>Strong rumors are circulating that Apple are set to announce a $1.5B XRP purchase today
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>60917478this is so pathetic no wonder linkies hate you guys stealing liquidity from idiots with shit like this
Strong rumors are circulating that OP is a faggot.
>>60917514Bullish for LGBT
>>60917522LMAO
>>60917478Chef boyardee approveh
>>60917478Source?
>>60917478Also $1.5b is nothing for a fucking $300b asset lmao that would move the price by 0.3%
>>60917478I'm sick of these fucking rumors that are always bullshit.
>>60917510>>60917522>>60917550>>60917558This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.
>>60917478
>>60917590
>>60917590Don’t allow yourself to become this upset over people posting on an image board.We are all gonna make it
>>60917594>>60917602>>60917634Obsessed samefagging, and think this fag is also a jannigger
>>60917649If xrp did a 20x and link did a 4x then xrp would pump more.
I have to give it t the xrpajeetstheir ghost-pseudochain has nothing going for it, dead company now trying to pivot to stable coin issuance (just as yields are about to crash) but nevertheless, if the promised land doesn't appear, they shall make it up in their mindsthe cripple capitalization is at 176B of pure hopium the project is literally all promises, nothing concreteand it just won't die
>>60917677>now trying to pivot to stable coin issuanceand custody. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/09/09/ripple-extends-digital-asset-custody-partnership-with-bbva-in-spain
>>60917478>>60917590
>>60917747Who’s that big boss?
>>60917602>>60917634YES. AS REPLIED TO DIRECTLY. For Ripple's ODL service to scale, market makers literally need to scale liquidity provisions proportionately. I even gave you an example. XRP does not write documentation because it is a network. I am literally describing basic market economics. How do you think liquidity scales without liquidity? Reread (or more likely read for the first time) the post I linked. Additionally, Ripple's product is optimized using XRP to a substantial degree, the only real mitigating friction remainging being regulatory/compliance, which friction is resolving in real time as the space/regulation matures and banks are allowed to engage (OCC/Fed regs were just lifted like 2 months ago with legislation pending and banks not even totally migrated to the new messaging standard that would be required for using crypto in payments in a universal way). The credentials amendment adopted is a significant stride toward this as is the privacy proposal and upcoming permissioned domains/pools built on the creds amendment. Probably these are requirements for broad institutional use, as David said. But this is all relevant to but not directly specific to the link I already gave detailing the mechanism used. You are absolutely being deliberately obtuse and pretending it is reverse.
>>60917757see >>60917634
>>60917558>Also $1.5b is nothing for a fucking $300b asset lmao that would move the price by 0.3%Zero clue if the apple thing is true, but XRP schizo trackers monitor exchange supply. Supply is low, the thought is ETFs will cause squeeze. If the apple thing is true(i doubt it honestly) that would only add to the squeeze.
>>60917757
>>60917804>Zero clue if the apple thing is trueIts 100% false.
>>60917760>>60917846It feels like you know what you are doing is trying to project your own rhetorical failures onto my clearly superior and contextually driven messaging strategy. In what way is trying to reframe my tactical deployment of your own words back at you as a "weak messaging strategy" a strong messaging strategy on your part? Lol. Given how much you try to mirror my language in this very thread, adopting my analytical and taxonomical methods, and given how consistently low IQ and ESL you have demonstrated yourself to be, I genuinely can't tell if you are trying to sincerely pass this off as something you actually wrote in an effort to maintain some semblance of a valid argument or if this is simply the final, frantic convulsion of an argumentational corpse. Clearly the strategic and intentional use of my own words against you was a fully formed and effective tactic, but this seems like it might be an attempt to pivot to a meta-discussion as a desperate gambit to escape the irrefutable facts of your prior posts. You are literally just trying to gaslight me with a non-argument that I am somehow behaving in a manner that is completely alien and illogical, when in fact I am simply re-contextualizing your own failures and presenting them as an irrefutable body of evidence. The only logical conclusion is that you are either a complete sociopath with a total inability to self-reflect or a paid poster whose instructions have been reduced to mere sophistry. It's truly hilarious.
