A few weeks ago, an anon posted that if Chainlink succeeds and everything goes as planned in the future, you could earn $1 per 1 LINK per DAY through staking. Does that mean if I’ve staked 2000 LINK, I’d earn $2000 per day?Is that true, or was the anon just talking bullshit?(captcha not required)
>>60869962Depends on stack size and apy
>>60869962Its a scam he pays wikiepdia you stupid NIGGGER >>60869975
>>60869985>he pays wikiepdialol ok weird point fuddie
Yes anon, and all Chainlink has to do is x350 in price. Such paltry gains are near guaranteed for such a titan coin of the crypto industry. Now hurry up and buy my bags, I need to exit this shitcoin as soon as I can.
>>60869993I am not fudding anything you stupid fat fuck Maybe if you go outside once in a while you would know what common sense is Why is it acceptable to pay wikipedia for removal of failed projects ? Faggot transgender wound
>>60870029> to pay wikipedia for removal of failed projects sauce?
Paying for data seems like a terrible business plan…data only gets cheaper not more expensive
>>60869962That would require link to be 10k per token, thats a 10 trillion mc or about 5x btc current mcThats not happening anytime soon anon0.02 usd per link per day would be possible if we get some traction going market wideSo know that would mean 2k usd per day for og stacks
>>60870376He pays Wikipedia for failed projects to be removed he will not disclose
>>60870401fuck off Wikipedia faggot
>>60870266>their imagination
>>60869962Yes, $365.25 p/a seems a reasonable return on a $23.07 investment at this time
>>60869962I remember when anons were making charts about BUILD rewards estimating a conservative case of $1.50 per link staked per project.
>>60871548and that wasn't far off
I think the person that told you this was trying to sell you something.......