If you check the home page, /r/ (Adult Requests) no longer exists. It's highly likely that is due to the Take It Down Act coming into effect on the 19th. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_It_Down_ActIt's also noteworthy that Wired released an article on the 21st about how anons on /r/ were creating AI porn deepfakes of women without their knowledge or consent.https://www.wired.com/story/4chans-misogynist-wizards-are-nudifying-women-by-request/https://archive.ph/gmf4N
Fuck wamen, make mire AI porn of them. They don't deserve happiness
The US government has started arresting people due to AI porn, which likely spooked the admins enough to make the remove /r/.
>>24370668https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/two-individuals-arrested-publishing-ai-deepfake-pornography-violation-take-it-down-act
>>24370668/r/ is gone>replace bant with r in urlHOLY SHIT! THEY ACTUALLY DID!But those request weren't really fulfilled and anyone with a computer and internet access can just get AI to do that themselves.I bet the jeets are behind this
You can see the final posts on /r/ before it went down here https://archived.moe/r/
>>24370696It was a dead board anyways. bant is faster than r
>>24370650>Effective May 19, 2025Sounds like it’s already in affect and has been for nearly a year, regardless you can still find AI undressing threads on /b/ so clearly the law has not been that effective. Probably the next step will be to fund a federal cyber police agency to hunt down illegal AI’ers and arrest them.
>>24370650Weren't they mad when people were "De-Nudifying" women prior?
>>24370650yet you can still legally mutilate baby penises heredo they ever do anything that benefits men?
>>24370650link to the text of law:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11314https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/146/text/ih
>>24370727See this:> President Donald Trump signed the Take It Down Act into law last year, which makes it illegal to publish online nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, real or artificially generated. But the act gave online platforms one year to create a process for removing such imagery within 48 hours of notification from users. If online platforms fail to do so, they could face civil penalties of $53,088 per violation. That one year deadline expired on Tuesday. https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/19/tech/remove-revenge-porn-legal-deadlinethere was a deadline of a year after it passed
If you go to >>>/wsr/, the dedicated sticky still redirects users to >>>/r/ for NSFW requests kek. I guess the mods will have to post a new sticky on /wsr/.Anyway, I can see why such a law has been introduced. I don't think I'd like someone making AI porn of me. In saying that though, a lot of women make it very easy to not only make AI porn of them, but AI anything. They upload a gorillion pics of themselves onto Facebook and Instagram, a gorillion vids of themselves onto Tik Tok. They're giving these chuds a goldmine of training data to generate whatever they want.
