
>>23929691>no youvery smart comment anon, much intelligences>still cant answer the question
>>23929682desu this guy manages to ruin every thread that he posts inhe clearly wants people to think he's intelligent but if he had more than 2 brain cells he would have stopped posting in this thread hours ago
>>23929691i dont spend 8 hours a day here just to argue with people tho lmao. it gets to a point where it doesnt matter if you're right or wrong in these "debates" youre still wasting your days arguing on 4chan and derailing posts and making everyone find you fucking annoying as shit. if thats worth it to you then you have a sad life. anyways stop being annoying, look, hot girls>>23929696fucking right LMAO
>>23929692it's not "no you", it's "but you also"and if this is a face-saving thing, I think you're being silly—we're anonymousin the interest of good-faith discussion, I'd just like some acknowledgement that we're in agreement, then we can move on and talk about programming all you like—paradigms, patterns, the merits of different compilers, IDEs, whatever you like
>>23929700>defending 'no you'>still cant answer questionslooks like you lost again little guy, its nice to see you are still trying :)
>>23929699I enjoy it—I think being able to debate retards is a useful skill in this world—and whether you think that's sad or not is of no concern of minethe fact you criticise me and not the people who are arguing against me just as much tells me all I need to know
>>23929703theyre retarded too. ur all retarded. ive never said this to a man before but can you start just thinking with ur dick like everyone else instead of trying to be the smartest person in a fucking 4chan gooner thread
>>23929702should I just take it that you're saving face at this point?you don't value truth, you don't value honesty, and I can't make youbut debating in good faith is what a White man would do
>>23929703>the fact you criticise me and not the people who are arguing against me just as much tells me all I need to knowWAHHH why dont you HELP ME, IM THE SMART ONE NOT ANYONE ELSE!!!!
>>23929704well then criticise them toountil you do, I can't really accept what you're saying as meaningfulyou have a clear bias
>>23929705>still cant answer the question
>>23929711I offered you my termsit's up to you
>>23929712>still cant answer the question
>>23929715no, not until the first discussion is over and you see the logical error you madethose are my terms
Both are just mirrors of the man in the middle
>>23929716>still cant answer the question
>>23929720you can post it all you like, it won't change anythingyou're like a toddler trying to get their wayI've said: not until the first discussion is over and you see the logical error you madeend it, and we can talk shop
>>23929721sounds like you cant answer the question :) makes me think you might not have a wife either :0why would someone on the internet lie like this
>>23929722we're not doing that until you finish the previous discussionI'm not going to fall for such retarded bait—normie emotive arguments don't work on spergscan you see the logical error or should I keep trying to explain it?
>>23929722you mean that wife that was toootally feeling him up while he was arguing under my post totally owning the tards during his morning debate session before his epic coding job (even though he proceeded to argue for 10 more hours after that). that real life actual wife he definitely has?
>>23929725>strangers on the internet agree I'm not marriednot sure what effect this is supposed to haveas an argument it HEAVILY hinges on me not being, so it did nothing but make you look aloneas if you think being married is something unusual and rare
>>23929724>still cant answer the question. its funny that say you want to have a discussion and are so smart but yet you let something as simple as this be a barrier. doesnt sound intelligent to me>>23929725hahah yeah forgot about the feeling up part, bet she got all hot and bothered over him owning losers online and after he was done she stood up and clapped
>>23929728>doesnt sound intelligent to methat's fine—you keep trying with the emotive arguments, and I wonder to myself when you're going to get it (or indeed, if)
>>23929728dude i bet his iq is like 180 confirmed by a totally legit iq test that he found online. we're literally talking to a modern day einstein rn im so honoured to be worthy of his debate skills
>>23929734this is called triangulationit's always interesting to watch, and it tells me a lot about the kind of person you areit's an inherently-female social strategy, but narcissists also use it (often to devastating effect, they're better at it than what you're doing)unfortunately, for it to work as a weapon, it relies on me caring what the both of you think, but I really don'tit only works on people like youif you wanted to wound me, you would have to out-think me, earn my respect, and THEN use emotional weapons once I care what you think
>>23929738im not talking to you idk if u could tell but i was actually talking to the Australian guy. im making jokes at your expense to make myself laugh. i dont care if i hurt your feelings
>>23929729>still not answering the question>>23929738>this is called triangulationits like you just learnt about this and need to show off that you know a word you think is intelligent lmao>>23929734people would usually pay millions for such an opportunity and hes giving it to us for freeshould we be sucking his cock right now? thats if he graces us with such opportunity?
