Why is no one talking about this?
>>60897179>udranlmao not sending their best and brightest to fud these days are they
was this written by an ai, or just a retard? he keeps repeating the same paragraphs and phrases over and over again
Yes, it’s AI (traductor bug sorry). Go on X to check the post. It’s not FUD, but we have no visibility on the source of the off-chain revenue that goes into the Reserve. More importantly, the on-chain revenue from the nodes is also being siphoned by Sergey into this Reserve.Why didn’t they just burn the tokens?
you think you're entitled to visibility of their internal financials because you bought a few tokens with your lunch money? kill yourself moron
And the on-chain revenue? Why oracle income being siphoned off for the foundation?Why they didn't burn token ?
Wow a heckin x screenshot thread from some fud faggot reposting something with his sockpuppet accountSubhuman brownoid fuddies cant be abducted, tortured, and killed soon enough desu
>>60897179Theyre pocketing the profits!!Wait, what else would they do?
>>60897334>>60897242Wikipedia! Scam!
>>60897348I think you invested too much in the project.
>>60897179>chainlink is a scam repostedI DO NOT GIVE A SINGLE SHIT ABOUT YOUR RETARDED TWITTER CIRCLE JERKS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>60897404>here's what I, a brown "person," think about your investmentsDidn't ask, poorfag.
dun dunndun dun dun dun djn dun
>>60897179>>60897185chainlink’s original pie chart (1b link minted back in ’17) was **35%** earmarked for node incentives, **35%** dumped into the ico, and **30%** retained by smartcontract/chainlink labs for “development.” fast‑forward—those node‑incentive tokens never left a multisig ultimately steered by cl labs. on‑chain sleuths have watched the same wallets dribble link to cexes whenever payroll + marketing burns get spicy. functionally, that means the lab can tap **65%** of the float whenever they feel “strategic,” because the node war‑chest still sits under their thumb. yes, that’s commingling in everything but name.why the subterfuge? because economics: node ops still bleed money. feeds pay out peanuts (single‑digit bips per tx) and off‑chain reporting slashed hardware costs but not to zero. after six years, only the giga‑nodes (ppllike chainlink‑automation, chainlayer, figment, etc.) keep lights on, and they do it with otc link stipends from the mother‑ship. the long tail either volunteers or runs at a loss waiting for “hyper‑scale” that, idk, keeps getting punted to next quarter with staking v0.2 narratives.meanwhile cl labs sprouted to \~700 heads bc they’re a quasi‑saas shop now—ccip, data streams, tx abstraction, the whole modular‑rollup buffet. growth curve looks vc‑style, but the revenue curve? shrug emoji. so tokens = op‑ex. when the treasury address cold‑swaps 5‑10m link to kraken every month, that’s salaries + cloud bills, not altruistic node farming.* the 35% “node reserve” was never truly ring‑fenced; it’s dev treasury part2.* node operators aren’t self‑sustaining and probably won’t be until fees eclipse chainlink’s own subsidies—no line‑of‑sight rn.* cl labs disclosures are minimal on purpose; admitting the above torpedoes the “decentralized oracle network” ethos.
>>60897348Fish cuck seething as always
Because it's nonsense, as usual.Next fud attempt, pls.
Legitimate criticism gets called "fud".Whats the point of a crypto protocol if the revenue is off chain?You guys truly are in a cult
>>60898157Sorry chud, this pasta has been deboonked multiple times. The simple fact is that you can't argue that Chainlink is not using that wallet to incentivize the network, while also claiming that node operators are only able to exist because of Chainlink subsidizing them. These 2 statements are mutually exclusive. Subsidizing nodes = incentivizing the network. Simple as. >functionally, that means the lab can tap **65%** of the float whenever they feel “strategic,”"They control 65% of le float!" was true in 2017, but not anymore. 68% of the supply is circulating. Are you that actual anon or are you that brainlet anon who saves copy pastas from fellow cripples who sound smart to you because they use big words and run on sentences?
>>60898931Name a crypto that makes more on chain revenue
>>60897179Because linkies can't contain their embarrassment and shame anymore just like coping /pol/tards when someone addresses Trumps fuck ups
>>60899008Ethereum
>>60897179I think everyone knows? i mean, there is nothing to talk about, people just have bags that they hope go up?
