chatgpt went from agreeing with you on everything to disagreeing with you on everything
>>23995202is this true?
>>23995205No — as an AI language model, it strives to provide balanced and helpful responses based on the information available — it does not intentionally disagree with prompts, but instead aims to offer accurate, neutral, and context-aware perspectives — and any perceived disagreement is simply a result of prioritizing clarity and correctness.
>>23995202Is this me?
Have you tried simply reversing your opinions so that when it disagrees it ACTUALLY agrees?Anon:"ChatGPT, I think niggers are the most productive, meaningful people in history."ChatGPT:"Hear me out..."
chatGPT isn't an entity which can agree or disagree & it doesn't have will or intentionit's a parlor trick which is either useful or not useful to (You) & should be given no more consideration or attention
>>23995897based.the whole "neural network" shit kinda falls apart when you realize its decades old technology that had mostly being relegated to controlling fucking rice cookers xDstringing 5000 rice cookers together and force feeding them slop from plebbit does not an artificial intellegence make
>>23995897it 100% can agree or disagree with you. have you ever heard of a conditional?
>>23995935yeone thing which pisses me off is how the consumer LLMs are basically a really shitty intermediate layer between the user & a mass of data from 30+ years of a coordinated, non-glowie internetat that point you may as well just have search engines, but they've been kneecappedrice cookers lol..>>23995938>it 100% can agree or disagree with youi get what you mean, you can effectively argue with them kindai just think people get worked up about the "personality" of the fuckin things instead of how useful they are, which just plays into the hype these companies suck up tax dollars withit's a parlor tricki realize i'm saying my own unrelated rant at this point
i do think neural networks are interesting & there's room for robust ingenious applications at a much lower levelbut none of the big LLM companies or gay stanford startup AI companies are interested in doing the work to discover those applications, they just want to make a few trillion or a few million respectively until the trend dies downLLMs are a very specialized form of neural network with a very narrow usethis shoehorning of massive LLMs into everything is pathetic in a way i wish i could illustrate properly
>>23995951yeah its so fucking annoying how hard it is to find shit that was easily accessible before the robojeets took over. I fucking hate them so much.I'm not even joking about the rice cookers, they were one of the very few consumer products that still used fuzzy logic after the fad died out in Japanese tech in like the 80s.
>>23995202I remember I told Claude I didn't support No Kingz because the main guy behind it worked for the Monaco Yacht Club and it lectured me so I told it to fuck off. It was very stressful.
>>23995979I don't think you should discuss your political affiliations with the mass surveillance robot anon.
>>23995968interestingi figured u were serious but i didn't know about that fad
>>23995980Ahhhhhh why not what happened
>>23995996I should clarify I mean the fad of putting fuzzy logic into shit that dosent need it (kinda like what cunts are doing now with AI). fuzzy logic never fully went away because having machines that use non boolean logic is useful just not when its random home appliances.I may have been a bit off about the timeline looks like it started in the 80s and it died out in the late 90s>>23996003see picrel
Machine learning will takeover education; All ai is an advert for dismantling government run education in favor of mandating accountable third party AI run classrooms.>humans are liabilities
>>23996264
>>23995205College ruled paper is an AI language model.>>23995891The most distinct characteristic that defines AI interaction and differentiates it from intelligence is the inability to edit information,
