Bitcoin Devs Push Forward with Controversial Change to Remove OP_RETURN Limit. Will this be a good thing or a bad thing for BTC /biz/?
>>60918960Its the smart thing to do
>>60919026Doesn't it open up the block chain to attacks? Like CP being posted on chain.
>>60918960it's meaninglessbut a part of the schizophrenics are having a mental breakdown over it
>>60919425bitcoin is the worst fucking DA layer in the planet, this will never be a serious issue
>>60919637Can you explain to me why having a bad DA layer will prevent the CP attack?
>>60918960I think its good for an exclusive group to change a thing that is supposedly unchangeable. Next month, gold devs are adding an 3 extra atoms to gold. This is good.
whenever i read bitcoin protocol discussions theres way too much jargon and i cant understand it at allbut it sounds like its a nothingburger, people are saying the limit could already be bypassed by incentiving mining poolssounds like the only material change will be higher pixel nft collections that people will buy for a week and then get bored again
>>60918960wicked shit
>>60919425By that logic we should ban cars because they have the potential to crash or that we should ban guns because a certain percent of the population commit most mass shootings.You're retarded if you think that's a real issue. Public bitcoin nodes are able to verify the IP addresses of each transaction.>but shoulda woulda couldaNo.
>>60918960its nothing. Data will always exist on bitcoin. Has since forever anyways.
>>60922439>>60922760>>60924660i heard BSV allowed 100 KB of arbitrary data. Did something happen to BSV back then or was it a nothing burger?
>>60925187Bump
Bump