>>60897252>you think you're entitled to visibility of their internal financials because you bought a few tokens with your lunch money? kill yourself moronare you a c u c k h o l d in real life tooor just financially? >>60897348>sockpuppet accountno attractive person has ever used this term>>60897356>Theyre pocketing the profits!!>Wait, what else would they do?let me break it down for you kidinvestors have given them $7b to fund a businesssaid business is now generating hundreds of millions in revenue (allegedly) instead of paying investors back, they have decided to "reward" them with a 0.5% return of their capital, and are acting like it's a big dealbasically they're spitting on you, and you're too dumb to realize it
>>60899008>Name a crypto that makes more on chain revenueit's hilarious how uneducated link boyscouts are about the rest of the spaceit's like your brain got stuck in last cycle
the cult is scrambling hard to run damage control>duuuuuuuuuude we're still e e early>duuuuuuuuuude amazon!!!!yeah here's the thing... you just missed the bullrun
Cry harder Adem.
>>60897348>>60898166So it's been sage all along posting these threats to the fuddies for months. He slipped and mistakenly posted his same line with his username.Twitter fishy being sage on here makes all the sense in the world.
>>60897185kek
>>60900111How does tether make money?Aside from market manipulation lol
>>60900625>sage is a unique usernamego the fuck back
>>60901068Sure thing, buddy. This sage guy has been posting threats toward the fuddies for months now. Same exact language and all. Come to find out this guy is fishy after all?
>>60901095it is i, sagemanyou may find me in all fields
>>60901122CheckedHello, sageman/fishy. Have a good weekend.
>>60901131pro tipget one of your co-workers or your supervisor to explain what saging means on 4chanor maybe just stick to reddit idk
>>60897179>>60897242>>60897334>>60897404udran u were supposed to make separate thread ! and u did not remove u r name from name field, go back to xrp tg to check your instructions before postings! you will not be paid for today if you continue!
>>60901122kek
>>60901095>this sage guyGO BACK
>>60900672hey man if chainlink is so virtuous, drop your usdt price feed servicesyou can be like the liberal companies who wont' do business with "xyz" because its heckin "bad"
>>60901314you’re 35 and still talk like a teenage retard
>>60901314It was a genuine question as I don't know how it makes moneyAlso no idea wtf your comment is about
>>60900672they accept usd and give people usdtthey turn the usd into bonds and earn money from the yieldsdefillama shouldnt have them on the leaderboard because its offchain revenue, when they supposedly claim all revenue should be onchainalso interesting how chainlink isnt on there when anons like this >>60899008 claim they have on chain revenue when i haven't seen any evidence of this
new build rewards incoming
>>60897179Scam coin buy ripple
>>60900625>>60901095>This sage guy
>>60897179You guys are so greedy!Of course Chainlink makes money from the network. That input is how the network grows.If you want constant earnings from holding the token, consider staking your LINK and getting Chainlink rewards.
>>60905414damn they really needed to make an infographic on how "token needed"
>>60906111checkedyes some people have been saying "token not needed" for years
>>60906946Who are these people you speak of and why would they say such a thing?
>>60906988Are they in the room with us now Timmy? More like your stupid fuck . You lack common sense .....hurr durr its ok if the CEO removes failed projects from wikipedia by paying them royalties Same way Putin gets rid of his enemies . All suicide a coincidence . Please refrain from questions Russian pattern? Stupid fucks Your CEO pays wikiepdia to remove his failed projects and you spread scamsWould you invest in company whose leaders job is to silence any review or critique of his passt failures ???Hmm.. sounds allot likePutin and his enemies that disappear or jump off a bridge ?Yes we should ignore the failed projects and bad things about CEO not ask any questions just follow the herdHurr durr stupid comminusim faggot suck my for thinking its acceptable to remove pages from history books i.e......Wikipedia for example niggerWikipedia is the source of truth . Not perfectPaying to hide scams ??? Burn motheruckerFuck you commieWe seek truthYour CEO pays wikiepdiaThe jig is upDo you listen to yourself ????????Stupid fucks your saying its fine to disregard a CEOs previous scams and just go with the flow trust is greater than truth????
>>60907070fake and gay
>>60897179Russian CEO pays WIKIPEDA for removal of his fraud