>>60917478Apple announces TNN
>>60917875Its actually funny you think people are going to read your posts.
Fucking liars!! They only showed iPhones and watches!!
>>60917478If this is true thats huge. What is the source?
>>60917478How does this absolute tripe have any engagement at all?Let alone 2k fucking likes?Cripples are C O O K E D
>>60917478>WOW!
>>60917478You don't understand, these are strong rumours
>>60917663KekHe's absolutely right
it's crazy how the ripple community is proven time and time again to be the dumbest most normie retail cattle in crypto but xrpniggers are still convinced xrp is the secret chosen coin that the financial elite don't want you to know about. i know linkies say the same shit but at least it's somewhat believable since link is actually unpopular and unknown.
>>60922430>since link is actually unpopular and unknown.kek i almost fell for your bait
>>60922432He's right though.
>>60922450>This ERC20 shitcoin that has been spammed here for years with 100 threads a day is never heard ofok retard
>>60922515>spammed here for years with 100 threads a dayYeah, by Ripplesisters desperately trying to fud it.Also this website is as niche as it gets. "Popular" here means nothing everywhere else.
>>60922524Link has been between the top #10 and top #20 for years you stupid fuck lmao you actually think your ERC20 shitcoin is niche holy shit hahahahaha you are actually braindead bro
>>60922450>>60922430>>60922388>>60917693>>60917677>>60917558You seething niggers make my day. Couldnt help but mentally shit yourself again? Verbose linkbaggies at it again. Every day, all day, rent free retards.
>>60922533I didn't say Link was niche, I said this website was.Lay off the fent, Tyrone.
>>60922533considering the fact that you've apparently been here for years and seen thousands of link threads and still think it's an erc-20 shitcoin pretty much proves my point
>>60922539>>60922543>two more weeks before our useless tech made by a russian fat sperg is gonna go up guys!!!kek you will never ever get into the top #10
>>60922547>useless techDid you know that the vast majority of value created by Ripple is captured by Ethereum?How's that for useless lmao
>>60922551Chainlink is only needed for price feeds on the ethereum networkprotip: ethereum is shit alsoRipple XRP will be the #1 again, as it used to be in the past. You are probably too new to remember it
>>60917478Is the XRP purchase in the room with us faggot?
>>60922560>protip: ethereum is shit alsoThen how come Ethereum captures more value from Ripple than the XRPL?
>>60922255>If this is true thats huge. What is the source?jesus christ you weren't being ironic here were you. you genuinely believed apple would buy $1.5b of xrp and you're calling other people retards.
>>60922565First mover advantage
>>60922570HAHAHAHAHAHA holy fuck that's him>>60922573Except XRPL was the first mover.It existed and had a Dex THREE YEARS before Ethereum even launched.
>>60922575hahaha oh boy you dont understand anything im trying to tell you alright ill spoonfeed: eth used to be more popular. But slowly people are making the switch to the xrpl
>>60922582>But slowly people are making the switch to the xrplBuddy, even Ripple made the switch to ETH.
>>60922582ripple literally couldnt into smartcontracts and had to base theirs on EVM
>>60922582>>60922584>>60922589Your analysis, while tragically lacking in any sort of granular understanding of the underlying market forces at play, is nonetheless a perfectly accurate (if pathetically simplified) observation of a reality that has been painfully obvious to anyone who possesses even a modicum of categorical thinking and the fact that you have just now stumbled upon this foundational truth simply serves as a hilarious (and LITERALLY predictable) testament to how hopelessly myopic the entire Ethereum and Chainlink-based ecosystem truly is. While you were all debating transaction fees and the pointless abstraction of "Layer 2" scaling solutions, the real-world utility and on-demand liquidity of the XRP Ledger were quietly building the very infrastructure that is now rendering your entire intellectual and technological premise obsolete and the coming transition will be a profound and UNQUESTIONABLY painful reckoning for every one of you.