>>23929742no no obviously thats for his wife who is probably also a supermodel to do while he flexes his giant iq on us
>>23929744bummer :/ do you think he answers her questions or is that beneath him?
>>23929741>im not talking to you idk if u could tell but i was actually talking to the Australian guyyes, I could tellyou're triangulating against me with him—and it doesn't make you look like a good person, anonit's something that's mainly used by abusersI think you should reflect on why it is you're attempting to hurt me—because I know whybut this is an open forum, and I can reply to whomever I like>>23929742I'm not going to back down on this onewe're not discussing programming until we finish the previous discussionit's very simple: you say "you know what I can see the error", that's the end of it, and only THEN will I talk to you about programmingyou don't seem that eager to talk about it, truth be told, or you'd just quickly finish the first discussion
>>23929749you cant answer the question :)
>>23929748dont be silly obviously she only speaks when spoken to like a good respectful wife to such a hunk of a man>>23929749sorry for abusing you are you mad at me? :(
>>23929753>basic reverse psychology over and overdoes this normally work for you or something?
>>23929754>sorry for abusing you are you mad at me? :(no, not at all anonI think it's been used on you in the past and it hurt you—that's where you learnt it from, and why you're trying to hurt me with itI know you'll read this as sarcastic, but I promise it's not: I really feel bad for you, and I don't like the fact that you carry hurt around with you
>>23929761armchair psychologyyyyy.....
>>23929755>reverse psychologyyou cant answer the question :)>>23929754man im starting to feel bad for his autistic ass, look at the response he gave you.I usually try and bully the cunts on ftg but even they are smarter than this idiot and ignore me half the time
>>23929762OHH AD HOMINEM, im telling mum
>>23929763my turn to armchair psychology, i genuinely wonder if its some sort of compulsion he has. imagine the torture you must go through if every day your brain forces you to engage with ragebaiters on 4chan that just make you look pathetic. i hope he gets therapy or like. one friend>>23929764SHIT now he's won this debate and he looks like a total badass...
>>23929762in this case it is, you're absolutely rightbut it's pretty basic pattern that's widely accepted when it comes to people using abusive tactics like triangulationit comes from a cycle of abuse, and I really, honestly do hate that someone did that to you and that it hurt youI hope you can accept that I'm being fully sincere here, I'm not joking, or trying to hurt you, or anything like thatjust one human to another: I hate that that was done to you
>>23929770he doesnt need to win to look like a bad ass, just like Steven Seagal.holy shit are we speaking with Steven Seagal?>>23929772>triangulation>MUM LOOK I SAID THE WORK AGAIN :D am i your smart little boy or what :)still cant answer the question
>>23929764if we're not in a debate or discussion context, then it's not ad hominem, just criticismit's only ad hom when you criticise the person to avoid having to respond to their argument
>>23929778>still cant answer the questionno, I refuse to, until we settle the debate about whether actions can be called unempathic, when we use your definition of empathy as 'something which has nothing to do with actions'you literally cannot admit defeat, and I'm really fascinated by that
>>23929772okay ill bite. this is ur issue dude. i believe you. i fully believe that right now you are trying to be sincere. but its incredibly condescending. ultimately whatever abuse ive gone through is irrelevant, and probably applies to most people on this site because no one with a healthy brain willingly comes on here. you are not smarter than everyone else, you are some guy just like everyone else is just some guy. you arent winning debates here. you are getting mocked. whether or not it hurts you doesnt matter, you're feeding into it and calling it a "skill". in every reply ive seen from you you have acted condescending and demeaning and somehow still extremely oblivious. people dont like you because of it. which you dont have to care about. but if you dont care about how people feel about you then why are you constantly "debating" people. this isnt building some skill because these are not debates. its mentally ill people on an anonymous website doing their best to either get under your skin or amuse themselves. you are wasting your time whether you realise it or not. this is not improving your brain or your life in any way. go join some actual debate club if you care about that.anyways am i still triangling you or whatever the fuck lmao
hey guys remember when this thread was about bpd girl gooner art
>>23929783>I refuse toyou cant answer the question :)>>23929787dont be gross tammy
>>23929778lets stand in a triangle formation where you two make out sloppy yaoi style and i get to watch thats the only triangulation im down for
