I'm taking out a loan to buy an extra 1k link before sibos. Am I retarded?
>thinkin link will moon>everpathetique
They could announce 1.0 launch with official SWIFT partnership and it would pump 2% before retracing.
>>60873057no but im so traumatized from bagholding i cant comment rationally so keep your mental health in mind just as much as your money when it comes to link token
>>60873060>>60873066true>>60873074ill keep this in mind. I've been a link baggie but I've never been a baggie in debt so we'll see how this turns out
>>60873112source?
>>60873057i put my hair transplant on a credit car and bought chainlink instead best decision ever , but also worst decision for my credit score
>>60873131my hair looks good
>>60873143So... no source.This poster behaves like a bot anyway. A badly scripted one desu
>>60873057Same but an actual profitable coin, pepe
>>60873074Fuddie or marine?
loan secured bros i guess i should space out my buys in case of a dip >>60873201good luck
>>60873248gl anon. im also taking a debt risk by just leaving everything on my credit card and not selling staking rewards until smartcon
>>60873260I have $14k in creditcard debt spread out between 6 cards with 0% APR introductory rate, with the first 2 cards running out the promo in December and the rest of them in February.>t.1,300 Link
sergey's got an alien heart
>>60873260thanks. I think you'll make it.>>60873323it'll all be worth it soon anon
>>60873057Buying Vaulta's A >>>>Untold rule of the game
>>60873560>Buy ripplekek
>>60873646SHUT UP YOU ANNOYING LITTLE TWERP
>>60873646Written like an actual pajeet shitskin
>>60873057no, this is when you start to perceive everything as a casino, always trying again and again because "I've come this far, why not continue?"I'm no different either, I took a loan to have a small bag of Love and a couple of dogs, I like to gamble now
>>60873057Sunk cost fallacy is a mf lmao
>>60873066can’t happenpart of link’s security is economicyou can’t secure 2-3T (base 2026 case for tokenization with 30T case by 2030) with a coin below 200-300B security of the network requires thisand SWIFT isn’t stupida single announcement running this up could easily catch the eye of counterparties who would want to buy up the supply to ruin their well thought out agenda - it must run up immediately.even with securitizing 2-3T, SWIFTs announcement would be a clear indicator that this will eventually secure 30-100T.there can’t be an easy entry once this is “confirmed”. they’d be risking everything, and 11,000 banks won’t risk that.then again, linkies could very well just remain a POC and none of this is valid…. But if SWIFT is serious, yeah, they can’t leave this at the (((minimum))) below a 200-300B cap, and even then, there’s risk of large enough actors at that point to compromise the plan they have for the next 100 years.
>>60874240What LINK needs to pump is more left curve bagholders like yourself, so if you would kindly spread the word to whatever subreddits you frequent that would be great thx
>>60874240>you can’t secure 2-3T (base 2026 case for tokenization with 30T case by 2030) with a coin below 200-300Bthis is what ChainLink Labs have been working on, over years they have perfected the Ultimate Bagholder - the "Link Marine"entire platoons of link marines will stake their entire livelihoods to ensure security of the networkthe token might as well be a stablecoin pegged at $20, but you can be 100% sure they will never sell
>>60874320you’re not wrongSWIFT could come out and say they’re forking LINK or not using it at allI’m just taking the bet they will follow through on what they’ve been publicly planningIf I’m wrong, boohoo lost 500k I’ll make it back in 3-5 years
>>60873057Yes
>>60873057this year and next yearSergey has hinted that these next two years are going to be great
>>60874472two more years, stinkie xDit's always two more years
>>60873057link has always dumped post sibos, you are going to die
>>60873057yes, and I'm making 50 link.e a day staking on a dex
>>60873057i don't think you should take a loan for any speculative assetbut the link setup does look perfect though... bull run.. sibos and swift executives bull posting...and it all lines up perfectly with this post from last yearhttps://www.swift.com/news-events/news/live-trials-digital-asset-transactions-swift-start-2025it's ridiculous and looks so perfectbut me and everyone is so fucked by ptsd that we expect it to peak at $30
>>60873057
>>60873271Yep, you sure are.
>>60873271You sure are
>>60873271>>60875169>>60875174kek
>>60874472That's crazy as he hinted that in 2021 as well just before we all should have sold
>>60874569I don’t even expect it to pump
I took a $50k loan start of the year to buy 2500 LINK and while it was ultimately mistimed i don't regret it. In fact i'm thinking about doing the same thing again.
>>60875346Nice at least you didn't lose anything. And yea with the uncertainty in the market right now I bought $10k worth last night and I'll just keep buying some every day for the next few weeks until sibos. I'd rather have to buy slightly more expensive link than miss another good dip which could happen if btc and eth have another leg down.
>>60873057Why 1k? Just go all in, sell your property, take out a 100k loan and sell your family too. I now realise why link wont moon, its because they want to keep it at that price point to entice more institutions.
I recently went all in. Liquidated everything to buy LINK. Chainlink is the backbone of the world to come; if it isn't, there's no world to come to speak of anyway.
>>60875545>G0Y
>>60875545Pretty based, how many linkies that gives you?
>>60873057>literally putting an extra 1k into Microsoft 365 Excel LMAO
>>60873057No comment on link but taking out loans to make speculative bets is based.
it can't be that bad of an idea
>>60875658>>60875673>>60875714See these are bots ignoring the new report from www.mirc.com Your fat russian CEO pays wikipedia to remove his failed projects
>>60873109It will turn out badly. It's one thing to invest in a house or a college degree/trade school cert and pay it off, it's another thing to invest in internet meme money.
>>60873136Based
>>60873057that's a great idea. chainlink will have none of the risk and $1k more while owing you nothing at all. it's a great idea, make it $10k though
>>60875570Thousands (four digits)
>>60873057Unironically take out a massive loan on your house and go all in LINK. Debtmaxx as much as possible and go all in LINK. We're all going to wagmi
>>60874474I didn't say two more yearsI said this year and next yearThis year at Sibos and next year at Sibos
>>60876685so 2 more years ?? this year and next year = 2 years
>>60876694Sibos is in 28 days
>>60874240hasn't it been revealed years ago that quadratic staking allows maximum security even with a small amount of collateral?
>>60878191A small amount of collateral would theoretically be good enough in most cases but good enough is not how Chainlink rolls. 1:1 collateral/underlying at minimum is what I expect.
