>BTC now has smart contracts and privacyhttps://github.com/AluVM/aluvm-spechttps://github.com/RGB-WG/contractum-langhttps://rgb.tech/https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q34QcP2GMMUIt's over. BTC won. You aren't getting an alt-season.
>>60896668wow how will we ever live without the black swans and bullshitery caused by those shitcoinss??!
>now has privacyI hope you are correct and I will look into it.I just want to mention I remember when Monero got delisted from exchangesfor having privacy. I remember people getting problems for using tornado cash for legal purposes.
>>60896668oy vey, this is antisemitic
>>60896719>>60896765Haha. Crazy how this thread has no traction in the sea of shitcoin spam.
>>60896668Explain like I'm retarded
>>60897363When a mommy and daddy really love each other. The daddy gives mommy a special seed. Mommy turns this seed into a bitcoin.
didnt lightning offer some privacy already?is this also considered spam?will that mathew krager guy get a heart attack?
kek. the amount of engineering time wasted trying to turn satoshi's spaghetti code into a usable platform. no one will use this OP, it's not practical and no bitcoin "solution" ever will be used by anyone at scale. they are hobbyist projects at best.
>>60896668I am trying to understand this protocol more but it how is part of Bitcoin when it doesnt use the network? Seems convoluted and a little bit like ICP but built on top of BTC??
>>60896668What are those obscure repos? Bitcoin is not getting any of that, the retarded community is all in on the idea of "never change", so much so that even changing the block size is an issue.
>>60896668THEY SPEAK ENGLISH IN GITHUB???
>>60897489I don't know I didn't go to Burger King.
>>60897353It doesn’t matter if it’s BTC or Pepe or whatever. No one cares about any of this shit anymore
>>60896668LE SHIGGY NAKAMOTO
This AluVM project is for AI training. This will just fuel those conspiracy theories about bitcoin having an AI underneath it.
>>60897478It's not built on top, it's built in.>>60897480>Bitcoin is not getting any of thatIt's already live. I'm using it now.
>>60897738Tell us more about it. This looks interesting but a bitcoin core node obviously will not execute this at this point. How does it work? Is it on top of bitcoin (as in core nodes will not do anything with the data but nodes that are monitoring these transactions will execute them?) more information is needed.
>>60897738>>60897791yeah if you're gonna shill, tell us more.
>>60897791>>60897794just watch the youtube link.
>>60897869>45 minutes to tell me you built a zk coprocessor requiring an external validator set to read proofs out of a bitcoin block
>>60897883Good summary, much appreciated.
>>60897883so its unrelated to bitcoin, got it.