>>23929786well, I didn't mean to condescend to you, and I apologiseI just recognise exactly what you're doing, and what it unfortunately tells me about you, and that makes me feel sad for youthat's all it isit wasn't meant to belittle you—just express how I feel>you are not smarter than everyone elseI don't think I amI know I'm smarter than some, not as smart as others, but I am confident in my intellect, and there's nothing wrong with thatI don't like idiots, just like idiots don't like intelligent people, and there's nothing wrong with that either>this isnt building some skill because these are not debatesno, 'debates' is too generous, you're rightI actually frame it as playing pigeon chess—I think playing pigeon chess with idiots is a useful skill to havelook at how your triangulation didn't effect me at all, because I've been exposed to it more times than I can countthat's the skill; it helps me build up my armour against people like you, which I find useful out there in the real worldyou don't have to understand that, but please at least accept that I get something I feel is valuable from itI know that you two think you're having a laugh at my expense—that's not hard to understandbut you're nasty about it, and you pretty much only use normie debate strategy (emotive arguments, manipulative strategies, crude insults), and that's why you're useful to mebecause you're so unlike the people I choose to surround myself with
>>23929802second thread of not being able to answer or even address my questions, erm kinda cring ngl
>>23929802so no yaoi?
>>23929806but I have addressed your question:not until you finish the first discussion by admitting you made a logical erroryour ego won't let you do it, and I'd like to keep probing thatwhat happens when you admit it?
>>23929813thats not answering the question is it? what do you program
>>23929819it's 'addressing it', like you erroneously claimed I didn't doI have addressed your questionnow can you admit you made a logical error or will you ignore this to protect your ego and keep going on about programming as a cope?
>>23929823addressing isnt answering the question dumb dumb
>>23929824you said:>second thread of not being able to answer or even address my questionsit's the second part I'm addressing; I have addressed your question, and my addressal explains why I'm not willing to move on to discussing programming until we're done with the first point of contentionI think I've been very clear in pointing out your logical error—I've even explained what a logical error is when you indicated you didn't understand what that meantbut you can't admit that you see it too, because that would mean you lost our debate yesterday, and I don't think your ego will allow you to do thatif can accept you see the logical error, then I'll answer your programming questions, but not until thenthat IS my answer
>>23929825this is a lot of effort to just not answer the question, what do you have to hide anon?
>>23929829that is an answer to the question, it's just not the answer you want
>>23929831its more addresing the question rather than answering it, you know why[spoiler]you cant answer the question[/spoiler]
>>23929837addressing a question and explaining why I'm choosing for now not to provide you with the information you're asking for is still answering the question, anonand I do know why I'm refusing to give it to you: because you're totally unable to take the hit to your ego by acknowledging the logical error you madethat's all you have to do, and it's over, and we can talk at length about programmingI'll even give you my opinion on OOP, and the paradigm I think is superior—or we could talk about when we finally think C++ Modules are going to be usablewe can talk dirty about bit fiddling, packing volumetric data, double-ended queues, compression algorithms, and when Bogosort is actually the best sortjust admit you can see the logical error
>>23929848>still answering the questionno addressing and answering the question is not the same, i wouldnt expect a retard to understand this but just know they are different>I'll even give you my opinion on OOP, and the paradigm I think is superior—or we could talk about when we finally think C++ Modules are going to be usable>we can talk dirty about bit fiddling, packing volumetric data, double-ended queues, compression algorithms, and when Bogosort is actually the best sort>just admit you can see the logical errorthat still wouldnt answer what you program and sounds like something you got from chat gpt.Im wondering if all this is just you using a chatbot lmao
>>23929850>no addressing and answering the question is not the sameone can answer a question without supplying the information requested"no" is also an answer, after alldo you see how that works?>that still wouldnt answer what you program and sounds like something you got from chat gpt.does it sound that way to you?that's funny—I was trying to think of things that sounded vaguely rude
>>23929850>>23929852for the second "talk dirty" part, I mean—I'm deadly serious about OOP and fucking Modules when
>>23929852its still not answering the question, what do you program>does it sound that way to you?>that's funny—I was trying to think of things that sounded vaguely rudeyeah it sounds like retarded slop that someone with vague knowledge would spout out after a quick google of the subject.doesnt surprise me since you cant answer the question
>>23929848your next post will be about the advantages of composition over inheritance
>>23928903Art and life imitates ideals.