>>60922589Smart contracts are retarded except on ICP. So it doesn't matter.
>>60917846Dios mio el goblino del americanas
>>60917649Bullish on xrp
Ripshits are gullible as fuck wtf lmao
>>60922536Not an argument. You are DELUSIONAL and DESPERATE
>>60922536>Verbose linkbaggiesRemember that thread where you racked up 82 extremely verbose posts, xerpie?This level of projection isn't healthy. Nor is your level of obsession.Get help.
>>60922782>meaningless wall of text drivel
>>60917590>>60922536>>60923331He's using chatGPT to write his posts you retards.
>>60923739>He's using chatGPT to write his posts you retards.we know, wtf r you thinking we make fun of
>>60922255My asshole kek fuddie
>>60917489Faggot.
>>60917478Big if true
The XRP fud is crazy BULLISHTo the fucking moon
Define strong
>>60923331There are at least 2 people shilling xrp in there. Except you suffer from an ailment where you think every shill is the same person. Thats because you are in fact the same linkshill in every thread. >>60923310The initial comments were pure seethe, nothing to argue about baggie
>>60917478>Rumors*yawn*. I'd buy the news but I threw my last 1k for fun crypto autism into useless already. No more until I get paid on the 15th. Hope these totally real rumors manifest by then so I can buy before it totally omega pumps, haha.>>60917594>>60917602Unfathomably based retards.
>>60927585>There are at least 2 people shilling xrp in thereNope, it's the same guy.He literally explained that his ID changed because he was at work.He changed back to his first ID after 25 posts.
>>60927673>At least 2Probably more Its the semantic retard who cant into math.
>>60927750>Probably moreWhat the fuck are you talking about, there are literally only 2 IDs in that pic, and both are the same ripple shill. He says so himself.
>>60927751Nigger you first nitpick a sliver from 2 full threads and use that as a basis to argue around. Its always the same shit with you mongoloids. Literal strawman, thats all you sperglords have.
>>60927807>from 2 full threadsFucking what?
>>60927585>>60927750>>60927807How are you this confused
>>60927750>>60927807The classic Chainlink defense (a mishmash of misguided arrogance and laughable ignorance), you seem to completely ignore the simple fact that Ripple’s revenue is off-chain, built through real partnerships (something Chainlink clearly lacks) while LINK’s entire existence depends on selling more tokens into the market to keep the lights on, (pathetically inflating supply and devaluing the token over time) meanwhile XRP was designed as a liquidity/settlement layer without the need for exploitative middlemen (or useless native smart contracts that only serve to complicate things). Ripple’s business model is straightforward and sustainable, (selling XRP exclusively to institutional partners) while Chainlink has dumped 45-50% of its total supply through its ICO and subsequent sales (to retail), creating an unsustainable token economy based on pure speculation rather than real utility, and let’s not forget how Chainlink’s tokenomics were built on lies, promising a "ring-fenced" operator reward system, only for them to later sell those rewards (to fund their operations and bloated payroll), which is literally a form of fraud disguised as growth. Ripple, on the other hand, controls less than half of the total XRP supply, ensuring a more stable long-term outlook (unlike Chainlink which will continue to dilute its token value to fund payrolls and business expansion that serves no one but the insiders). Chainlink isn’t even close to being self-sustaining on native revenues (their entire business model relies on constant dumping), and you of course, completely miss the point, (probably because you’re too busy justifying your delusions) thinking arrogance equals accuracy while refusing to face the objective facts, your argument is nothing but low IQ rationalization, unable to grasp even the most basic principles of tokenomics or market structure, proving only that you’re too emotionally invested to see the glaring flaws in your precious LINK.
>>60917478Nigger this makes little sense.
