/bant book thread
idfk>>24183777i gotta read that eventually
>>24183786oops, meant to upload Milne's CFT>>24183783In progress>>24183777Haven't started yet>>24183774In progress
In progress
>>24183774I read one crypto book from Springer, it was amazing.
quick bump to fix the long kot
>>24183789Any applied crypto books? I see you’ve mainly posted theory.
I only read serious books for mature men.
>>24183945I'm a pure math guy, what do you expect?
>>24183768so, it uses an eye catching picture to trick me into learning about computers. not impressed.
>>24186044What about in the field of security, networking?
are we posting textbooks because we're afraid of sharing books that we have emotional attachment to
perhaps /bant/ is the meeting point of the two ends of that bell curve meme
>>24187077maybe without glowies it could bethat's the idea
>>24187080Why would glowies post on /bant/? I don't get it./pol/, ok sure. /b/, definitely. but /bant/? What did we do to deserve glowie attention?/pol/ threads that end up here go inactive instantlyIt doesn't seem unreasonable that the provocative threads that get posted directly on /bant/ are just useful idiots.
>>24187088>>24187088>Why would glowies post on /bant/? I don't get it.>/pol/, ok sure. /b/, definitely. but /bant/? What did we do to deserve glowie attention?it's not like 1970 where there'd be literally like 100 guys sitting at folding tables making postsa lot of it is automated, doesn't take very much resourcesthe SITE deserves glowie attention4chan is an important strategic location on the internet, or is probably seen that way atleastno reason not to saturate every boardalso if you go to one board & it's filled with astroturf spam, but you go to another board and it looks completely different, that'd disrupt the astroturfing a lot & cause friction, you know?>It doesn't seem unreasonable that the provocative threads that get posted directly on /bant/ are just useful idiots.yeah u right, but the line between malicious & useful idiot gets quite blurry latelya lot of niggers may as well be paid glowies, except they're paid in fleeting dopamine & aren't aware of their importance
kiwifarms freaks obviously aren't glowies, but they help to keep the internet a non-constructive shithole, for examplei guess you'd call those useful idiots, but i wouldn't be surprised if they're encouraged by glowniggers, whether american or otherwise
>>24187088he calls everything a glowie thats outside of his understanding and doesnt seem to know the difference between what a glowie really is, a psyop, or a shill and lumps them all into onewhich is funny because he thought musk was some russian agent instead of a figure head for the CIA glow operations
>>24187107they're all one for the purposes of an imageboard user
>>24187107>which is funny because he thought musk was some russian agent instead of a figure head for the CIA glow operationsand i don't get what this has to do with the first line of ur post
>>24187088he has extreme mental illness and just calls anything that upsets him glowies, there's no sense in thinking any harder about it than this
musk bought twitter to sell it to russian glowniggers, that's all i'm confident about
>>24187113i am happy to hear you call it an imageboard now and not liken it to a chat roomits an improvment and you have been doing better latelybut you're still new and just making up your own definitions instead of learning the difference>>24187114you call everything a glowie except for the biggest and easiest one to identify and constantly getting things wrong >>24187119>trust me brogotta show proof if you're going to say things like this
>>24187129ok