>>23929857https://archive.palanq.win/bant/thread/23888228/#q23888602now can you see the logical error you made which caused you to lose the argument yesterday?then we can talk programming
>>23929862still doesnt answer the question
>>23929863I think it goes some way to refuting the inference you're making by asking the question—i.e. that I don't know the difference between GCC and ECCI've answered your question, but I'm happy to talk about what you want, when you first acknowledge the logical error you made, but not until thenI'm curious what happens when I keep getting you to deny reality—will you just keep doing it forever?if you admitted you lost yesterday, what would happen to you?(these aren't rhetorical questions)
>>23929868I wont answer that until the first discussion is over and you see the logical error you made.what do you program
>>23929860you think that's retarded?
>>23929869sorry, but that wasn't the first discussion, and the posts prove ityou said the action of conducting an idiot cull was unempathic, but also that no action had anything whatsoever to do with empathyobviously that didn't make sense—you undermined your own argument—and you realised your error and refused to argue in good faith, and starting asking me about programming as a deflectionjust admit you made an error and we can talk about whatever you like, but I'm not prepared to answer arbitrary questions designed to deflect until that point
>>23929871>but that wasn't the first discussionyesterdays discussion ended when you stopped responding to me but kept responding to others.what do you program
>>23929876yesterday's discussion ended when you realised the error of your argument, and bizarrely tried to pivot to asking me about programming to deflect from thatyou stopped trying to defend your position, and thus lost the argumentto a spergwho was 1v3ing two other people at the same timehow embarrassing for youwhat a blow to your ego that must've beenyou're still mad about it today
>>23929879>making things up>setting arbitrary goal posts>blaming me for things i have no control of>ad hominemI think youre the one getting mad since you are devolving to this.also you didnt answer the questions, what do you program
>>23929883don't know about any of thatbut you lost hard to a fucking autist, and you're not even big enough of a man to admit it and move onso you made a little logical error? so what—you don't think I do that all the time?do you think I'd gloat, or would I respect your intellectual integrity and desire for truth?we could be talking about why Lua is superior to Python and should be more popular right now, but you just can't let yesterday gosadthis is why we need to cull idiots
People identify with fictional characters (art) as much as they do with historical ones (life). Often, as of recent times, they identify more with knowingly fictional characters. Just look at all the people here who identify with Chinese cartoon characters.In the past identity was often tied to pseudo-mythic, or idealized characters. Ragnar Lodbrok, Charlemagne, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.Fiction often impacts the individual harder than reality if they think in simple and immediate terms. Popular fictional characters are fairly easy to understand. To understand a historical figure, you need to understand their entire life relative to the context of the wider world at the time Like I said. The two mirrors reflect the man in the middle. Sometimes that man gazes into art and sees himself. Sometimes he looks into life and sees himself.The common denominator s the man, who can impact art and life as much as art and life can impact him.
>>23929892hahaha look at you devolving into name calling, wishing that i was dead etc. you are 100% angryyeah I dont think winners need to keep announcing that they have won every 2 seconds lmaoall because you cant answer questions, sad>this is why we need to cull idiots0800 689 5652, this number should help you, sorry you feel this way
>>23929897I forgot to mention those pseudo-mythic characters are a cross-form of life and fiction. But it's generally the unconfirmed parts of the mythos that are the most impactful with people.
>>23929898I wished you were dead from the beginningdo you not remember I was arguing the merits of an idiot cull?
>>23929900it wasnt from the beginning, but you have a selective memory so ill remind you that our initial conversation was about the english language which you also ignored like the questions in this thread
>>23929897I really like your perspective, and the fact you expounded on your earlier, more cryptic postI agree with your premise, but to me it still invites the prospect of art influencing life and vice versa via man as the medium of transmission, even if man's art and his perception of life are ultimately just reflections of himselfbecause what you're saying doesn't seem to preclude the terms of the original set of questions—it doesn't seem to serve as an answer to themwhat are your thoughts?
