There's no logical reason not to press the red button unless you want to die.If there are people in the world who would press the red button, and we know for a fact there are, it would be strictly suicidal to press the blue button.
>>24260514>blue: we used to live in a society>red: selfish chuds
i see you've analyzed this deeply
>>24260514Green button.
>If there are people in the world who would press the blue button, and we know for a fact there are, it would be strictly murder to press the red button.Problem?
>>24260515>blue: we used to live in a society so I'm going to ignore the fact that blue button is suicidePretty pathetic.
>>24260514This is starting to persuade me but i guess it's culture dependent
Those buttons don't actually exist. Quit worrying about pointless shit.
>>24260518If you press the green button you live and collect $100
>>24260514The weak and the left fear the red button. It keeps them awake at night, it angers them, makes them sweat and tremble.
Is this one of those campaigns to ruin the board? I can't imagine anyone actually cares enough about this retarded bullshit to keep making threads. Everyone making these threads and replying to them is a tranny, a lefty or a glownigger.
https://poal.me/mu7mc7The dragon in question is corrin fire emblem
>>24260514>blue: if you get 50+% of your population to defend your nation you can stop an invasion>red: just live with your invaders (under their rule)
>>24260527I am not part of a nation with non-whites.
>>24260514Logical modelIf nobody chooses blue then nobody diesMorality modelIf you press red you refuse to play the gameExpected value (probability)You can expect to die if you play this gamePhysics model (potential)A potential function exists where when it reaches 50% an event occurs. Pressing the red button does not add any potentialChud modelPressing the red button then switching the colors of the buttons on your way out rigs the game and ends up with bILLIONS MUST die
>>24260514This isn't interesting enough to keep doing threads on. The premise is presented in a way to make it look like having empathy is a weakness, instead of stating simply pressing the blue button is Russian roulette. I think it may even be worth tapping the sign on.
>>24260528but you are part of voting population with themblue is literally what MAGA wants.
>>24260514another ai slide thread
>>24260517Oh shit I was wrong! This changes everything!
>>24260514it's simple: i press red because red is my favorite color
>>24260531Pressing the blue button would save the people who want to save everyone and those are specifically the people I want dead.
>>24260535you need 50+% to remigrate them
>>242605362 options:1) press the blue button, no good outcomes are possible.2) press the red button, hopefully liberals die off.
>>24260517I don't really need $100 so I'm not going to push it because others need the money more.
I think if it ever happened and blue won with less than 70% of the vote or something people would form death squads and try to purge red voters and perceived red voters in case the buttons come back.In that case it's still in your best interest to vote red, fuck those guys, but I don't know maybe if you already assume blue is going to win it might make some sense to rather have it be a landslide, if it turns out to be 50.3% blue we're getting a decade of Mad Max bullshit
>>24260539translation: i want to kill bluepressers
>>24260539If the vote happened and blue won by a very narrow margin, say hundreds of people globally. Things would be interesting.
>>24260515Red is the high trust cooperative option
>>24260527>You need to take the cardiotoxin or my cardiotoxin won't protect me somehow
>>24260514Trump's coke0 button
>>24260514Insider who worked for the Button Committee here.The elites don't want you to know this, but they all pressed red already and spend billions trying to convince you to push blue.They will print trillions more to buy up the property of the dead blue-button pushers and import billions of foreigners into first world countries and are spending billions to push red button pushing in 3rd world countries toward that end.You were warned.
>>24260542Cant be higher trust than blue. You are literally risking your life by trusting humanity will press blue too. By comparison red is the low-trust option. Bluechads win yet again.
The button dilemma is one of the most perfect instances of the bell curve meme I've ever seen.>The retardRed. Completely solipsistic. Just wants to live. Red button means life, blue button means death.>The midwitBlue. Oversocialized and conformist, cannot think of or imagine anything outside of his immediate social sphere. Doesn't want anyone he knows to die, and just wants everyone to think he's a moral person. Blue button is safe, because everyone in the world is just like him. Red button is genocide, blue button is savior.>The thinkerRed. Actually has some comprehension of statistics and human psychology. Is perfectly aware that his vote is practically insignificant in the grand scheme of things, and that the vast majority of the world's population is not a high-trust society, and that most self-professed bluefags will back out when their life is actually on the line, meaning team blue will always lose. Knows he can't save everyone, and accepts this reality. Red is button means life, blue button means death.
>>24260539That's not how it works.The gestapo show up to your door and offer you two choices. If you choose red nothing happens and they go away. If you choose blue they arrest you and drive you to a camp because you may be executed depending on the vote outcome.Now which button do you press
>>24260514>Blue Button Is For Idiotsshalom rabbi
>>24260548The hunt the commissars through the streets button.