>>23929906oh, when you were arguing that if I cared about communication, I wouldn't be communicating in English on an English-speaking website(what a bizarre thing to have said)I remember nowno, an idiot cull has been my perspective for far longer than our exchange yesterdayI wished you were dead from the beginning
>>23929928still not answering the question>an idiot cull has been my perspective for far longer than our exchange yesterday0800 689 5652, call this number it will help you with your thoughts>I wished you were dead from the beginning>you know someone from posting let alone one postactual retard behavior lmaosounds like you calm down a little bit however, thats nice.
>>23929935I'm kind of bored with running circles around you I guess, but I was always calmthat's crazy—did you have a little version of me in your head that was becoming irate? unfortunately not, I'm afraidyou must've thought you were doing so well
>>23929941>I'm kind of bored with running circles around you I guessso youre going to lose again? shame, all you had to do was answer a simple question>did you have a little version of me in your head that was becoming irateim not schizophrenic unlike you>you must've thought you were doing so welland that is how we call know you are autistic hahah
>>23929947>so youre going to lose again?lose what?I won our debate about idiot culls yesterday, and today you and I are only having a conversationyou can't lose a conversation, retardthe topic is life imitating art or vice versaand I don't recall you actually making an argument>im not schizophrenic unlike youI don't think you know what that means>and that is how we *all know you are autisticI think it was more the prolix responses which gave it away
>>23929960all of that just to say that you cant answer a question
>>23929965I've given you one, it just wasn't what you anticipated, so you're thus far unable to recognise it as an answer to the questionlet's try this:>Q: tell me what you program?>A: computersanswerednow answer mine:can you admit the logical error you made, or would it be too painful?
>>23929992>he still cant answer the question BAHAHAHAHAH
>>23929738>if you wanted to wound me, you would have to out-think me, earn my respectNigger we already proved last time you don't think, so that isn't hard mr armchair psychologist. You are incapable of self reflection or introspection. You're hardly sentient as far as I'm concerned. It's not like you actually engage with anything in debates but non sequiturs you set yourself so you don't actually have to argue. That's just a strategy of someone with nothing to say and no opinion other than the constant need for self validation by making logical fallacies until you "win". You are nothing.>>23929761>I really feel bad for you, and I don't like the fact that you carry hurt around with youOv vey didn't we go over your armchair psychology last time? You REALLY don't reflect or learn. Maybe you should have an ego anon, I think your whole "I've evolved past an ego" bit is causing massive brain degradation.>>23929772>in this case it is, you're absolutely right Nigger could've just said that to begin with last time baka>>23929786You got them honey.
>>23930016answered>>23930017look, it's a bevy of insults, but little in the way of substance>you're this, you're thatokayfirstly, I couldn't care less what you "think" about meunsubstantiated insults mean very littleif it makes you feel better about yourself, then carry on—perhaps it functions for you as a kind of a stress reliefmore to the point: are you clear yet on the distinction between psychology and philosophy, and between Jungian and Freudian analysis?you claiming there was no distinction between the former two was one of the more bizarre things I've read recentlyand do you understand that the tension between essentialism and existentialism is really more within the remit of philosophy, than psychology?I think where you're confused is that you thought some of what I originally wrote was meant to be uniquely applicable to the OP with the fetish>how can he say that?! he doesn't know OP!but it wasn'tit's just generally applicable to the nature of the self, especially in a contemporary Western contextit's clear to me you didn't actually understand what I wroteyou mistakenly thought it was me applying Jungian theory—I think it's only arrogance which tells you you understood it, because you were way off
>>23930089>he still cant answer the question
>>23930092answered
>>23930096>he still cant answer the question
>>23930017I should say, when it comes to the insults: I really think less is more, and you're overdoing it
>>23930098answered
>>23930100he still cant answer the question
>>23930103>answered
>>23930107still cant answer the questionalso take a look at our 'conversation' right now, do you think idiots or intelligent people would act like this?
>>23930113when you attempt to communicate with a chimp, you don't do so in Mandarin
>>23930116you also dont make chimp noises at it you retard lmao>when a child throws a tantrum the best thing to do is to throw one backyou would 100% be culled if there was one for idiotsstill hasnt answered the question
>>23930127>you also dont make chimp noises at it you retard lmaonot a Goodall fan, then, I take it?that's quite literally what you doyou're so confidently wrong