>>24260514>If there are people in the world who would press the red button, and we know for a fact there are, it would be strictly suicidal to press the blue button.this doesn't follow. we know some will press red, some will press blue. blue doesn't require %100 for everyone to live, but you're asserting that the mere chance of some pressing red automatically means that more than 50% will press red. that isn't true.>goal is to save myself and only myselfpress red>goal is to save as much life as possiblepress blueI don't fault anyone who is at least honest and says they only care about themselves, but anyone claiming that red saves the most life is retarded.
>>24260551at any point a red will push blue once it has been narrowed down enough (family, neighborhood, town, city, nation). it takes a real weird person to push it when it's expanded more and more.
An yuropian wants to be morally superior so he chooses blue. Unfortunately for him, half of the population are niggers and pajeets and they don't care about raciss ass cracka, they want that smoke and pussy so they want to live. Yuropian dies, nigger lives. Truly a wonderful representation this test gives us on how fucked up current world is. We shouldn't want 100% to vote red, only 50,1%. Blue voters should honestly just die, they're a cancer this world is going through now
>>24260514I would press blue. Either the world is by majority good or I don't want to live in it.
>>24260515Who destroyed that society? Protip: it wasnt whites
>>24260527The red button without question kills the invaders
>>24260536Or I could help destroy the dollar and watch those niggers eat one another when the gibs dry up.
>>24260546We dont have a high trust society anymore. Even when we did, no one will willingly take a chance with their own lives for no reason. Blues live in delusion.
How is this retarded 3rd world framed question even getting any traction online? The question is just the prisoner's dilemma thought experiment, but backwards.
>>24260551>but anyone claiming that red saves the most life is retarded.It does. Most of the world's population will press red. If I also press red, it saves one life, my own.
>>24260558do you want to live in a high-trust society?
>>24260559Its not a prisoners dilemma. The point of PD is making a cooperation game in which mutual betrayal is the worst outcome, but there is literally no penalty for betrayal/self interest in this case
>>24260560>Most of the world's population will press red.that's how a red would think.>my own lifeyea, we know. that's not the most life. you've conceded that some (many) dying is worth it to save yours. you don't even care about the other reds.
>>534115862>but there is literally no penaltythe penalty is mass death.reds give away how lonely they are. no one in their lives who they care for.
>>24260561Has nothing to do with want. We dont.
>>24260559>>24260562>>24260566>>534115862That's what I was getting at with "but backwards" it has no penalty so taking the selfish outcome -UNLESS- you have friends, family, or loved ones that might press blue. So much like the PD it's challenging your faith in others but unlike PD it's telling people if you have any friends or family. That in short, you picking red is saying you are alone in your world.
>>24260566Here is the same game and why you are a retardOne red button is labelled CANCEL and by pressing it you opt out of the game.The blue button is labelled PLAY and by selecting it you volunteer to kill yourself if not enough players.Now which do you select
>>24260568would you be glad if it changed to a high trust society? can you entertain a hypothetical?
side note: I'm grateful the janny/mod just moved us rather than deleted this.
>>24260526do we all fuck that dragon or do i get my own dragon? what about women, do they have to fuck corrin too?
>>24260572again, you are only thinking of yourself. you had to change the game to fit that narrative.why would I want to live in a low trust society like that? I know people who would vote blue and I care about them.Don't you care about anyone but yourself?>THEY SHOULD THINK HOW I THINKbut they probably won't, and that's another reason why I'd press blue.
>>24260560>It does. Most of the world's population will press red. If I also press red, it saves one life, my own.[Citation Needed]
>>24260639Self-preservation kicks in and most will press the red button. Humans are animals.
>>24260882See that's the thing though, see >>24260571. You would only push red if the risk of your family and loved ones is zero, ie you are alone so Self-preservation kicks in. However if you have a wife, children, grand children, good friends, etc, that also get to pick between buttons, this is what will make you pause selecting red, because you might just kill the people you love for no other reason than to stay alive without them. The whole question is just testing to see how isolated a person is.
>>24260571>>24261005ffs, how are we still discussing this? If you have a kid who doesn't even understand what the buttons do, it's a coin toss whether or not your kid will live. You pressing blue and being the deciding vote that tips the scale in blue's favor is so unlikely, it's not even worth entertaining. A parent has even more reason to press red than a childless adult does, since it's a coin toss whether or not your kid lives, but if you press blue, you are very likely going to make your kid an orphan if he lives. You simply have no power to save your kid in this scenario, just yourself. Parents, and people in general who have a lot of people that care about them, have even less of a reason to become cannon fodder for the blue button than a socially isolated chud does.People really need to stop thinking that they as an individual have any significant sway in the blue button's favor. You are not the main character, you are not the hero, you are one in 8 billion, just like everyone else, and most people put their own safety first in a life or death situation.
